Title: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: stfcinbmth on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 12:15:19 Has been announced. Special programmes on BBC and ITV about it now. Why? Do they really think the ordinary folk of the UK could give a fuck? Get ready for media overkill FFS
Sorry, this sort of shit really winds me up Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Summerof69 on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 12:16:15 Time to keep off all the news channels for the rest of the day then.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Simon Pieman on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 12:17:24 Didn't someone like Woolworths manufacture a load of memorabilia crap pre-empting this? Someone will make a fortune from it
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Abrahammer on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 12:18:15 What are the chances it will declared a public holiday if its during the week?
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 12:28:05 Has been announced. Special programmes on BBC and ITV about it now. Why? Do they really think the ordinary folk of the UK could give a fuck? Get ready for media overkill FFS Sorry, this sort of shit really winds me up I don't personally care, and don't really know anybody who does. But given the reaction when Diana got fucked, or when the queen mother fucking finally snuffed it, it's fair to say that there are a lot of people out there who do. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: woolster on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 12:29:51 Has been announced. Special programmes on BBC and ITV about it now. Why? Do they really think the ordinary folk of the UK could give a fuck? Get ready for media overkill FFS agree with this, bunch of parasites & spongers :zzz: :smugfu:Sorry, this sort of shit really winds me up Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Sippo on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 12:30:00 OMG?
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Batch on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 12:34:18 OMG - I think a mocking of overreaction ;)
As already said, the most important question is do we get an extra day off work? Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: chalkies_shorts on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 12:37:29 Oh great. No doubt she'll calf down and we'll have even more bloody Hun parasites running around.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: woolster on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 12:41:20 the coalition mention a return of married tax, he must be running low on cash to spend at all the up market events he gets in for free :no:
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Batch on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 12:42:27 the coalition mention a return of married tax, Marriage is taxing enough already Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: woolster on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 12:43:36 Marriage is taxing enough already :DTitle: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: STFC_Gazza on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 13:18:59 I notice they are not doing it in 2012, Don't want to be overshadowed by my wedding clearly!
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Batch on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 13:22:24 I notice they are not doing it in 2012, Don't want to be overshadowed by my wedding clearly! We'll ask the Queen to move her Diamond Jubilee for you too Gazza. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: STFC_Gazza on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 13:28:34 We'll ask the Queen to move her Diamond Jubilee for you too Gazza. Cheers mate! ;) Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 13:30:15 I wonder what cuts the government will try to bury under this convenient news.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: STFC_Gazza on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 13:34:34 I wonder what cuts the government will try to bury under this convenient news. I jokingly said something similar at work! Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 13:35:39 Ahhhh I think it's nice! Wish someone would marry me! :)
AND! She will get to be the queen lucky bitch Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Ardiles on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 13:36:26 Ahhhh I think it's nice! Wish someone would marry me! :) Isn't that Jamie's job? Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: STFC_Gazza on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 13:37:17 Ahhhh I think it's nice! Wish someone would marry me! :) AND! She will get to be the queen lucky bitch Not if (when) they get divorced! Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Ardiles on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 13:40:32 Has been announced. Special programmes on BBC and ITV about it now. Why? Do they really think the ordinary folk of the UK could give a fuck? Get ready for media overkill FFS Sorry, this sort of shit really winds me up Thing is...I think quite a lot of people actually do. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: STFC_Gazza on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 13:45:17 Thing is...I think quite a lot of people actually do. My mrs already asked if we can line the procession route, im thinking no cuz she will get ideas!!! Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 13:47:49 Gary that's a strange think to say if your getting married soon??
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: STFC_Gazza on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 13:50:55 Gary that's a strange think to say if your getting married soon?? Not really!!! Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 13:58:36 So if we all club together and buy them a massive fuck-off toaster, will they promise to pay for their own wedding/do after/honeymoon instead of leaching it off the taxpayers?
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Ardiles on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 14:01:20 If I was going to be picky (and I'm only doing this to wind you up!) I'm quite sure the wedding is going to generate more revenues for the Exchequer than it will cost.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: suttonred on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 14:02:07 I'm buying them some eggs.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 14:02:38 If I was going to be picky (and I'm only doing this to wind you up!) I'm quite sure the wedding is going to generate more revenues for the Exchequer than it will cost. Bah, humbug! :)Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Phil_S on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 14:08:52 I wonder what cuts the government will try to bury under this convenient news. The payouts to those muslim fanatics ? Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pumbaa on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 14:13:40 Mrs pumbaa looked after Price William when he was 5 years old. Although I doubt the cunt will remember and our invitation will be lost in the post.....fucking royal mail.....
Still, got to be grounds for a public holiday/day of national celebration/reason for muslim marches * (*delete as appropriate) Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: suttonred on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 14:15:15 Bah, humbug! :) I wouldn't worry about Ardiles opinion, he likes rugby ffs. Next he'll be saying he's not going to Rochdale as Striclty factor is on tv.. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: chalkies_shorts on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 14:28:38 I wouldn't worry about Ardiles opinion, he likes rugby ffs. Next he'll be saying he's not going to Rochdale as Striclty factor is on tv.. Hasn't he got a butler / valet as well. Fuck me, he's close to royalty - or is he a ginger pretend like Harry HewittTitle: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Ginginho on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 14:41:15 Ahhhh I think it's nice! Wish someone would marry me! :) AND! She will get to be the queen lucky bitch Is that how it works? Why is Prince Philip not King Philip? Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 14:43:51 Is that how it works? Why is Prince Philip not King Philip? Isn't it because Kings outrank Queens but the queen's more important so he can't be King. You don't have that problem with a male heir. Could be wrong. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Ginginho on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 14:45:49 That makes no sense :)
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 14:47:38 That makes no sense :) It doesn't does it.I think I mean that if he was King it would sound like he's more important than ElizabethII when he's not because she's the reigning monarch. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: THE FLASH on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 14:49:41 a day off - whoop!!
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Ardiles on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 15:02:26 Hasn't he got a butler / valet as well. Fuck me, he's close to royalty - or is he a ginger pretend like Harry Hewitt Where the #### did that come from?! ??? Anyway, to answer Sutton...I'm not going to Rochdale because a man's going to deliver a skip to my house on Saturday morning [insert joke here] so, unfortunately, I'll not have time to get there before kick off. And I have no idea what this Strictly X Factor business is all about, so pls leave me right out of that as well. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: THE FLASH on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 15:04:09 Where the #### did that come from?! ??? Anyway, to answer Sutton...I'm not going to Rochdale because a man's going to deliver a skip to my house on Saturday morning [insert joke here] so, unfortunately, I'll not have time to get there before kick off. And I have no idea what this Strictly X Factor business is all about, so pls leave me right out of that as well. I can feel a 'Worst excuses for missing a game' thread starting soon! Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: STFC_Gazza on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 15:18:20 It doesn't does it. I think I mean that if he was King it would sound like he's more important than ElizabethII when he's not because she's the reigning monarch. As Ben says, this is because of the male dominated system in the monarchy. At present, males in line to the throne (Charles/William/Harry) take precident over females (Beatrice/Eugenie), and male monarchs take precident over female monarchs. This means that a king is allowed to call his wife 'queen' although she is not queen in her own right, but any queen born in her own right cannot call her husband 'king'. As an example, if he dies she does not automatically become queen but the throne then passes on to their oldest male child which is why Queen Consort Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon was named The Queen Mother and not named Queen after George the VI died. SO when Queen Elizabeth II dies and assuming Phillip is still alive too, he does not automatically become King, It is passed down to Charles who is named King, This does not mean that Camilla will be named Queen however she could be if he decided. He has already said that Camilla will be Princess Consort when he becomes king. Same with William and Kate, If Kate is still married to William when he becomes king he may or may not name her his Queen however public opinion so far says that yes Kate should become Queen when William becomes King. Public opinion also sways alot of decisions becuase if Diana was still alive and married to Charles , the public would have wanted Diana named Queen. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Power to people on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 15:49:05 What is the betting that once wil is married to katie charlie will renounce the throne to his eldest son
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: ghanimah on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 15:54:07 Has been announced. Special programmes on BBC and ITV about it now. Why? Do they really think the ordinary folk of the UK could give a fuck? Get ready for media overkill FFS Sorry, this sort of shit really winds me up To put that into perspective: 1) Over the last couple of days, the Eurozone is in a crisis, which more than likely will result in bail-out of at least Ireland (partially funded by British taxpayers money at a time of cuts) and if not successful will impact on the British economy drastically including jobs. TEF response...er..nothing. Not a peep. 2) Conversely within a couple of hours of a Royal wedding being announced, a post appears on TEF asking the question does anyone care and is currently running at 3 pages. So the answer to your initial question stfcinbmth is, yes they fucking do. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 15:56:54 I care about neither. Can you really begrudge people getting a bit misty eyed about this though? We whinge that we're becoming too american, and then when a particularly british event happens we whinge for having a bit of fun about it all. In these times if despair can we not look for small mercys.
