Luci
 Offline
Posts: 10862
Fatbury's Stalker
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 12:06:17 » |
|
I'd go as far as to say Reading are not rivals either. I honestly could not give a flying fuck about Reading, Cheltenham or Forest Green Rovers, who are all closer than Oxford. I have no interest or care for Reading either. Plastics. City & Oxford are the true rivals. I think some Brooker baiting could be fun tonight  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spencer_White
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 12:24:30 » |
|
Hereford is far far far more of a rivalry than Cheltenham, and they are twice the distance.
Tails, if they hate us so much why will they only bring about 400 tonight?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Matchworn Shirts
For Sale
Offline
Posts: 7091
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 12:25:18 » |
|
if they hate us so much why will they only bring about 400 tonight? ala Gillingham |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I come from a land down-under
|
|
|
Luci
Offline
Posts: 10862
Fatbury's Stalker
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 12:26:27 » |
|
Gills sprung to mind as well!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spencer_White
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 12:29:20 » |
|
if they hate us so much why will they only bring about 400 tonight? ala Gillingham exactly. Jills seem to have convieniently decided to forget about us now they have realised we are twice the club they are. As for Cheltenham, they havnt got any rivals for a reason. Like I said, Hereford have good support. They get plucky results, they wind you up. They are old school fans, like Rovers. Cheltenhams league history is pretty much all in this decade. And us such they are a bunch of poofs. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27137
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 12:33:52 » |
|
Hehe. Poofs.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
red macca
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 12:36:35 » |
|
if they hate us so much why will they only bring about 400 tonight? ala Gillingham exactly. Jills seem to have convieniently decided to forget about us now they have realised we are twice the club they are. As for Cheltenham, they havnt got any rivals for a reason. Like I said, Hereford have good support. They get plucky results, they wind you up. They are old school fans, like Rovers. Cheltenhams league history is pretty much all in this decade. And us such they are a bunch of poofs.[/quote]What like proper poofs? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tails
Offline
Posts: 10011
Git facked
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 12:43:57 » |
|
Hereford is far far far more of a rivalry than Cheltenham, and they are twice the distance.
Tails, if they hate us so much why will they only bring about 400 tonight? Because they have crap support. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 12:56:33 » |
|
I don't really give a fuck about Cheltenham although I recall being pretty wound up when they dicked us 3 or 4-0 at their place then Gurney gobbing off at our end.
Plenty more fun derby days to be had then Chelters.. the usual suspects like Rovers, City, Oxford etc but you've got Gills, personally I fucking loathe Bournemouth and Brighton, and as SW said, Herefords normally a good crack.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 13:05:43 » |
|
It's more of a derby than MK Franchise will EVER be...despite Central calling it a derby every time we play that scummy team.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spencer_White
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 13:10:36 » |
|
I don't really give a fuck about Cheltenham although I recall being pretty wound up when they dicked us 3 or 4-0 at their place then Gurney gobbing off at our end.
Plenty more fun derby days to be had then Chelters.. the usual suspects like Rovers, City, Oxford etc but you've got Gills, personally I fucking loathe Bournemouth and Brighton, and as SW said, Herefords normally a good crack. Only others I would add would be Reading and Luton. It was only 2-0 at their place. But they beat us 3-0 at home.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21289
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 13:11:00 » |
|
of course its a derby.but one with no real bite to it.
lack of history on cheltenhams part is the reason as we all know.
they like to see us as a big rival though.i see them as small and insignificant.
fair play the way they rose up the leagues mind.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Luci
Offline
Posts: 10862
Fatbury's Stalker
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 13:11:51 » |
|
Franchise I hate with a passion, should be burnt and wiped from all existence and memory of English Football.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SwindonTartanArmy
Go Team GB!
Offline
Posts: 2917
London Scottish - More History than Franchise!
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 13:16:32 » |
|
Franchise I hate with a passion, should be burnt and wiped from all existence and memory of English Football.  :thumbs: |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Vi er best i verden! Vi er best i verden! Vi har slått England 2-1 i fotball!! Det er aldeles utrolig! Vi har slått England! England, kjempers fødeland. Lord Nelson, Lord Beaverbrook, Sir Winston Churchill, Sir Anthony Eden, Clement Attlee, Henry Cooper, Lady Diana--vi har slått dem alle sammen. Vi har slått dem alle sammen. Maggie Thatcher can you hear me?
Your boys took a hell of a beating!"
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
We don't need no stinking badges.
Offline
Posts: 59592
Things can only get better
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 13:22:50 » |
|
Gotta agree with Arriba and Lady there, spot on.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Only a fool does not know when to hold his tongue.
|
|
|
|
