DerbyRed
 Offline
Posts: 455
|
 |
« on: Monday, October 9, 2006, 16:14:35 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Monday, October 9, 2006, 16:16:22 » |
|
Christ on a bike, are the club incapable of communicating with people without airing their dirty linen in public?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tails
Offline
Posts: 10011
Git facked
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Monday, October 9, 2006, 16:20:41 » |
|
Christ it's like a fucking dictatorship.
Will I get a statement for that?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Panda Paws
Offline
Posts: 2170
Arse
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Monday, October 9, 2006, 16:23:09 » |
|
This is getting like managing the club via Football Manager.
"The board has indicated it is delighted by the manner of your latest win ... "
Fucking hell. Is Sega running our club or what? Give it a rest!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Panda Paws
Offline
Posts: 2170
Arse
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Monday, October 9, 2006, 16:23:56 » |
|
Christ it's like a fucking dictatorship.
Will I get a statement for that? The club would like to state that Tails' comments that the club is a dictatorship is a direct attack on its backers. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 11802
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Monday, October 9, 2006, 16:28:09 » |
|
shakes head and leaves discussions around this subject.
and yes, the board did say the bit right at the end, don't think anyone ever though the board were trying to harm the club so it goes without saying. Not sure what this is being released for really as it seemed to me everything ended quite well at the end and the Trust et al have made it quite clear they don't currently have £3m sitting in a bank, they are merely trying to raise the funds.
Anyway, enough has been said.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 14546
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Monday, October 9, 2006, 16:30:37 » |
|
These 'statements' are just becoming totally meaningless. I think the Board should have a nice big cup of shut the fuck up.
Oh dear, I expect SSW will read this and pull out of the club :shock:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55572
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Monday, October 9, 2006, 16:32:12 » |
|
Batch would like to indicate that continual statements from the club regarding critisism of how the club is run shall from hereon be met with the rather childish but apt smiley
:fu:
Any attempt to double stamp my triple stamp will be deemed a personal attack on myself and my advisor, the one that lives in my head and tells me what to do.
I appeal to the club to do one decent thing and shut the fuck up.
Batch. 9/10/06
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spencer_White
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Monday, October 9, 2006, 16:33:46 » |
|
To be honest and personally speaking I think the criticism has been fairly restrained considering what has gone on. They deserved criticism and they have taken some. But they still dont see anything at all wrong with the way the club is being run at the moment.
I can understand the Wills not having anymore money to put into the club. Therefore, we do need to find some sort of buyer. I think a fans consortium could provide little investment but better running of the club. Whereas at the moment we have little investment and a very poor running of the club under Dunwoody.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Monday, October 9, 2006, 16:53:03 » |
|
I dont believe it !
:boohoo:
I really dont !
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Monday, October 9, 2006, 16:53:15 » |
|
fans reps :piemonte: Board rep.
Classic tactics, get them in for beer and sandwiches, see the colour of their money then shaft them.
I like.
If we want rid, then it will need something altogether more serious.
If we accept the status quo, Confernce here we come and don't complain.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
stfctownenda
Offline
Posts: 1818
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Monday, October 9, 2006, 16:56:10 » |
|
Absolute bunch of clowns, cant believe they came out with that statement after the trust, Rob T and the supporters club saying it was a positive meeting. What can they possibly gain from attacking the fans trust, supporters clubs and fans in general. As crazy as it sounds the only way this might get better is if they go...really think it may of come to this now :x
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PHIL!!!!
Our Resident Emo Kid
Offline
Posts: 1948
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Monday, October 9, 2006, 16:58:17 » |
|
What!? You people would moan if they didnt produce club statements!
Everyone moaned about the board/club not communicating with the fans, but when they do, you all moan! They cant win.
Is it harming anyone by releasing club statements? No.
:roll:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dazzza
Offline
Posts: 8265
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Monday, October 9, 2006, 17:01:53 » |
|
I can’t understand why the club have waited until now to release that statement if they were not happy with the comments on the 28th.
Seems ludicrous to have gone to the trouble of mobilising Cliff ‘Peace Pipe’ Puffet following the Trust organised fan’s meeting on the 28th, had a ‘clear the air’ meeting on Friday, released a joint statement to work together and then go and release that statement today.
I know the club are behind a bit on the accounts but are they a few weeks behind on GMT than the rest of us?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Monday, October 9, 2006, 17:07:01 » |
|
What!? You people would moan if they didnt produce club statements!
Everyone moaned about the board/club not communicating with the fans, but when they do, you all moan! They cant win.
Is it harming anyone by releasing club statements? No.
:roll: Absolutely.....yes....Wise said on Sat he's had enough oof this stuff, the fans groups try to take out the sting and now this.....it may of course be calculated to get DW to walk and so save money. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