Miserable cunts Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: STFC_Gazza on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 16:01:18 What is the betting that once wil is married to katie charlie will renounce the throne to his eldest son I agree actually, charles will renounce his turn at the thrown giving it to William and Kate. No one wants Camilla there although there is an acceptance for her now but not as queen, so it makes Charles look good, everyone wants William as next king anyway so would make perfect sense, to some restore some sense of pride in the monarchy as well. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: nevillew on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 16:32:10 Would that make Charles the King Father then ?
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: donkey on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 16:37:47 A Royal Wedding. Yipee!
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: suttonred on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 16:59:03 Where the #### did that come from?! ??? Anyway, to answer Sutton...I'm not going to Rochdale because a man's going to deliver a skip to my house on Saturday morning [insert joke here] so, unfortunately, I'll not have time to get there before kick off. And I have no idea what this Strictly X Factor business is all about, so pls leave me right out of that as well. I reckon he's mixed you up with PWP. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: oxford_fan on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 17:01:12 What are the chances it will declared a public holiday if its during the week? This is the most important part of all. Will I get a day off work? Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Lumps on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 17:30:14 however public opinion so far says that yes Kate should become Queen when William becomes King. Public opinion also sways alot of decisions becuase if Diana was still alive and married to Charles , the public would have wanted Diana named Queen. I think there's a fair chunk of public opinion that thinks we could probably struggle along without any of the freeloading bastards, but that's another can of worms popped open I guess. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Sippo on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 18:07:31 I never realised she was so fit!
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Sippo on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 18:11:29 On the news they say she's middle class. Fuck off is she. She's a proper toff.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: tans on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 18:15:22 Be an extra days holiday wont it
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Langers on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 18:24:26 Be an extra days holiday wont it We can but hope! Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 18:31:55 As long as it's during pre-season and won't interupt the football calendar then I won't be bothered.
But if it does...... [url width=450 height=338]http://seattlest.com/attachments/seattle_audrey/hulk.jpg[/url] Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: leefer on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 19:11:03 I offer my congratulations to the happy couple :-[
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: adje on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 19:14:53 I offer my congratulations to the happy couple :-[ Im sure they'll be delighted Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Spencer_White on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 19:16:23 theyve got to get married before Wills goes completely bald.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: bathford on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 19:40:54 So tell me.
How many NHS / Local Authority / Armed Forces jobs / 'Blue Light' services redundancies / cuts will pay for this? Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: steptoe41 on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 20:13:44 So tell me. How many NHS / Local Authority / Armed Forces jobs / 'Blue Light' services redundancies / cuts will pay for this? I don't think it will be much of a "do", as even the fucking engagement ring is second-hand. Tight Cunt... Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: tans on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 20:35:38 I don't think it will be much of a "do", as even the fucking engagement ring is second-hand. Tight Cunt... :D Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Arriba on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 20:43:22 good luck to em,but not a penny from the public pot should go towards it.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 20:53:19 I'm sure the Royal Family will have a rainy day fund of some sort.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: leefer on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 20:56:01 I'm sure the Royal Family will have a rainy day fund of some sort. Have they been invited them.....that Tomlinson will cause carnage ;D Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: steptoe41 on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 20:56:56 My Arse!!!
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 20:58:04 The happy couple are said to be delighted.
[url width=300 height=180]http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/1265000/images/_1268342_aherne_cash300.jpg[/url] Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Mexicano Rojo on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 08:51:24 i didnt actually realise that people still talk like them, kate middletons accent is just fucking stupid.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 08:52:39 Ahhhh but shes so pretty and that ring is pretty immense!
I reckon she should go for some "Jordanesque" wedding to annoy everyone!! Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: STFC_Gazza on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 08:55:30 Kate Middleton has swifty kicked Cheryl Cole off the perch as the "nations sweetheart", She is fit though! Accent does my head in though!
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Mexicano Rojo on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 08:57:32 i may be in a minority here but i would quite happily murder them both.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: fittons_coaching_badge on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 08:59:23 i may be in a minority here but i would quite happily murder them both. I could easily be talked into helping you! ......... She is fit though :-) Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 09:21:42 good luck to em,but not a penny from the public pot should go towards it. Could we not at least get the Germans to chip in some, it's their Royal Family after allTitle: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: jonny72 on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 09:56:41 good luck to em,but not a penny from the public pot should go towards it. Don't see how you can avoid public money being spent on it, even if it's just for police and stuff like that. But you've got to offset that against the money it brings in. They reckon the monarchy brings in £500m of tourist spending a year, that figure will go through the roof with a royal wedding. They you've got the boost to our economy as loads of people will be buying mugs, flags and other gay shit. Besides, the Royal family only cost about £40m last year. That's fuck all compared to the benefits. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Arriba on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 10:09:06 what benefits? people would visit castles and palaces if the monarchy was abolished.people love history and that won't be effected.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: STFC_Gazza on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 10:12:00 Don't see how you can avoid public money being spent on it, even if it's just for police and stuff like that. But you've got to offset that against the money it brings in. They reckon the monarchy brings in £500m of tourist spending a year, that figure will go through the roof with a royal wedding. They you've got the boost to our economy as loads of people will be buying mugs, flags and other gay shit. Besides, the Royal family only cost about £40m last year. That's fuck all compared to the benefits. People (the yanks) will travel over next year to line the procession route of the wedding bringing money in, all the plates, tshirts, union jack flags, cups, saucers, prints etc that are sold will make shit loads for the economy as well! Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Ginginho on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 10:12:51 Ahhhh but shes so pretty and that ring is pretty immense! I'd love to see her ring, i'd give it a right royal bashing. I'm quite apathetic toward the Royal family. I don't have any ill feeling toward them, however I don't hold them in any regard either. I quite like the two lads though, they seem quite normal and grounded. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: jonny72 on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 10:20:06 what benefits? people would visit castles and palaces if the monarchy was abolished.people love history and that won't be effected. It's the monarchy that people come to see, not their homes - it's a pity we don't like and respect it as much as the rest of the world does. Never understand what the fuss is about with the anit-monarchists, the monarchy is slimmed right down and doesn't cost much - as a country we piss away more money on trivial things every single day. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: STFC_Gazza on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 10:34:56 It is a "feel good" story for a lot of the country in tought times. Too many Diana was a sign of hope really and "all thats good in the world", Kate clearly will be taking that role now, like it or not.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Phil_S on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 10:47:45 At least the monarchy does something for their money..... and we make a profit on it too. There are thousands who do fuck all in this country & we support them & make a loss. Extremist anti british muslim poppy burners for one example.
