Not comparable situations are they though? At the time Vigs had 18 months left on his contract and whatever his attitude issues (which were widely acknowledged at the time), he was still a saleable asset that "Flitters" chose to devalue to the detriment of the club. That's very different to the situation now when we're a few weeks away from the end of his contract and he's refused to renew. But you know all that and choose to ignore the facts that don't suit you, as per.
Vigs certainly has never really been a saleable asset.... had he been he'd have been sold, that's why Power bought him.
He has been an average Div 3/4 stopper, with a bad attitude, that you probably don't want if looking for promotion.
This is about opinion... and in my opinion we should have cut the losses on Vigs and got rid.... if in your opinion we shouldn't then fine.