Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
 Offline
Posts: 36319
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Wednesday, March 5, 2008, 13:40:11 » |
|
King's first tenure was not that bad.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Colin Todd
Offline
Posts: 3318
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Wednesday, March 5, 2008, 14:05:03 » |
|
I think you should add Kings tenure(s) to your signature points analysis Si.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Wednesday, March 5, 2008, 14:31:00 » |
|
I think you should add Kings tenure(s) to your signature points analysis Si. I'd like to see more of a matrix across the dimensions of points gained/decade played in/division where points gained. In a 3-dimensional pivot table. In your sig. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Colin Todd
Offline
Posts: 3318
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Wednesday, March 5, 2008, 14:49:46 » |
|
I think you should add Kings tenure(s) to your signature points analysis Si. I'd like to see more of a matrix across the dimensions of points gained/decade played in/division where points gained. In a 3-dimensional pivot table. In your sig. I'm working on it alright. :x |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Colin Todd
Offline
Posts: 3318
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Wednesday, March 5, 2008, 14:56:50 » |
|
I think you should add Kings tenure(s) to your signature points analysis Si. King (1) - 1.27 King (2) - 1.35 Todd - 1 Iffy - 1.12 Wise - 1.88 Evans - 1.38 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Wednesday, March 5, 2008, 15:18:10 » |
|
have u got Sturrock and Malpas' figures too?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
land_of_bo
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Wednesday, March 5, 2008, 15:31:49 » |
|
And Jimmy Quinn
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16357
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Wednesday, March 5, 2008, 15:36:33 » |
|
grr piss off sussex  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
Colin Todd
Offline
Posts: 3318
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Wednesday, March 5, 2008, 15:39:00 » |
|
have u got Sturrock and Malpas' figures too? Malpas = 1.36 Sturrock = 1.47 Byrne = 1.11 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Wednesday, March 5, 2008, 15:40:45 » |
|
grr piss off sussex Too slow. [/nerd]  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Wednesday, March 5, 2008, 15:41:37 » |
|
Interestingly, if you only include the games we won under him, then King averages 3.00
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC4LIFE
Fence Fucker
Offline
Posts: 2785
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Wednesday, March 5, 2008, 15:57:25 » |
|
Interestingly, if you only include the games we won under him, then King averages 3.00 :shock: |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
land_of_bo
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Wednesday, March 5, 2008, 16:02:06 » |
|
Hmm
Macari 1.68
Hoddle 1.54
Ardiles 1.44
Evans 1.38
McMahon 1.34
Quinn 0.91
Gorman 0.90
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Wednesday, March 5, 2008, 16:25:26 » |
|
I knew Jimmy Quinns would be low. He was abysmal.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 11832
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Wednesday, March 5, 2008, 18:14:22 » |
|
I knew Jimmy Quinns would be low. He was abysmal. He mopped up the shit given to him though, so bad were things he had to play himself. McMahon had 1 maybe 1 1/2 good seasons with us but then dismantled the team and replaced them utter shit like Elkins. Sturrocks average is quite low given it was pretty much mostly a promotion season from the bottom league. Early days, but Malpas' record hardly suggests the witch hunt some want to begin. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