The best arguement for the monarchy though is the alternative of course. We'd end up with a president. Imagine a President Cameron, President Brown, or even worse vice president Prescott or Clegg. Of course I might be wrong & we would have to bow & scrape to President Rumpoy. Give me an alright Prince William & a good looking princess any day thanks Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Lumps on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 11:37:43 It's the monarchy that people come to see, not their homes - it's a pity we don't like and respect it as much as the rest of the world does. Yeah, because they're placed on display in the Royal Palaces like monkeys at the zoo aren't they. 99.999% of tourists must never clap eyes on a royal, but they still keep coming; and France still seemed quite busy with tourists last time I was there. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: jonny72 on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 11:53:02 The best arguement for the monarchy though is the alternative of course. We'd end up with a president. Imagine a President Cameron, President Brown, or even worse vice president Prescott or Clegg. Of course I might be wrong & we would have to bow & scrape to President Rumpoy. No one really thinks through the consequences of getting rid of the monarchy. If they did, they'd realise it would be yet another politician taking the presidency role and I reckon we're all sick enough of them already without giving them more power. Besides, it's the prime minister that runs the country already - the Queen has fuck all powers left and doesn't exercise those she does have. Yeah, because they're placed on display in the Royal Palaces like monkeys at the zoo aren't they. 99.999% of tourists must never clap eyes on a royal, but they still keep coming; and France still seemed quite busy with tourists last time I was there. Yeah, but I didn't say royals - I said monarchy. You might not see the royals themselves but you've got stuff like the guards outside Buckingham Palace, the flags showing whether she's in or not and so on. Foreigners (especially the Yanks) love all that shit. Sure we'd get tourists without the monarchy but we'd have lost one of the major attractions. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Ardiles on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 12:05:40 I think the main objection that republicans have is they don't like being 'subjects' of the monarch...which I can understand. For me, it's not very high up my list of things that keep me awake at night though. Some aspects of the monarchy are a bit odd...obsession with killing wild animals, funny accents etc. But on balance, I think they're OK. Anti-monarchist sentiment is nothing new - it's existed in various degrees right throughout history. If we were going to get rid of it, I think we'd have done it by now.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: inthebutt on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 12:29:42 I think seeing tax payers will be funding this wedding we should get to all be involved. I suggest pimps and ho's theme. WOuld love to see the queen in frilly corset. Can imagine Prince Phillip running around chasing young ho's and swearing,being rasist. The usual shenaeghans
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: bathford on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 12:48:54 Intersting point about the gifts, flags etc and the revenue from these.
Lets not forget most of this will be made in the Far East probably China. Non of the revenue from this production, ie staff wages will be paid out to uk staff. Re the royals attracting income. People come to see the history not the people. Tourists don't go to the Tower of London to see the Royals. They go for the history. They don't visit France to see the Royals they visit the beautiful Palaces for the buildings and the history. The tourist trade would manage without the Royals. Oh one more thing. The royals and their PR claim she's middle class. I'm not sure if I know too many middle class families that talk like her..... A very strange and distant perseption of middle class! Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: bathford on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 13:03:56 Oh yes just one more thought!
Isn't this more about protecting the family business. Daddy has completely thrown a spanner in the works by marrying the ugly one! She won't be accepted by the general public as queen so get his son to marry and by-pass Charlie and make wills king. Problem solved!! If you really need to see how ugly camilla is come on down to bath on Thursday, she's turning on the xmas lights!! Oh joy really useful! Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: jonny72 on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 13:06:15 If we were going to get rid of it, I think we'd have done it by now. We did in 1648. Eventually it turned to shit and we got them back in 1660. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: bathford on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 13:12:03 We obviously didn't give it long enough. If we only got rid of them for 12 minutes when people were at work then nobody would have had time to get use to it.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Bogus Dave on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 13:19:34 We obviously didn't give it long enough. If we only got rid of them for 12 minutes when people were at work then nobody would have had time to get use to it. Haaaaaa I don't understand why people moan about england losing it's heritage then want rid of the monarchy. If you want to live in america, move there. This is england, deal with it Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: tans on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 20:45:47 Wonder if this is the crockery for the wedding meal
[url width=450 height=449]http://images.replacements.com/images/images5/china/C/franklin_mint_franklin_mint_plates_no_box_P0000013539S0022T2.jpg[/url] Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: tans on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 20:51:17 Or this for party games?
http://thetownend.com/index.php/topic,33278.0.html Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Batch on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 20:56:40 Wonder if this is the crockery for the wedding meal I think Nev came up with the comments: www.eatingoffthepeoplesprincess.tumblr.com Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: herthab on Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 22:43:00 President, Monarchy, who gives a shit?
How will having one or the other even remotely affect your lives? Answer - It Won't. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Ardiles on Thursday, November 18, 2010, 08:48:22 i didnt actually realise that people still talk like them, kate middletons accent is just fucking stupid. Remembered your comment while reading the following passage in the paper last night. Very true! 'Kate may be excitedly claimed as a commoner, but she is also a solid Sloane. Having heard another ex-Marlborough College girl, Sam Cameron, talking like Fearne Cotton, I was intrigued to hear Kate's voice. Like William, she makes central use of the short “u” vowel, as in bun. She talks of loving Ufrica, and of William's cucking, and of wanting to wuk hard in the fumily business.' Evening Standard article (http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23898539-wills-and-kate-a-blokeish-heir-and-his-girl-with-cindy-crawford-hair.do) Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: nevillew on Thursday, November 18, 2010, 13:24:34 I think Nev came up with the comments: www.eatingoffthepeoplesprincess.tumblr.com That's pun-tastic ! Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: leefer on Thursday, November 18, 2010, 16:57:52 i didnt actually realise that people still talk like them, kate middletons accent is just fucking stupid. You not been to Bristol then lately Red..... Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Lumps on Thursday, November 18, 2010, 19:49:52 Remembered your comment while reading the following passage in the paper last night. Very true! 'Kate may be excitedly claimed as a commoner, but she is also a solid Sloane. Having heard another ex-Marlborough College girl, Sam Cameron, talking like Fearne Cotton, I was intrigued to hear Kate's voice. Like William, she makes central use of the short u vowel, as in bun. She talks of loving Ufrica, and of William's cucking, and of wanting to wuk hard in the fumily business.' Evening Standard article (http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23898539-wills-and-kate-a-blokeish-heir-and-his-girl-with-cindy-crawford-hair.do) Am I the only one that thinks that the supposedly "gorgeous" SamCam looks like the reflection of a moderately attractive woman in the back of a large spoon? Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Simon Pieman on Thursday, November 18, 2010, 19:56:50 No you're not.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, November 18, 2010, 20:46:29 i didnt actually realise that people still talk like them, kate middletons accent is just fucking stupid. Durham during term time is rife with such accents. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Thursday, November 18, 2010, 22:15:58 Am I the only one that thinks that the supposedly "gorgeous" SamCam looks like the reflection of a moderately attractive woman in the back of a large spoon? People think Mrs Cameron's gorgeous? Really? Like who? I'd have said "moderately attractive" was pushing it some. But you're right about the spoon thing, ha, ha, either that or one of those security peephole things in doorsTitle: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: lambourn red on Thursday, November 18, 2010, 22:54:15 I don't think it will be much of a "do", as even the fucking engagement ring is second-hand. Tight Cunt... The first person in Dianas ring since Dodi Fayed.. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: inthebutt on Friday, November 19, 2010, 11:34:05 PMSL :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Sippo on Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 12:03:24 Friday 29th April.
It should be a public holiday? Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Ginginho on Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 12:30:54 It has already been announced that the wedding day will be a public holiday
http://www.tntmagazine.com/tnt-today/archive/2010/11/19/david-cameron-promises-day-off-for-royal-wedding.aspx Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Sippo on Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 12:33:09 sweet, 4 day weekend!
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Arriba on Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 12:37:10 sweet, 4 day weekend! 3 day.easter monday the same week Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Sippo on Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 12:44:02 ??? May day bank holiday monday is on the 2nd, hence 4 day weekend.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Arriba on Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 12:46:18 my mistake.read it as 4 day week,not weekend...
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Batch on Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 14:25:59 It has already been announced that the wedding day will be a public holiday http://www.tntmagazine.com/tnt-today/archive/2010/11/19/david-cameron-promises-day-off-for-royal-wedding.aspx Sweeeeet. If the Queen pops it at the wedding reception we'll be down to a 2 day week! Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: otanswell on Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 16:53:53 i wonder if kate middletons uncle will be serving up the sniff and the hookers?
http://famewatcher.com/gary-goldsmith-pimp-and-drug-dealing-kate-middleton-uncle.html he comes into my shop all the time, hes actually a really nice guy Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: tans on Tuesday, April 19, 2011, 19:13:38 Im getting pissed off now. Everywhere i look its wedding this, wedding that.
