Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14190
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 19:52:23 » |
|
It says... ''uses Honda's 2.0 litre i-VTEC engine, reguarded as the best 4 cylinder engine in the world. Powering the Civic Type R'' 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14190
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 19:53:27 » |
|
exactly.
He isn't sure if they can get the same engines though :evil:
but apparently they have the internal shell etc and he + 1 other are designing the outer shell. from what i've seen it will be fantastic and cost approx £40k. In full Type R tune (200 bhp) that thing would eat Ferrari's.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
magicroundabout
Fanta Pants
Offline
Posts: 8786
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 19:54:20 » |
|
also supercharged to 300bhp which works out to be 600bhp per tonne.
hopefully him and his mates can get it off the ground and into production.
they are aiming at 50 cars at the moment
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14190
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 19:55:46 » |
|
also supercharged to 300bhp which works out to be 600bhp per tonne.
hopefully him and his mates can get it off the ground and into production.
they are aiming at 50 cars at the moment Thats fucking crazy Supercharged Civic Type R's do 0-60 in 5 secs and 0-100 in about 10 secs! That thing would keep with superbikes :twisted:
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
magicroundabout
Fanta Pants
Offline
Posts: 8786
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 19:58:10 » |
|
the standard atom with a supercharger does 0 - 60 in 2.5sec.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14190
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 20:03:58 » |
|
If he gets one on the road, and doesn't kill himself I would REALLY like a passenger ride mate.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
magicroundabout
Fanta Pants
Offline
Posts: 8786
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 20:07:30 » |
|
when i'm there next i'll ask if he can do me a .jpg of it so i can post it on here to show ya.
from what he was saying it really is a possibility that it will happen
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14190
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 20:08:47 » |
|
If he wants some good technical advice on the K20 A engine, text me and i'll tell you someone in the know.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
magicroundabout
Fanta Pants
Offline
Posts: 8786
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 20:14:38 » |
|
tbh mate he probably knows someone who knows that person anyway. or even the actual designers at honda
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
walrus
Offline
Posts: 4228
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 20:16:40 » |
|
I'm sorry, but you could never pull in that thing!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14190
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 20:17:44 » |
|
You can lower the 'VTEC point' where the more aggressive cam takes over by using a chip by a company called Hondata.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
magicroundabout
Fanta Pants
Offline
Posts: 8786
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 20:18:20 » |
|
would you want to??
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14190
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 20:18:43 » |
|
I'm sorry, but you could never pull in that thing! Walrus your such a gay! You don't buy a fuckin Atom to cruise in, it's for sheer thrills.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14190
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 20:20:46 » |
|
would you want to?? Lowering the VTEC point means it kicks harder lower down the rev range instead of waiting till 5800 rpm. The pay off is the fueling needs changing and the engine is totally remapped.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 20:46:54 » |
|
Jap cars are generally reliable, havent had a single problem ever with my Toyota You had that one problem, i recall... it's purple.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|