sonicyouth
 Offline
Posts: 22352
|
 |
« Reply #120 on: Friday, April 14, 2006, 01:55:01 » |
|
because he was going to get us relegated. we needed to make a change, it was made and this football club is in such a bad state that we're gonna get relegated anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ben Wah Balls
Offline
Posts: 5972
|
|
« Reply #121 on: Friday, April 14, 2006, 01:58:50 » |
|
I think he'd have kept us up but what's done is done. Had to ask though.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #122 on: Friday, April 14, 2006, 02:07:38 » |
|
naturally.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bennett
No Comment
 Online
Posts: 9745
|
|
« Reply #123 on: Friday, April 14, 2006, 09:07:42 » |
|
I think he'd have kept us up :roll: |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
This is the water.
And this is the well.
Drink full and descend.
The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #124 on: Friday, April 14, 2006, 10:05:33 » |
|
Why did we though. Fuck knows. Because we'd lost a huge numbers of games in a row and attendances had hit rock bottom, clown. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ben Wah Balls
Offline
Posts: 5972
|
|
« Reply #125 on: Friday, April 14, 2006, 12:59:01 » |
|
5 is not a huge number of games, he'd turned around worse runs than that before and our average attendance has dropped since King left, the lowest of the season, rock bottom if you like, was home to Tranmere 4,139.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
|
« Reply #126 on: Friday, April 14, 2006, 13:06:42 » |
|
5 is not a huge number of games, he'd turned around worse runs than that before and our average attendance has dropped since King left, the lowest of the season, rock bottom if you like, was home to Tranmere 4,139. midweek for a rearanged game.king had to go the fans had turned on him |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #127 on: Friday, April 14, 2006, 13:10:14 » |
|
tranmere was a hastily rearranged midweek game, hardly a fair and accurate representation. iirc, tranmere bought very few as well.
bradford at home had an attendance of 4,590 which was the third lowest and was coincidentally our 5th consecutive defeat and king's last game in charge.
second lowest was the following home game against port vale.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
|
« Reply #128 on: Friday, April 14, 2006, 13:14:46 » |
|
I think he would have turned it around as well but sadly to many short sighted idiots were on his back so for the sake of the football club it was probably right that he went when he did.
I still have alot of time for him and I miss his mentalist post match interviews.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
/
W56196272
|
|
|
Ben Wah Balls
Offline
Posts: 5972
|
|
« Reply #129 on: Friday, April 14, 2006, 13:17:22 » |
|
I think though the average attendance for King's 5 home games this year was 5,950, higher than last year.
Our average attendance has now dropped to 5,820 so it's certainly not fair to say attendances had reached rock bottom.
It is true that the board was forced to act with so many fans against him couldn't really keep him but still a shame.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #130 on: Friday, April 14, 2006, 13:40:30 » |
|
two out of those five were against forest and yeovil who bought 2,500 and 1,350 fans respectively. that bumps up the average a fair bit.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #131 on: Friday, April 14, 2006, 18:57:28 » |
|
and Swansea who bought 3,000
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