Cunts. Im off down the bookies to see what odds id get of someone popping it in the ceremony Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, April 19, 2011, 19:18:32 I hope that Thatcher dies the same weekend.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, April 19, 2011, 20:06:27 I've been told that Jonathan Agnew is commentating on it which, if true, is brilliant
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Summerof69 on Tuesday, April 19, 2011, 20:13:08 All I can say is thank goodness there is more than 3 TV channels, which there was with the Charles and Di wedding.
I'll be avoiding BBC1/ITV1 and the news channels all day. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Samdy Gray on Tuesday, April 19, 2011, 20:27:52 The wife's planning on watching it. I think I might just have an all-dayer down the pub.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Batch on Tuesday, April 19, 2011, 20:42:30 At last a proper commemorative plate.
http://www.firebox.com/product/3425/Unofficial-Royal-Wedding-Plates?itc=271&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=WEDDING_361&src_t=nwt&src_id=361&via=nltop3 (http://www.firebox.com/product/3425/Unofficial-Royal-Wedding-Plates?itc=271&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=WEDDING_361&src_t=nwt&src_id=361&via=nltop3) Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Bennett on Tuesday, April 19, 2011, 20:49:15 i'm going to italy to escape this rubbish, and a town home game
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Tuesday, April 19, 2011, 21:35:13 The wife's planning on watching it. I think I might just have an all-dayer down the pub. Dont blame you. I'm considering doing the same tbh. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Arriba on Tuesday, April 19, 2011, 21:52:55 i can't help but think that kate may well be ruining her life by marrying into that family.
not that i give a fuck,as it's an extra day off work. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Simon Pieman on Tuesday, April 19, 2011, 21:52:56 guess what they'll probably be showing in the pub though
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Tuesday, April 19, 2011, 22:00:19 guess what they'll probably be showing in the pub though That would be fucking criminal but you're probably right. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: deltaincline on Tuesday, April 19, 2011, 22:25:34 i can't help but think that kate may well be ruining her life by marrying into that family. not that i give a fuck,as it's an extra day off work. She'll either shut the fuck up, toe the line and get knocked-up to order -while enjoying the considerable benefits of being wedded to 'the firm' - or she'll be toast. Why the fuck a quality bird like her would want to get involved with the biggest benefit-scrounging family on the planet, let alone tie the knot with one of the inbred, guffawing chinless cunts, is beyond me. She could do waaay better with much less hassle. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: reeves4england on Tuesday, April 19, 2011, 23:30:07 She'll either shut the fuck up, toe the line and get knocked-up to order -while enjoying the considerable benefits of being wedded to 'the firm' - or she'll be toast. Just a thought... maybe she likes him?Why the fuck a quality bird like her would want to get involved with the biggest benefit-scrounging family on the planet, let alone tie the knot with one of the inbred, guffawing chinless cunts, is beyond me. She could do waaay better with much less hassle. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Ginginho on Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 05:26:38 Just don't watch it, enjoy the day off and shut the fuck up moaning.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 07:10:31 Just a thought... maybe she likes him? I think delta's rehearsing his speech for when he jumps from a helicopter onto her balcony Milk Tray style and sweeps her off her feet. Stalkertastic!Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Ginginho on Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 07:16:46 With a bit of luck, they'll get divorced in a few months, he'll marry again, we'll get another day off and hopefully this cycle will continue for many years.
(Obviously this was said tongue in cheek, before the likes of deltaincline start to waffle on about the taxpayer paying for all these weddings, blah-de-blah-de-blah) Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: THE FLASH on Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 07:24:40 Not a big fan of the royals but being a hypocrite I am throwing a bbq piss up on the night.
Victor Mildew is coming along and we are going to let off fireworks and get pissed up. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Nick Bamosomi on Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 09:33:09 Sounds like the best way to celebrate to me Flash.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: herthab on Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 10:03:58 I'll be spending the extra long weekend in North Devon.
Thank you. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Ginginho on Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 10:14:22 I'll be spending the extra long weekend in North Devon. Thank you. You're welcome. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: ScillyRed on Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 10:16:40 Apparently Skinners have brought out a wedding beer called ''Kate loves Willy''
:pint: ::) Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: ghanimah on Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 15:04:04 Apparently we're all getting excited about whether Cameron will wear a lounge suit or tails.
Quote The issue of the Prime Minister’s attire had become one of the most hotly-debated subjects in the build-up to the big day after Downing Street said he would be wearing a work-style suit. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/royal-wedding/8463248/David-Cameron-will-wear-tails-to-royal-wedding-after-all.html Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: tans on Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 15:07:37 Apparently we're all getting excited about whether Cameron will wear a lounge suit or tails. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/royal-wedding/8463248/David-Cameron-will-wear-tails-to-royal-wedding-after-all.html Yeah im losing sleep over it Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 15:40:25 Apparently we're all getting excited about whether Cameron will wear a lounge suit or tails. Sometimes I wonder if just possibly some of our London-based media have ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE OF PERSPECTIVE OR ANY FUCKING IDEA WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON IN THE COUNTRY. Perhaps.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/royal-wedding/8463248/David-Cameron-will-wear-tails-to-royal-wedding-after-all.html Clearly, he should wear tails, it would be quite disgraceful to attend in some shabby "lounge" suit. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Nick Bamosomi on Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 17:24:46 I think they think that all this wedding crap is just what we all need to "cheer us up" ::)
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Doore on Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 17:38:56 I think they think that all this wedding crap is just what we all need to "cheer us up" ::) To be fair, I will be enjoying my day off immensely. Thank you, inbred big-nose and middle-class slut made good - I can now drink beer and have a barbie on a Friday. I used to hate the royals, but this has turned my views right around... Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: chalkies_shorts on Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 22:18:18 Fucking GBeRMAn cunts
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: tans on Friday, April 22, 2011, 14:30:28 The press are really excited about the royal wedding and dubbing Kate Middleton the new Diana, which is ironic as it's because of the press we need a new Diana....
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: BANGKOK RED on Friday, April 22, 2011, 14:40:17 :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: BANGKOK RED on Friday, April 22, 2011, 14:41:00 I'm stealing that for my facebook page
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Batch on Friday, April 22, 2011, 15:36:45 Quote from: Charlie Brooker The press are really excited about the royal wedding and dubbing Kate Middleton the new Diana, which is ironic as it's because of the press we need a new Diana.... :) Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: adje on Friday, April 22, 2011, 21:12:16 We dont need a new Diana-she turned everyone into simpering,over-sentimental gibbering heaps.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Friday, April 22, 2011, 21:14:14 We dont need a new Diana-she turned everyone into simpering,over-sentimental gibbering heaps. How can you say that about that lovely lady you heartless pig! :)Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Simon Pieman on Friday, April 22, 2011, 21:15:13 I think that's the point adje
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Friday, April 22, 2011, 21:42:15 Well, apparently, Princess Di was the 'Queen of all our hearts'....WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT MEAN EXACTLY????
