suttonred
Offline
Posts: 12510
|
|
« Reply #360 on: Sunday, January 4, 2015, 12:02:46 » |
|
Yeah its the current other 91 league teams. I actually went down a few last couple of years, then back up again when Cambridge and Luton came back up last season.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kaufman
|
|
« Reply #361 on: Sunday, January 4, 2015, 12:03:47 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
REDBUCK
|
|
« Reply #362 on: Sunday, January 4, 2015, 12:09:23 » |
|
So where's the Pen, not considered important then. Looks to me as if Branco lacked support on both those goals.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Saxondale
Offline
Posts: 6395
|
|
« Reply #363 on: Sunday, January 4, 2015, 12:12:34 » |
|
Not really the best highlights. The game only lasted 45 minutes by the looks of it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Never knowingly overstated.
|
|
|
FormerlyPlymRed
Offline
Posts: 1944
|
|
« Reply #364 on: Sunday, January 4, 2015, 12:19:39 » |
|
I'm still certain willo's goal had a hefty deflection.
Should have won the game after first half performance but first 20 of 2nd half was awful. Swift promising, good away support, good fightback and a decent terrace.
Fleetwood club bar very good and very friendly people up there, will be going again next time we play.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
suttonred
Offline
Posts: 12510
|
|
« Reply #365 on: Sunday, January 4, 2015, 12:19:53 » |
|
No deflection on Williams goal, superb finish.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32349
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #366 on: Sunday, January 4, 2015, 12:23:38 » |
|
Might be difficult with wages as he's on a contract from the old regime but we need to try and get Williams signed up asap. Classy player and much more consistent now.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ronnie21
Offline
Posts: 6146
The Mighty Hankerton
|
|
« Reply #367 on: Sunday, January 4, 2015, 12:38:39 » |
|
Definitely too much space allowed for their goals, the second one was criminal!! Should Wes get beaten on the near post for the first?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Gnasher
Offline
Posts: 5204
Prefers animals to people (in a non sexual way)
|
|
« Reply #368 on: Sunday, January 4, 2015, 12:51:53 » |
|
Yeah its the current other 91 league teams. I actually went down a few last couple of years, then back up again when Cambridge and Luton came back up last season.
I've done 71 of the current 91, if you include old grounds.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Cats are better than dogs FACT
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55457
|
|
« Reply #369 on: Sunday, January 4, 2015, 12:56:13 » |
|
Definitely too much space allowed for their goals, the second one was criminal!! Should Wes get beaten on the near post for the first?
Not often you see wes let those in. I think he'll be disappointed. Branco levered off the ball too easily too. Their second looked a good finish, yes Brandco cocked up but the scorer was unmarked anyway. Lovely goal from willo.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Exiled Bob
Offline
Posts: 1514
Likes a moan
|
|
« Reply #370 on: Sunday, January 4, 2015, 13:09:36 » |
|
Just watched the highlights and, going by what I saw, I have to say:
- the game should have been wrapped up in the first half - Swift definitely dived for the penalty - Foderingham should have saved the shot for the first goal - beaten at the near post from a tight angle.... - Crap defending for their second goal. - Williams' goal was either fantastic skill or a fluke.....not sure which, but it looks like he meant it on the highlights. I couldn't see any sign of a deflection.
Not sure why everyone blames Branco, certainly for the second as he was marking another player at the time. Nobody picked up the goal scorer.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brocklesby red
Offline
Posts: 661
|
|
« Reply #371 on: Sunday, January 4, 2015, 13:16:47 » |
|
I was stood right behind the goal and Williams flick got a huge deflection off Roberts back.Shows how you need to see things from different angles though because from the highlights it looks a superb finish
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55457
|
|
« Reply #372 on: Sunday, January 4, 2015, 13:18:42 » |
|
- Swift definitely dived for the penalty
Paraphrasing, in the post match interview he said he felt contact with his ankle and went down. Later said similar about the second shout and it was up to the referee. No doubt this attitude is commonplace all through football. It still irks me. That's not meant as me getting on a players back before he's hardly played for us though..
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kerry red
|
|
« Reply #373 on: Sunday, January 4, 2015, 13:26:50 » |
|
Got to say, debates on all the 'cheating' that goes on in football doesn't really interest or bother me.
We all know it goes on in every match by every team so you pays yer money and takes yer chance whether you gain or lose in any particular game.
Saying that, I still get a warm feeling thinking back to the City game!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
THE FLASH
Offline
Posts: 9426
Quick as a Flash!
|
|
« Reply #374 on: Sunday, January 4, 2015, 22:38:00 » |
|
I've done 71 of the current 91, if you include old grounds.
In my book you have done 71... I think there are rules for the official 92 that you must do current grounds. I'm on 88 but that includes old grounds like Maine Road etc.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Clems Army!
|
|
|
|