|
McLovin
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 14:12:00 » |
|
20 goals last season, mostly from the bench tells a story.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
 Offline
Posts: 32444
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 14:28:33 » |
|
20 goals last season, mostly from the bench tells a story. Only 8 in the Premiership though. Swapping him for SWP is a shite deal for Chelsea, really shit.... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
red macca
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 14:32:44 » |
|
Shit for spurs aswell
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32444
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 14:41:32 » |
|
not at all.
Spurs have no wingers, SWP plays on the wing and is better than their current wingers
Spurs have better strikers then Defoe anyway
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
neville w
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 14:44:59 » |
|
not at all.
Spurs have no wingers, SWP plays on the wing and is better than their current wingers
Spurs have better strikers then Defoe anyway Isn't Aaron Lennon still there then ? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21289
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 14:46:47 » |
|
i agree it would benefit spurs.
i were defoe i'd be looking to go to either villa,pompey,newcastle ect
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
red macca
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 14:47:27 » |
|
not at all.
Spurs have no wingers, SWP plays on the wing and is better than their current wingers
Spurs have better strikers then Defoe anyway Dv behave, they have melbranque. lennon and they both play right side he also has used chimbonda in that position.Im sorry but if anything he needs defenders and a left winger. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32444
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 14:47:42 » |
|
not at all.
Spurs have no wingers, SWP plays on the wing and is better than their current wingers
Spurs have better strikers then Defoe anyway Isn't Aaron Lennon still there then ? Overrated beyond belief and injured. Plus you generally have a wing either side. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
red macca
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 14:48:40 » |
|
not at all.
Spurs have no wingers, SWP plays on the wing and is better than their current wingers
Spurs have better strikers then Defoe anyway Isn't Aaron Lennon still there then ? Overrated beyond belief and injured. Plus you generally have a wing either side.[/quote]They are both right wingers |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32444
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 14:48:52 » |
|
not at all.
Spurs have no wingers, SWP plays on the wing and is better than their current wingers
Spurs have better strikers then Defoe anyway Dv behave, they have melbranque. lennon and they both play right side he also has used chimbonda in that position.Im sorry but if anything he needs defenders and a left winger. Malbranque would be better used in the centre of the park, or just off the front two. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pumbaa
Ha, no cunt in my title anymore. Oh.....
Offline
Posts: 6351
Fartmeister
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 14:49:12 » |
|
Their priority is left midfield. They have enough defenders, its just they're all injured!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
red macca
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 14:49:52 » |
|
not at all.
Spurs have no wingers, SWP plays on the wing and is better than their current wingers
Spurs have better strikers then Defoe anyway Dv behave, they have melbranque. lennon and they both play right side he also has used chimbonda in that position.Im sorry but if anything he needs defenders and a left winger. Malbranque would be better used in the centre of the park, or just off the front two. thats not your decision though is it |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32444
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 14:51:14 » |
|
not at all.
Spurs have no wingers, SWP plays on the wing and is better than their current wingers
Spurs have better strikers then Defoe anyway Isn't Aaron Lennon still there then ? Overrated beyond belief and injured. Plus you generally have a wing either side.They are both right wingers Both are capable and have played on the left.... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
red macca
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 14:52:15 » |
|
not at all.
Spurs have no wingers, SWP plays on the wing and is better than their current wingers
Spurs have better strikers then Defoe anyway Isn't Aaron Lennon still there then ? Overrated beyond belief and injured. Plus you generally have a wing either side.They are both right wingers Both are capable and have played on the left.... You just said lennon was over rated  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
neville w
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 14:52:42 » |
|
not at all.
Spurs have no wingers, SWP plays on the wing and is better than their current wingers
Spurs have better strikers then Defoe anyway Isn't Aaron Lennon still there then ? Overrated beyond belief and injured. Plus you generally have a wing either side. Overrated in your opinion, not mine. I didn't know he was injured. If you generally have a wing on both sides - thanks for that clarification - why have two right wingers then ? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