Don't get me started on Diana. OK, she was a young woman whose life was ended tragically early with two young sons...truly awful (seriously. No piss taking) Beyond that though, 'national outpouring of grief'.....'queen of all our hearts'.....'the peoples' Princess' ...Elton John re-releasing Candle in the wind....fuck off. Please. Just fuck off. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Coca Fola on Friday, April 22, 2011, 21:43:29 Can someone get rid of this thread please. 10 pages show that clearly you all have some interest in it.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: reeves4england on Friday, April 22, 2011, 21:49:28 Can someone get rid of this thread please. 10 pages show that clearly you all have some interest in it. Why remove the thread?And the fact that there's 10 pages of moaning doesn't suggest people have an interest in it... it shows that this forum is largely populated but people who love a good moan, and what better opportunity?! Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: ghanimah on Friday, April 22, 2011, 21:51:30 Beyond that though, 'national outpouring of grief'.....'queen of all our hearts'.....'the peoples' Princess' ...Elton John re-releasing Candle in the wind....fuck off. Please. Just fuck off. You forgot the shit water feature as well Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Coca Fola on Friday, April 22, 2011, 21:54:05 Why remove the thread? Yeah but I'm sick of reading about it. This only contributes to it.And the fact that there's 10 pages of moaning doesn't suggest people have an interest in it... it shows that this forum is largely populated but people who love a good moan, and what better opportunity?! Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Friday, April 22, 2011, 21:58:59 Why remove the thread? Just because you don't agree with something or think it's a load of old shit does not necessarily constitute 'moaning' in my book.And the fact that there's 10 pages of moaning doesn't suggest people have an interest in it... it shows that this forum is largely populated but people who love a good moan, and what better opportunity?! Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: flammableBen on Friday, April 22, 2011, 22:00:05 Yeah but I'm sick of reading about it. This only contributes to it. Because I'm a hilarious guy, Coca Fola should now only be able to see the cricket section. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Nemo on Friday, April 22, 2011, 22:00:39 My Cricket section should not be sullied with that Ben.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Arriba on Friday, April 22, 2011, 22:02:45 Just because you don't agree with something or think it's a load of old shit does not necessarily constitute 'moaning' in my book. damn right. i'd love to slip kate middleton one by the way. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Friday, April 22, 2011, 22:27:47 Yeah, I'd love to hear her moaning 8)
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: BANGKOK RED on Friday, April 22, 2011, 22:30:40 People moaning about people moaning!
I am with arriba, I'd love to make that Middleton sort moan a tad. Most royals are a tad equine-esque but Kate's quite fit. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Talk Talk on Friday, April 22, 2011, 23:39:48 Can someone get rid of this thread please. 10 pages show that clearly you all have some interest in it. Indeed. Bread and circuses. Establishment diversions... Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: deltaincline on Saturday, April 23, 2011, 00:16:38 People moaning about people moaning! I am with arriba, I'd love to make that Middleton sort moan a tad. Most royals are a tad equine-esque but Kate's quite fit. I dont give a fuck about the wedding, who pays for it, or who attends it. I do give a fuck about cunts like Cameron 'allowing' me a day off, like I 'belong' to the govenment. I dont give a fuck about the Royal family, other than fundamentally objecting to them living on and profiteering from handouts from the public purse. If that's not benefit scrounging on a mahoosive fucking scale, I don't know what is. The only decent flange to marry into the house of Windor is Dianna. Ponce Charlie soon fucked her up by continuing to shag the old black-toothed slapper Camilla though - which says all you'd ever want to know about that cunt. Middleton is definately in the same class as Dianna; posh and fit. Form an orderly queue behind me;-) Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Ardiles on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, 12:18:51 Please, please make it stop.
Royal wedding: Kate Middleton cross-stitch pattern (http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2011/apr/26/royal-wedding-kate-middleton-cross-stitch-pattern) I'm not in the best frame of mind anyway, but three more days of this is going to send me over the edge. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: wiggy on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, 12:23:10 I am working on Friday as I haven't given myself the day off.
I don't buy a daily paper, and don't watch much telly, so I can safely say it if wasn't for this thread I would know naff all about the royal wedding. She does seem quite fit though, wasted on a slack jawed toff. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: tans on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, 13:31:25 I'm not in the best frame of mind anyway, but three more days of this is going to send me over the edge. Youre not the only one. I see on the bbc site some sad cunt is camping outside the abbey so he can get a good view. Fucking weirdos Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, 13:33:57 I've still got a lot of organising to do for my street party.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: tans on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, 13:40:41 Have you made that brum brum video yet
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, 13:42:03 the what video?
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: sonicyouth on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, 13:42:45 I have got Friday off work. I am delighted about the wedding.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: tans on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, 13:45:29 the what video? You mustve said on here when you were pissed. You were going to make a video montage of diana,mercedes and tunnels. Then have a soundtrack making a brum brum sound over the top. You were going to post it on youtube or something Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, 13:45:53 haha. that's a genius idea. Shame I don't remember.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Samdy Gray on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, 13:53:38 Anyone see the piss-taking program on C4 last night?
Watching those Z-listers think they'd been invited to the wedding was hilarious. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, 16:41:32 It's supposed to piss down saturday. It will literally rain on their parade!!
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Samdy Gray on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, 17:25:40 Apart from the fact they're getting married on Friday.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, 17:26:06 Thats what I meant to say 8)
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, 17:29:54 This man has some serious issues. And is possibly a eunuch.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-13193685 Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, 17:37:22 Fans "camp out" indeed :)
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Batch on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, 18:35:20 Right, I'm off on my summer hols now. See you after the wedding.
http://www.camproyale.co.uk/campsite/ No not really. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, 20:30:20 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhLifRJrIpY
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: leefer on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, 20:32:32 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhLifRJrIpY :DTitle: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Saxondale on Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 11:58:00 NEWSTHUMP REPORT
Royal Wedding becoming self-aware Signs that the Royal Wedding is becoming self-aware have prompted fears that it could attack and attain world domination by Thursday, a whole day earlier than previously believed. Televisions across the world have started broadcasting programmes about the Royal Wedding against the will of many viewers, and 1,000 members of the armed forces are believed to have taken part in a full-scale procession this morning at 0500 BST. “Where am I?” asked one bemused soldier. “One minute me and some of the lads are furiously masturbating onto a digestive biscuit, and the next I’m marching around outside a big church.” Early indications that the wedding had become capable of acting of its own free will became apparent on Monday when the first royal enthusiast began camping out in front of Westminster Abbey. Royal Wedding knows where you live John Loughrey revealed that he had no idea how he got to the venue for the wedding, but said he had become overwhelmed with an urge to set up camp and spend four days pissing in a bottle. Office workers have also expressed concern that the Royal Wedding has caused co-workers to decorate their office in an attempt to involve people in something that they really couldn’t give a fuck about. “There’s Union Jacks all around my desk and red, white and blue balloons everywhere,” revealed a senior administrator for a leading insurer. “I’m not sure how decorating the office to look like a BNP Family Fun Day is supposed to lift my spirits.” Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: flammableBen on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 08:05:34 I love Stewart Lee. You should all read this, I know it's long, and that half of you are thicker than the other half, but read it anyway. Make the effort.
