larwood
The girl least likely to.
 Offline
Posts: 4653
|
 |
« on: Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 12:12:41 » |
|
Sounds like the welsh wizard won't be playing at the oval,he's having to go in an oxygen tent twice a day.  I think he would be a real loss for us,he's been fantastic. Slightly better news is Punters constant bitching,the aussies call us whingers,but their captain is whinging for his country at the moment and its hilarious.  I think he needs to start worring about something else,like his teams batting and not our use of subs,its a bit rich all this moaning about the spirt of the game,when for years the aussies have been sledging like dirty thick fuckers. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I was a small, fat child in a welfare house
There was only one thing I ever dreamed about
And fate has just
Handed it to me - whoopee
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 12:14:06 » |
|
They dont like it up em', the sub was used inside the regulations so i dont know what that cunt Ponting is on about!. :evil:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Titch
Offline
Posts: 1224
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 12:15:48 » |
|
Ponting is a twat. Full stop! Its about time!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
y wings are like a shield of steel!
|
|
|
STFC_Chris
Charlie Croker
Offline
Posts: 1472
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 12:29:03 » |
|
Tremlett or Collingwood seem to be most likely to be the replacement. I'm not all that keen on having Tremlett into the side for his debut, in the last ashes test. Has Collingwood played in a test before? He's got 900+ runs this year and a decent bowling average, so would probably be my choice.
Other than that, who else is there? Caddick is past it, Gough's retired...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 12:30:53 » |
|
Tremlett or Collingwood seem to be most likely to be the replacement. I'm not all that keen on having Tremlett into the side for his debut, in the last ashes test. Has Collingwood played in a test before? He's got 900+ runs this year and a decent bowling average, so would probably be my choice.
Other than that, who else is there? Caddick is past it, Gough's retired... Nope he hasnt but id sooner have him than Tremlett just becuase he can bowl and bat and he wont drop much.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Kinky Tom
Snow Master Sandwich King.
Offline
Posts: 8887
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 12:30:55 » |
|
Get Caddick in as a one of Test appearance - he's got experience and is still capable of taking wickets.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
larwood
The girl least likely to.
Offline
Posts: 4653
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 12:37:29 » |
|
Get Caddick in as a one of Test appearance
 I think gough coming in would be more likely than caddick.  Collingwood is the bloke who should get the nod,he can bowl well and bat well too,giving tremlett his test debut against the aussies in a deciding test match could backfire. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I was a small, fat child in a welfare house
There was only one thing I ever dreamed about
And fate has just
Handed it to me - whoopee
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 15993
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 13:25:00 » |
|
I'd pick Collingwood. A perfectly adequate bowler who can also bat.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 13:36:01 » |
|
I'd go for Collingwood as well, he's a pretty good fielder isn't he?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
larwood
The girl least likely to.
Offline
Posts: 4653
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 14:01:20 » |
|
he's a pretty good fielder isn't he
He's probably the best in the England side. Maybe we should use him as a sub? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I was a small, fat child in a welfare house
There was only one thing I ever dreamed about
And fate has just
Handed it to me - whoopee
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 15993
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 14:29:26 » |
|
:twisted:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3886
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 17:52:45 » |
|
Why the fuck would you pick Collingwood? He'd be a specialist fielder at Test level.
The extra bounce at The Oval would help Tremlett.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 17:54:16 » |
|
sorry that we're not all cricketing god's, boeta.
I only wish I could possibly have a mere quarter of your knowledge of cricket.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 15993
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 18:45:19 » |
|
Why the fuck would you pick Collingwood? He'd be a specialist fielder at Test level.
The extra bounce at The Oval would help Tremlett. But Tremlett is shite! Every ball bounces off his toes! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 19:00:53 » |
|
I wonder if Goughie has one last test in him? Not really looked to see how he's been going with Essex or even if he's fit, but he's the probably the best bowler of reverse swing we've got, which seems to have troubled the Aussies.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
