|
|
Richard4acre
 Offline
Posts: 152
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 08:49:41 » |
|
4 for me, the others all seem a littl eodly shaped, bit too square perhaps,
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ne day, The County Ground will be a happy place.
|
|
|
|
magic8ball
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 08:49:52 » |
|
Certainly would be nice to go back to something a little more traditional.
1 and 3 are both good, but I will be voting for number 3.
And while we're going all old school and that, can we have a 25 year old Don Rogers back in the team aswell please?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dazzza
Offline
Posts: 8265
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 08:52:23 » |
|
Cracking idea but not overly thrilled by the design of the new badges.
Nice progression for the 1990 displayed badge but not sure about that gold trim!
1, 3 or 4.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27137
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 08:55:26 » |
|
I like 3 the most, but I still don't really like it. :|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 09:01:59 » |
|
same here - 3 for me .. but I want the Robin on top!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
juddie
Offline
Posts: 2978
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 09:03:52 » |
|
I'm glad they're changing the logo - there was uproar when they produced the shit one we have to put with now and thankfully it's going back to the old school. bout time if you ask me. Our current logo is absolutely dreadful.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 09:05:08 » |
|
They are all Cakk
Agree with the heritage making a comeback
Why not just re-use the old one ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
juddie
Offline
Posts: 2978
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 09:06:09 » |
|
that's also not a bad idea!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mattboyslim
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 09:11:51 » |
|
Hammer the club with emails asking for option 5 none of the above! I can see what they've tried - but they've failed. Look a bit GCSE to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
Offline
Posts: 12556
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 09:15:30 » |
|
I really like number 3. It's ace
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 09:16:33 » |
|
I actually quite like option 1
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 09:18:28 » |
|
Changing the foundation date makes a mockery of this seasons anniversary kit though...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Glostered
Offline
Posts: 69
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 09:18:52 » |
|
Option 3
Although I think they are all poo.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lambourn red
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 09:26:34 » |
|
Option 3 is by far the best, they all look naff on the website but I would imagine they would all look good on the shirt.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