(from http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2011/apr/27/royal-wedding-secret-kate-wills) Quote The selection of Kate Middleton, a lowly commoner drawn from the very dregs of society, as Prince William's bride has been the subject of great speculation, much of it thinly veiled snobbery. But Britain is broken. Social mobility is at a historic low, state education and public healthcare are in crisis, and our own prime minister has blamed the truculent immigrant and his concealed wife for our lack of national cohesion. Once upon a time, royal marriages were political acts that forged links between different nations. Instead, William and Kate's wedding will bind this nation to itself, and in marrying so very far beneath himself, I believe the young prince has made a heroic and deliberate sacrifice to achieve this end. Pause for a moment. Imagine being Prince William. Imagine knowing that the best justification most rational people could come up with for your heavily subsidised existence was that you were a symbolic figure. And symbolic of what, the boy must wonder. History? The land? The nation itself? A notion of refined nobility? Grace under pressure? Or perhaps some abstract idea of temporal continuity? Unable to escape being a symbolic figure, the prince's recent activities suggest he has chosen instead to embrace the role in the most profound way imaginable. And, I believe, this is why the wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton itself seems symbolic on an admirable and unprecedented level. Jessie L Weston's 1920 study of Holy Grail mythology, From Ritual to Romance, pictures Britain as a wasteland, an image appropriated by TS Eliot to describe the aftermath of the first world war. The Fisher King must search the devastated terrain for the Holy Grail, and drink from it to heal the land. Broken Britain is that wasted land. William is that Fisher King. Kate Middleton is that lovely grail, full not of the blood of the crucified Christ, but of the blood of the Middletons, who run a children's partyware business in Berkshire. And Kate's wedding to wise William is a ritual that may help to fix what David Cameron's vision of the Big Society so far has not. For in choosing Kate, a simple girl from a school near Swindon, as his bride, William is in fact taking each and every British subject – man, woman, old, young, black, white, Christian and Muslim – into his royal bed, and binding us all to each other in the white heat of his princely passion. Kate was educated at Marlborough College in Wiltshire. It is a private school, yes, but it is no Eton, and its most famous alumni are little more than flannelled fools: the comedian Jack Whitehall, the children's author Lauren Child, and the pop musician Chris de Burgh, whose 1976 Christmas hit A Spaceman Came Travelling describes an alien being's disappointment in the shortcomings of human society – disappointments it appears William shares, and is trying to address in his own esoteric way. But his motives for plucking a bride from such an inauspicious establishment are, I believe, twofold, and we must admire and accept the occult reasoning behind his selfless choice. First of all, Marlborough College, where Kate Middleton flushed into womanhood, is set in a magical landscape that has been declared a world heritage site, being only five miles from the exact centre of the Avebury stone circle. Perhaps Kate's growing body absorbed the magical energies of the region. Perhaps it did not. It does not matter. She is from, and she is of, the ancient wetland. The arrangement of the 6,000-year-old circle, and the stone rows, burial chambers and mounds that surround it, is explicitly symbolic, explicitly sexual and explicitly ritualistic, and as such it shares the same transformative agenda as Friday's royal wedding. In Avebury, the West Kennet Avenue, a long row of erotically paired stones, uncoils snake-like from the circle, as if to penetrate nearby Silbury Hill, a fecund 37-metre-high female belly, which rises from the marsh to meet it. The prince has taken his lowly bride from within this charged landscape, where our ancestors celebrated the union of man and woman in stone and earth, and began the communal processes that forged a nation from their descendents, the broken nation that William the Fisher King must now heal. Our shaman-prince could not have chosen a better receptacle for his magical purposes than Kate Middleton, a peasant-spawned serf-girl, sodden with the primordial mire of the Swindon-shadowed swamplands. Secondly, in choosing a commoner for his bride, William gives hope to millions of socially disenfranchised Britons. Only two Tory generations ago, the prime minister Margaret Thatcher was proud to proclaim herself "a grocer's daughter". A mere 20 years since she passed power on to John Major, a garden gnome salesman with six O-levels, it is impossible to imagine either in government today, composed, as it is, principally of former members of the elite Oxford vomiting society the Bullingdon Club. The state-schools system is stretched to the limit; the withdrawal of further education grants deters poorer students; and government contributions to the Bookstart scheme, which gives books to children who might otherwise have none, have been halved. It is not possible to imagine a Thatcher ever getting out of Lincolnshire today, let alone becoming prime minister. But in snatching Kate from the gutter, William stooped even lower than he would have done had he chosen Margaret Thatcher for his bride. Kate's parents aren't even grocers. They sell novelty hats and paper plates. It's no coincidence that as genuine social mobility in broken Britain is eroded, so commoners turn to the National Lottery, The X Factor and Britain's Got Talent. Winning them represents the only chance real people have to change their circumstances significantly. It could be you. And, like some giant illuminated penis flying over the rooftops of suburban homes and frothing at random passing women, William has pointed himself at Kate Middleton, the Susan Boyle of social mobility. In declaring her his princess, he brings hope of real change to millions of people denied a decent education and the means to better themselves, to millions of tiny babies denied even books, that one day they too could be randomly rewarded with untold wealth and privilege. The wedding of my wife and I was a small affair, with 40 or so guests. We were not required to arrange our day along magical or symbolic lines, though admittedly some aspects of the Catholic wedding ceremony confused me, and my wife is yet to explain the tradition whereby I have been obliged ever since to sleep alone each night on the toilet. But as a symbolic figure, poor Prince William's wedding is hostage to political expediency. Consider the faces he will see as he and Kate make their solemn vows. From the world of government, the prime minister and Mrs David Cameron, and the deputy prime minister and Ms Miriam González Durántez, holding whichever suit the prime minister has chosen not to wear; from the faith communities, the Reverend Gregorius, Anil Bhanot, Malcolm Deeboo of the Zoroastrians, The Venerable Bogoda Seelawimala Nayaka Thera, Obi-Wan Kenobi, Optimus Prime, Yog-Sothoth, Captain Marvel and Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor; and from the twin spheres of entertainment and sport, Mr Ben Fogle, Mr David Beckham and Mrs David Beckham, Mr Madonna Louise Ciccone, and Sir Elton Hercules John and Mr Sir Elton Hercules John. Candles in the wind all. But as he gazes at this golden shower of dignitaries, it is William who will have the last guffaw. He knows that this was not so much a wedding as a psychic rescue operation, a healing ritual for broken Britain, a pantomime of hope for the terminally hopeless. In taking Kate Middleton as his bride, Prince William, more than anyone in any position of power in Britain today, has tried at least to do something to help. I hope sincerely that both of them are very happy. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: tans on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 08:09:27 Madonna is going?
FFS i bet she goes to malawi to choose a kid to take Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 08:16:16 Madonna is going? She'll probably just stop at Barnado's on the way over. It's important to accessorise correctly for these kinds of occasionsFFS i bet she goes to malawi to choose a kid to take Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Ardiles on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 08:30:57 I get a little tired, to be honest, of hearing that William is marrying a 'commoner'. This wedding isn't the Prince & the Pauper...it's Eton & Marlborough. And despite what Stewart Lee says (tongue in cheek, I know), Marlborough College isn't any old 'school near Swindon'...I don't think you'll find Commonweal and Ridgeway on their rugby fixture list. It's a top public school that only very wealthy people get to send their kids to. Kate Middleton inhabits a world that is very different to the world that most of us live in.
The social mobility point is interesting though. While Kate Middleton is 100% sloane, her grandparents certainly were not. She only got to rub shoulders with the prince and his crowd in the first place because her parents were very successful in running their business and moved up the social ladder very quickly. So quickly, in fact, that a lot of the old-fashioned British class snobbery - that was meant to be a thing of the past - has come to the fore again. Read the papers from a few years ago...the way KM and her sister were tagged the 'Wisteria Sisters', the way their (ex-stewardess) mother was nicknamed 'Doors to Manual'. There are folk out there, mostly 'old money' who still bridle when 'new money' starts to assert itself. As if making money yourself is somehow less honourable than inheriting it. Twenty-odd years after John Major's 'Classless Society', I think it's nothing of the sort. Good luck to both of them, anyway. I took a short detour through Admiralty Arch and down the Mall on my walk to work this morning, and I've never seen so many Union Jacks. (Which made me realise how little you see the UJ these days now the St George's Cross has taken over. It's like the red squirrel being pushed out by the grey squirrel.) Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: donkey on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 08:53:06 I get a little tired, to be honest, of hearing that William is marrying a 'commoner'. This wedding isn't the Prince & the Pauper...it's Eton & Marlborough. And despite what Stewart Lee says (tongue in cheek, I know), Marlborough College isn't any old 'school near Swindon'...I don't think you'll find Commonweal and Ridgeway on their rugby fixture list. It's a top public school that only very wealthy people get to send their kids to. Kate Middleton inhabits a world that is very different to the world that most of us live in. The social mobility point is interesting though. While Kate Middleton is 100% sloane, her grandparents certainly were not. She only got to rub shoulders with the prince and his crowd in the first place because her parents were very successful in running their business and moved up the social ladder very quickly. So quickly, in fact, that a lot of the old-fashioned British class snobbery - that was meant to be a thing of the past - has come to the fore again. Read the papers from a few years ago...the way KM and her sister were tagged the 'Wisteria Sisters', the way their (ex-stewardess) mother was nicknamed 'Doors to Manual'. There are folk out there, mostly 'old money' who still bridle when 'new money' starts to assert itself. As if making money yourself is somehow less honourable than inheriting it. Twenty-odd years after John Major's 'Classless Society', I think it's nothing of the sort. Good luck to both of them, anyway. I took a short detour through Admiralty Arch and down the Mall on my walk to work this morning, and I've never seen so many Union Jacks. (Which made me realise how little you see the UJ these days now the St George's Cross has taken over. It's like the red squirrel being pushed out by the grey squirrel.) Agree with that. Commoner, for fucks sake! Oh, and classless society, big society? We all know to the tories there is no such thing as society. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: tans on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 09:01:00 Kate middletons mum kicked off in my brothers shop.
