STFC Bart
Offline
Posts: 1114
|
 |
« on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 10:09:22 » |
|
1) Why are we still only offering 1 year contracts- i understood the arrival of Power meant we could compete for the "Better players out there". This isnt going to happen only offering players a year, they will get better deals elsewhere.
2) What is happening about signing a proven striker at this level- show us the colour of your money
3) Whats happening with the redevelopment?
4) When are you going to rplace that weasal Carson with someone for chairman who cares for the club
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
singingiiiffy
Offline
Posts: 2911
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 10:14:10 » |
|
zzzzzzz
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 10:17:21 » |
|
i wouldnt have put the question quite like that ... but certainly answers Id quite like too ..
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bushey Boy
Offline
Posts: 8351
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 10:20:34 » |
|
1) Why are we still only offering 1 year contracts- i understood the arrival of Power meant we could compete for the "Better players out there". This isnt going to happen only offering players a year, they will get better deals elsewhere.
2) What is happening about signing a proven striker at this level- show us the colour of your money
3) Whats happening with the redevelopment?
4) When are you going to rplace that weasal Carson with someone for chairman who cares for the club Surely its better to only offer one year deals to players in this division. What happens when we get promoted? we would be left carrying league 2 players. 2. Its in hand, we also have peacock and roberts. 3. I believe plans are being redrawn that will meet council regs 4. No proffessional will answer that question.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
singingiiiffy
Offline
Posts: 2911
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 10:22:22 » |
|
i dont know what you expect mark d to say to those shit questions.
"we are trying our best to get rid of wealsel carson, it is my main objective"
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bennett
No Comment
Offline
Posts: 9745
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 10:28:43 » |
|
bart do you work in politics at all?
|
|
|
Logged
|
This is the water. And this is the well. Drink full and descend. The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 12323
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 10:32:39 » |
|
1) Why are we still only offering 1 year contracts- i understood the arrival of Power meant we could compete for the "Better players out there". This isnt going to happen only offering players a year, they will get better deals elsewhere.
2) What is happening about signing a proven striker at this level- show us the colour of your money
3) Whats happening with the redevelopment?
4) When are you going to rplace that weasal Carson with someone for chairman who cares for the club Surely its beeter to only offer one year deals to players in this division. What happens when we get promoted? we would be left carrying league 2 players. 2. Its in hand, we also have peacock and roberts. 3. I believe plans are being redrawn that will meet council regs 4. No proffessional will answer that question. Looks like the right answers to me. On the contracts, we offered 3 years to O'Hanlon and in Jan we offered longer than 12 month deals. Maybe it's a decision based on each player individually, or is that just a daft idea? As far as I can see we have only been told we lost out on one player and the recent departure was being offered 3 years, so the deals being offered are not causing a problem.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 10:39:55 » |
|
the mistake was not offering that 3 year to Rhys instead of O Hanlon .. he would have taken 2 years im sure
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 15113
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 10:41:10 » |
|
4) When are you going to rplace that weasal Carson with someone for chairman who cares for the club
Mark Devlin is hardly going to answer a question like that is he? So why ask it? Cock :?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 10:55:29 » |
|
4) When are you going to rplace that weasal Carson with someone for chairman who cares for the club
Mark Devlin is hardly going to answer a question like that is he? So why ask it? Cock :? he wont answer it but,does carson really care for the club? that is more important i think. can you honestly say you haven't had a similar thought about carson? so who's the cock?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 15113
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 11:02:31 » |
|
No, I don't like Carson but that's not the point. There's no point puttin questions to Mark D that he cannot be expected to answer! What do you mean, "Who's the cock" 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 11:03:56 » |
|
Your all cocks..
ROAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
/ W56196272
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 11:05:15 » |
|
the person for asking, or the person who has the same thoughts but slates someone else for stating so???
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 15113
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 11:06:06 » |
|
the person for asking, or the person who has the same thoughts but slates someone else for stating so??? You're missing the point. I can't be fucked to explain any more.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday, July 4, 2006, 11:08:58 » |
|
i fully understand your point.it is obvious devlin will not answer the question, but it is something we are all thinking in all honesty
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|