PHIL!!!!
Our Resident Emo Kid
 Offline
Posts: 1953
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Sunday, April 9, 2006, 16:45:52 » |
|
We should definetly stick to 442. No doubt about it.
The team should be:
Evans, Jenkins, Nicho, O'Hanlon, Migs, Shakes, Brown, Platt, Diagouraga, Cureton, Peacock
Subs:
Bulman, Smith, Ifil, Whalley, Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sippo
Living in the 80s
Offline
Posts: 15616
I ain't gettin on no plane fool
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Sunday, April 9, 2006, 16:50:31 » |
|
If we do start with 442 we'll be ok. I don't want us to start negative otherwise it wil be another forest. We need to remain positive. We need to attack them, if we let them come to us they will destroy us. I seriously think we can get something from this game.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
|
|
|
|
magic8ball
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Sunday, April 9, 2006, 16:53:15 » |
|
We should definetly stick to 442. No doubt about it.
The team should be:
Evans, Jenkins, Nicho, O'Hanlon, Migs, Shakes, Brown, Platt, Diagouraga, Cureton, Peacock
Subs:
Bulman, Smith, Ifil, Whalley, Roberts I'd agree with this almost. Platt has to be at the back somewhere, he looked well out of his depth in midfield yesterday, maybe didn't have enough room to play. Jenkins needs to go. Smith is better at full-back than wing-back. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33905
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Sunday, April 9, 2006, 17:30:38 » |
|
Need to go 4-4-2....4-5-1 is a no no we cant afford to not win this game....we should start with the highest tempo possible and try to get an early goal
Evans
Jenkins
O'Hanlon
Platt
Nicholas
(although given a choice, id drop 3 of those 4 defenders...but we have no replacements)
Smith (Swansea have good wingers, he will offer slow old man Jenks more defensive cover)
Touami
Miglioranzi (why not eh?)
Brown
Cureton
Peacock
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Sunday, April 9, 2006, 17:33:40 » |
|
personally id put 3 up front. what is the point of playing a negative formation or 4-4-2 that really wont get us anywhere. we have to win and we wont without playing attacking football.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tails
Offline
Posts: 10197
Git facked
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Sunday, April 9, 2006, 19:07:36 » |
|
Last time we tried 4-3-3 we were shit.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Sunday, April 9, 2006, 19:19:24 » |
|
Our record under Iffy isn't too bad this season, and remember the first 3 or 4 games where we only picked up a point he was still adjusting Kings team.
10 losses
8 wins
12 draws
30 games – 36 points.
1.2 points per game.
A more experienced manager would be better for a fight next season, but Iffy deserves another crack. I would suggest that Iffy's future is in the balance....to his advantage is that he's relatively cheap, but we'll stop paying King in the summer which will free up something more like a proper wage. If the fans start having a go at the Board, then they'll throw Iffy to the dogs, just as they did with King....then it'll be another cheap option. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Whits
Morphined Up
Offline
Posts: 8136
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Sunday, April 9, 2006, 19:24:09 » |
|
i'm taking my boots on tuesday, just incase they need someone to replace big trev up front. fancy my chances of a hat trick or a heart attack  :? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Plays in midfield and his name is Tommy Miller,
signed him from Huddersfield his name is Tommy Miller,
first touch is average but his second is a killer,
heeeeeey Tommy Miller!
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Sunday, April 9, 2006, 19:25:56 » |
|
or both
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sippo
Living in the 80s
Offline
Posts: 15616
I ain't gettin on no plane fool
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Sunday, April 9, 2006, 19:27:10 » |
|
you can't do any worse whits!  If you have a heart attack you'll have still have more movement than the team  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Sunday, April 9, 2006, 19:29:07 » |
|
I'd like a 4-4-2 but I sincerely doubt Iffy will get it right.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Sunday, April 9, 2006, 22:09:07 » |
|
DV... stop suggesting Migs, please. He's been shit, and there is no reason to drop the black bloke or Whalley.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Sunday, April 9, 2006, 22:23:38 » |
|
DV... stop suggesting Migs, please. He's been shit, and there is no reason to drop the black bloke or Whalley. :thumbs: Toumani was ace on Saturday. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nomoreheroes
The Moral Majority
Offline
Posts: 15748
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Sunday, April 9, 2006, 23:34:12 » |
|
I suggest that we go with the tactic of scoring more goals than Swansea.
NMH
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
You're my incurable malady. I miss the pleasure of your company.
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33905
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Monday, April 10, 2006, 11:45:41 » |
|
DV... stop suggesting Migs, please. He's been shit, and there is no reason to drop the black bloke or Whalley. the bloke can play football, plus he goes short for the ball and takes it off the defence, sometimes....something we didnt do once on Saturday.... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