She was saying "dont you know who i am? Im kate middletons mother" He turned round and said "whos that?" :D Apparently she then went right off on one and was a stuck up cunt by all accounts Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: donkey on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 09:13:03 Kate middletons mum kicked off in my brothers shop. She was saying "dont you know who i am? Im kate middletons mother" He turned round and said "whos that?" :D Apparently she then went right off on one and was a stuck up babe by all accounts Anyone whoever says 'don't you know who I am?', well its quite sad really. I served Colin Montgomerie once in a shop and I had to ring his card details through as he was over his limit (this was about one month after his first Ryder Cup appearance). He was polite, courteous and never once tried on the 'do you know who I am?' line, just accepted I had my job to do. Nice bloke. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: tans on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 11:29:29 Prince Harry's Best Man Speech:-"What do me, Wills and the England Rugby Team have in common?
We've all been inside Princess Diana." Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: wiggy on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 11:57:37 The Lamb Inn in Devizes is a royal wedding free - it has often been my haven and will be so again tomorrow.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: jayohaitchenn on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 11:59:27 Prince Harry's Best Man Speech:-"What do me, Wills and the England Rugby Team have in common? We've all been inside Princess Diana." When the news of Princess Dianas death hit, she was all over the radio. And the steering wheel, and the dashboard, and the gear stick, and the handbrake... Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Batch on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 12:06:58 Kate middletons mum kicked off in my brothers shop. Doesn't you brother run an Anne Summers shop? Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 13:26:09 Absolutely pathetic:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-13223428 Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: tans on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 13:33:00 Excellent.
He'll just bomb them instead Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 13:43:25 Absolutely pathetic: Why?http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-13223428 Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 13:53:56 Why? Because it's stupid gesture politics, purely based on the contents of this morning's front pages. It's not even a coherent policy - why not ban the Yemeni and Bahrain ambassadors too if it's based on principle? Not to mention the Iranian, N Korean, Zimbabwean ambassador etc etc. It's precisely the same kind of knee-jerk reaction to one day's headlines as a substitute for actual policy that Blair used to get so rightly slated for - the Daily Mail may as well run the bloody Foreign Office.Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 13:54:54 Haha that perked me up. I just wanted to read one of your rants.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 13:56:47 Haha that perked me up. I just wanted to read one of your rants. :D It has actually annoyed me way more than it should do. I couldn't give a fuck who goes to the damn thing, but for some reason this just really irritated meTitle: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: axs on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 15:26:10 I love Stewart Lee. You should all read this, I know it's long, and that half of you are thicker than the other half, but read it anyway. Make the effort. (from http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2011/apr/27/royal-wedding-secret-kate-wills) TLDR Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: yeo on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 19:21:26 Ive just been looking at some of the Facebook and Twitter stuff from some of the anti wedding protesty groups,these guys are spectacularly paranoid.Silent phone calls,mysterious phone outages,Facebook updates deleting themselves and allsorts.Fascinating spooks like stuff 8)
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Costanza on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 19:22:39 But are they taking tomorrow off?
:sherlock: Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 20:04:15 I have actually heard more about this wedding from Tans who funnily enough hates it.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: DV on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 20:18:27 seconded
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: flammableBen on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 20:23:53 I'm just making up some "Princesses still have to wear seatbelts" posters for my street party.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: flammableBen on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 20:25:07 should it be "princesses still need to wear seatbelts" I'm too drunk for wordy stuff now so could do with the advice of the tef.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: flammableBen on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 20:26:36 "Landmines don't kill Princesses, car crashes do"
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: tans on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 20:27:54 Haha
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 20:31:31 "Princesses make ideal dashboard ornaments"
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: flammableBen on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 20:32:11 "Princesses make ideal dashboard ornaments" Too far dude. They'll be kids there. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Batch on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 20:33:03 Don't be as dead as a Dodi, belt up.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Bogus Dave on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 22:46:40 should it be "princesses still need to wear seatbelts" I'm too drunk for wordy stuff now so could do with the advice of the tef. I don't care. I'm stealing that Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 23:53:30 I'm going to print Ben's slogans out onto that special iron-on paper you can get and make the kids special Royal Wedding T-shirts for them to wear tomorrow. Superb!
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: flammableBen on Thursday, April 28, 2011, 23:58:17 I've just gone and pinned a few on the lamp posts. I was going to put pictures, but there are kids about and I'm running out of printer ink.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: tans on Friday, April 29, 2011, 07:50:57 At least theyre keeping with their german roots.
Hitler married eva braun this date too Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: flammableBen on Friday, April 29, 2011, 10:12:22 Come on Al-Queda / IRA/ Pissed up bloke with access to explosives.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: flammableBen on Friday, April 29, 2011, 10:14:30 I don't really want to encourage explosive death, I'm just trying to karma myself for what I'm doing now.
Urgh Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Costanza on Friday, April 29, 2011, 10:20:08 Come on Al-Queda / IRA/ Pissed up bloke with access to explosives. Wait for the group photo... The prophecy according to the film King Ralph [url width=900 height=506]http://cdn.mymovies.ge/backdrops/eca/4bc930d5017a3c57fe013eca/king-ralph-original.jpg[/url] Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: DV on Friday, April 29, 2011, 10:24:01 are all the women just having a who has the worst most stupid looking hat contest?
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: adje on Friday, April 29, 2011, 10:39:57 I love Stewart Lee. You should all read this, I know it's long, and that half of you are thicker than the other half, but read it anyway. Make the effort. (from http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2011/apr/27/royal-wedding-secret-kate-wills) I've never looked upon Silbury as a "fecund female belly" but I bloody will from now on. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Arriba on Friday, April 29, 2011, 11:04:23 kate's sister is fit.
harry will be smashing it later i reckon Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: wiggy on Friday, April 29, 2011, 11:32:27 Is it over yet??
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: leefer on Friday, April 29, 2011, 11:33:31 Is it over yet?? Fuck me they only married an hour ago,but give it time. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Friday, April 29, 2011, 11:39:08 Fuck me they only married an hour ago,but give it time. :DTitle: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: joteddyred on Friday, April 29, 2011, 11:48:16 There's some very random people out interviewing in the crowds. Fearne Cotton seems to pop up everwhere and what does Matt Allright of Rogue Traders have to do with anything?
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: leefer on Friday, April 29, 2011, 11:50:53 No doubt secretly filming people,making sure there aint no dodgy program sellers.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Batch on Friday, April 29, 2011, 11:51:00 what does Matt Allright of Rogue Traders have to do with anything? Assessing the chances of Middleton allowing William entry through the tradesman's entrance tonight? Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: joteddyred on Friday, April 29, 2011, 11:56:48 Assessing the chances of Middleton allowing William entry through the tradesman's entrance tonight? :DEdith Bowman has just popped up trying cocktails and subsequently been told off by Huw Edwards for not having self discipline! Don't panic Huw they were non alcoholic. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: LucienSanchez on Friday, April 29, 2011, 11:57:34 I really don't like Huw Edwards
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Chubbs on Friday, April 29, 2011, 12:16:02 all ive seen on facebook if fucking wedding updates. the people who care, are watching it, the people who don't, are not. we dont need running commentary on facebook.
get a life Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Posh Red on Friday, April 29, 2011, 13:44:26 Well I for one am grateful to the couple for getting married today.
Meant that I could watch the NFL draft last night, and not have to get up early for work :) Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Freddies Ferret on Friday, April 29, 2011, 13:47:12 all ive seen on facebook if fucking wedding updates. the people who care, are watching it, the people who don't, are not. we dont need running commentary on facebook. get a life One should fuck off Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Ginginho on Friday, April 29, 2011, 14:17:33 Well, I thought it was really good actually.
