TalkTalk
|
|
« Reply #15 on: Thursday, August 16, 2007, 09:24:50 » |
|
In some instances, we invest through joint-ventures with other real estate development partners. Here we go then.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27137
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Thursday, August 16, 2007, 09:29:33 » |
|
Am I missing something? Why would an investment banker/fund manager want to run our club?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mister Lorenzo
Dirk Diggler
Offline
Posts: 238
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Thursday, August 16, 2007, 09:35:17 » |
|
Does this mean our current(old) owners have just raised more money from an investment firm - So there hasn't really been a takeover at all ?? Smoke and mirrors !!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Thursday, August 16, 2007, 09:36:19 » |
|
Does this mean our current(old) owners have just raised more money from an investment firm - So there hasn't really been a takeover at all ?? Smoke and mirrors !!! Dunno .. funny cos that was my old mans take on it .. god i hope not tho
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TalkTalk
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Thursday, August 16, 2007, 09:39:05 » |
|
Portuguese holding companies, Jim Little, Rufus Brevett. Confused? You will be. To answer Batch's question and putting the pieces together. It looks like the "takeover" is a consortium composed of an investment company with an interest in property development, presumably to run the business side, a Portuguese investment vehicle to feed trialists on the playing side - possibly the Castro brothers - and Diamandis and Wills stay onboard and keep their fingers in the pie. Oh I can't wait.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TalkTalk
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Thursday, August 16, 2007, 09:40:46 » |
|
And I wonder what St Modwen's take is on all this? Have they been bought out as well?
[Edit] Or perhaps they are a "real estate development partner"?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
The_Plagiarist
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Thursday, August 16, 2007, 09:42:50 » |
|
"Bullshit investment" springs to mind. Surprisingly this is all shady as fuck.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ardiles
Offline
Posts: 11528
Stirlingshire Reds
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:00:50 » |
|
The conduct of the key players involved in this transaction is disgusting. Complete disregard for the supporters of the club. Drip feeding information as & when it suits them. We deserve so much better than this.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC_Gazzza
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:03:12 » |
|
NEW OWNERS OUT! Cue: Fatters to take it seriously and go spasticated again!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Colin Todd
Offline
Posts: 3318
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:17:03 » |
|
WE'RE DOOMED, DOOMED I TELL THEE
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
axs
naaarrrrrppppp
Offline
Posts: 13469
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:19:16 » |
|
i'm going to give up now and go and support supermarine.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Foggy
Offline
Posts: 1948
Ketchup wanker
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:26:53 » |
|
I am just going to wait and see what happens before deciding that the new investors are the anti-christ in disguise. This section should be renamed the" Bored" section. The club are not at liberty to discuse their business on an internet forum for fucks sake.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sad to say, i must be on my way
|
|
|
The_Plagiarist
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:39:24 » |
|
You do that foggy. Keep us updated please.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
wokinghamred
Offline
Posts: 613
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Thursday, August 16, 2007, 10:44:02 » |
|
Interesting comment from the Cork City chairman when Jim Little got involved with Cork
"It has been a long few months of negotiations but I am happy now to be able to welcome Jim on board. I understand that people may have become frustrated with the lack of news but due to the process involved it was important to do everything correctly.”
Sound familiar?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|