Wills & Harry have modernised the Royal Family somewhat as now they're not just seen as a bunch of crusty old folk. Never really been into the whole Royal Family thing, but thought it was really nice seeing everyone there waving the Union Jack and enjoying the day, makes you proud to be British. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, April 29, 2011, 14:25:17 Well, I thought it was really good actually. Wills & Harry have modernised the Royal Family somewhat as now they're not just seen as a bunch of crusty old folk. Never really been into the whole Royal Family thing, but thought it was really nice seeing everyone there waving the Union Jack and enjoying the day, makes you proud to be British. Think the Union has probably had its day....fully expect it too fracture within the next 10-15, we can't keep paying for the Scots and Welsh. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: yeo on Friday, April 29, 2011, 14:38:15 I enjoyed it.
Im going recreate by Marrying my dogs (to each other,im not marrying them that'd be weird) then parade them through Rodbourne in an old pram..its going to be ace! Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: tans on Friday, April 29, 2011, 14:39:01 I had a dump.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Ginginho on Friday, April 29, 2011, 14:43:45 I enjoyed it. Im going recreate by Marrying my dogs (to each other,im not marrying them that'd be weird) then parade them through Rodbourne in an old pram..its going to be ace! Ooh, can I come? That sounds like fun! Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Coca Fola on Friday, April 29, 2011, 15:14:09 Am I the only one who didn't watch it?
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: yeo on Friday, April 29, 2011, 15:15:12 Ooh, can I come? That sounds like fun! do you have a Top Hat? Can your Cat ride a Horse? Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, April 29, 2011, 15:17:05 Am I the only one who didn't watch it? I wouldn't have thought so...in fact I don't know anybody who did. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Ginginho on Friday, April 29, 2011, 15:17:10 I can make a top hat, I can strap one of my cats to a horse, we'll make it work.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Friday, April 29, 2011, 15:44:51 I can make a top hat, I can strap one of my cats to a horse, we'll make it work. See, that's the kind of "all in it together, can do" attitude that's made this nation great and the royal wedding has brought out in us all once again. Bah to the naysayers!Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Saxondale on Friday, April 29, 2011, 15:46:00 So Kates sister has an ass appreciation facebook page now.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Pippa-Middleton-Ass-Appreciation-Society/183120471735513 Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Friday, April 29, 2011, 15:47:06 She needs to get an arse (NB English spelling please for English arses) first
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Saxondale on Friday, April 29, 2011, 15:50:33 Its the first step in the americanisation of our great royals tushes. They'll be commenting on the queens quim next.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Friday, April 29, 2011, 15:51:31 Tushes? Tushes? Sort yourself out, Hollywood
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Saxondale on Friday, April 29, 2011, 15:52:09 Im sorry. Fanny
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Saxondale on Friday, April 29, 2011, 15:55:12 Or should I say Im sorry. Posterior.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Friday, April 29, 2011, 15:57:46 Or should I say Im sorry. Posterior. That's better. And don't call me a fanny again. Twat :)Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: STFC4LIFE on Friday, April 29, 2011, 16:05:40 Sorry, pointless and drunken reply.
But how fit is Pippa Middleton? Wow Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Saxondale on Friday, April 29, 2011, 16:12:43 That's better. And don't call me a fanny again. Twat :) Im sorry Mr D. You butt booty rear-end badonkadonk arse balloon knot behind bum whoopie cake patootie Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Friday, April 29, 2011, 18:28:55 I'm not sure whether to be offended or impressed :)
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: donkey on Friday, April 29, 2011, 18:40:37 Well I for one am grateful to the couple for getting married today. Meant that I could watch the NFL draft last night, and not have to get up early for work :) Aye. Who's your team? Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Saxondale on Friday, April 29, 2011, 18:54:51 Im sorry Mr D. You butt booty rear-end badonkadonk arse balloon knot behind bum whoopie cake patootie Google is an incredible thing isnt it. Incidentally the person who told me about middletons arse prompted me to say, Ill have to 'google that ass' which she pointed out was a very good name for a rap song. If I get bored later I will write that song and make me a million dollars! Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, April 29, 2011, 19:54:03 I believe one noted TEFer may have been keeping quiet about a street party in his neck of the woods....
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Costanza on Friday, April 29, 2011, 19:58:25 I watched it, made some "witty" observations on Twitter and then got on him my day.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: tans on Friday, April 29, 2011, 20:00:48 I believe one noted TEFer may have been keeping quiet about a street party in his neck of the woods.... Spill then. Are they swindonian Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Posh Red on Friday, April 29, 2011, 20:03:14 So have they televised the royal first shag yet?
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: jonny72 on Friday, April 29, 2011, 20:06:00 They've already got the "Official Album of the Royal Wedding" album for purchase on iTunes. With all the music and vows and all that shit from today. How the fuck did they do that so quickly? That would have taken a month when Charles and Di got hitched.
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Friday, April 29, 2011, 20:07:45 I believe one noted TEFer may have been keeping quiet about a street party in his neck of the woods.... We have a closet Hyacinth Bouquet in our midst!Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Batch on Friday, April 29, 2011, 20:18:02 I believe one noted TEFer may have been keeping quiet about a street party in his neck of the woods.... Define street party.... Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: stfcinbmth on Friday, April 29, 2011, 20:19:26 They've already got the "Official Album of the Royal Wedding" album for purchase on iTunes. With all the music and vows and all that shit from today. How the fuck did they do that so quickly? That would have taken a month when Charles and Di got hitched. That is bloody quick. My other halfs mum went in for an eye op Thursday, and she had a check up this morning, she wanted to watch the wedding so I've had to record it on the sat box from 8am to 2pm(11.something gb), ftp said file from box to pc(2.5hrs) encode it to mpeg(4.5hrs) think it's still running now, then encode to DVD(when it's finished) burn to dvd, rush out to get some dual layer DVD's(much too big for 4.7gb dvd) Then stick in the post when it's done. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrr Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: pauld on Friday, April 29, 2011, 20:31:26 That is bloody quick. My other halfs mum went in for an eye op Thursday, and she had a check up this morning, she wanted to watch the wedding so I've had to record it on the sat box from 8am to 2pm(11.something gb), ftp said file from box to pc(2.5hrs) encode it to mpeg(4.5hrs) think it's still running now, then encode to DVD(when it's finished) burn to dvd, rush out to get some dual layer DVD's(much too big for 4.7gb dvd) Then stick in the post when it's done. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrr You should tell her you got all of it except for the bit at the end where Kate mooned the crowd from the balconyTitle: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Saxondale on Friday, April 29, 2011, 20:34:42 And the royal 'tits or face moment'. Or is that just in the x rated version?
We paid for the bloody thing we should at least get to see that. Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: joteddyred on Friday, April 29, 2011, 20:37:16 Didn't watch the whole thing, but a fair bit of it and was more interested than I thought I'd be.
Most enjoyable part though has been out in the street all afternoon drinking with the neighbours. Funny how little you know about people you have shared a road with for 9 years. I've learnt lots today while the drink was flowing and it's most entertaining seeing some of them who normally seem very strait laced very drunk and silly. My next door neighbour went in at 7pm disgusted with his wife due to her drunkeness and then ordered her in around 9pm- highly amusing and a good time had by all. Royal weddings should happen more often! Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: A Gent Orange on Saturday, April 30, 2011, 09:34:52 Blimey they have got the commerative stamps out already...
http://www.b3ta.com/board/10404577 Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Ginginho on Saturday, April 30, 2011, 11:47:28 The uncensored wedding DVD is going to be great!
[url width=500 height=363]http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lkfvr2JPQl1qbow88o1_500.jpg[/url] Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Freddies Ferret on Saturday, April 30, 2011, 19:35:11 that picture is brilliant
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Ginginho on Tuesday, May 3, 2011, 11:56:57 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kav0FEhtLug
Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: herthab on Tuesday, May 3, 2011, 15:37:38 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kav0FEhtLug I didn't watch any of the actual wedding, but it couldn't have been as good as that! Title: Re: Royal Wedding OMG Post by: Peter Gibbons on Saturday, February 16, 2013, 09:12:48 http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=UtVz8SRHiYs
|