Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Ahahahaha  (Read 2784 times)
Tails

Offline Offline

Posts: 10197


Git facked




Ignore
« Reply #15 on: Saturday, December 3, 2005, 20:06:59 »

I reckon the keeper had a few hundred on Crouchy*why the fuck does it change to Yorke?* scoring first aswell.
Logged
my-velocity

« Reply #16 on: Saturday, December 3, 2005, 20:08:39 »

Quote from: "Tails"
I reckon the keeper had a few hundred on Crouchy*why the fuck does it change to Yorke?* scoring first aswell.


He probably let them in too make him feel good.
Logged
Ben Wah Balls

Offline Offline

Posts: 5972




Ignore
« Reply #17 on: Sunday, December 4, 2005, 01:26:27 »

Quote from: "stfcbeckett"
Quote from: "Tails"
I reckon the keeper had a few hundred on Crouchy*why the fuck does it change to Yorke?* scoring first aswell.


He probably let them in too make him feel good.
:roll: Did you see his second, superb finish, to all those who said Crouchy was shite, fuck you!:wink:

The first should definitely be given to him as well, as it was already on target before the goalkeeper touched it so not an own goal.
Logged
reeves4england

Online Online

Posts: 16128


We'll never die!




Ignore
« Reply #18 on: Sunday, December 4, 2005, 02:01:51 »

I have seen Hewlett score gud goals. Doesn't make him an Englad striker (thankfully)
Logged
Ben Wah Balls

Offline Offline

Posts: 5972




Ignore
« Reply #19 on: Sunday, December 4, 2005, 03:35:53 »

Hewlett did score a good goal against Notts County

No idea what that has to do with anything though, I've seen Gurney score great free kicks so why's Beckham in the England team. :?
Logged
Dazzza

Offline Offline

Posts: 8265



WWW
« Reply #20 on: Sunday, December 4, 2005, 03:40:49 »

Ben I'd kiss your head if it was within range.

It was punt of the day today but I’d nailed him on getting his opener in the Champions league the other week and didn't get a chance to hit the bookies today.

Fair play but he’s no Stan Collywobble
Logged

DV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 33904


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #21 on: Sunday, December 4, 2005, 12:12:32 »

Quote from: "Ben Wah Balls"
Quote from: "stfcbeckett"
Quote from: "Tails"
I reckon the keeper had a few hundred on Crouchy*why the fuck does it change to Yorke?* scoring first aswell.


He probably let them in too make him feel good.
:roll: Did you see his second, superb finish, to all those who said Crouchy was shite, fuck you!:wink:

The first should definitely be given to him as well, as it was already on target before the goalkeeper touched it so not an own goal.


But the first wasnt on target before it hit Baines, therer is no way he can claim it, sorry.

If it hadnt of hit the defender it would not have gone in....
Logged
Spud

« Reply #22 on: Sunday, December 4, 2005, 12:39:48 »

Sorry but theres no way the first was his, Pollitt punched the fucker into his own net plus it took a HUGE deflection.
Logged
Ben Wah Balls

Offline Offline

Posts: 5972




Ignore
« Reply #23 on: Sunday, December 4, 2005, 16:43:06 »

Quote from: "DV85"
Quote from: "Ben Wah Balls"
Quote from: "stfcbeckett"
Quote from: "Tails"
I reckon the keeper had a few hundred on Crouchy*why the fuck does it change to Yorke?* scoring first aswell.


He probably let them in too make him feel good.
:roll: Did you see his second, superb finish, to all those who said Crouchy was shite, fuck you!:wink:

The first should definitely be given to him as well, as it was already on target before the goalkeeper touched it so not an own goal.


But the first wasnt on target before it hit Baines, therer is no way he can claim it, sorry.

If it hadnt of hit the defender it would not have gone in....


It was always on target, of course he can claim it. I agree with Hansen and Lineker, there's no way you can give that as an own goal.
Logged
Spud

« Reply #24 on: Sunday, December 4, 2005, 16:44:16 »

What when the keeper clearly should have caught it but ended up punching it in the net?. :|
Logged
DV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 33904


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #25 on: Sunday, December 4, 2005, 16:48:53 »

Quote from: "Ben Wah Balls"
Quote from: "DV85"
Quote from: "Ben Wah Balls"
Quote from: "stfcbeckett"
Quote from: "Tails"
I reckon the keeper had a few hundred on Crouchy*why the fuck does it change to Yorke?* scoring first aswell.


He probably let them in too make him feel good.
:roll: Did you see his second, superb finish, to all those who said Crouchy was shite, fuck you!:wink:

The first should definitely be given to him as well, as it was already on target before the goalkeeper touched it so not an own goal.


But the first wasnt on target before it hit Baines, therer is no way he can claim it, sorry.

If it hadnt of hit the defender it would not have gone in....


It was always on target, of course he can claim it. I agree with Hansen and Lineker, there's no way you can give that as an own goal.


The orginal shot was going wide before it hit Baines, it was the deflection that beat the keeper, not the orginal shot.....
Logged
Ben Wah Balls

Offline Offline

Posts: 5972




Ignore
« Reply #26 on: Sunday, December 4, 2005, 16:53:09 »

Quote from: "Spuddy_STFC"
What when the keeper clearly should have caught it but ended up punching it in the net?. :|
That is never given as an own goal. If you were going to give those as own goals you'd have to give any shot that was on target with the keeper trying but failing to tip around the post or over as own goals but they are not. Goals are not given as own goals just because the keeper got a touch and it was a difficult shot to save.
Logged
Ben Wah Balls

Offline Offline

Posts: 5972




Ignore
« Reply #27 on: Sunday, December 4, 2005, 17:32:31 »

Quote from: "DV85"
Quote from: "Ben Wah Balls"
Quote from: "DV85"
Quote from: "Ben Wah Balls"
Quote from: "stfcbeckett"
Quote from: "Tails"
I reckon the keeper had a few hundred on Crouchy*why the fuck does it change to Yorke?* scoring first aswell.


He probably let them in too make him feel good.
:roll: Did you see his second, superb finish, to all those who said Crouchy was shite, fuck you!:wink:

The first should definitely be given to him as well, as it was already on target before the goalkeeper touched it so not an own goal.


But the first wasnt on target before it hit Baines, therer is no way he can claim it, sorry.

If it hadnt of hit the defender it would not have gone in....


It was always on target, of course he can claim it. I agree with Hansen and Lineker, there's no way you can give that as an own goal.


The orginal shot was going wide before it hit Baines, it was the deflection that beat the keeper, not the orginal shot.....


It wasn't though, I've watched it in slow motion and it was on target, the deflection just takes it upwards, if it hadn't hit the defender it would probably have gone in anyway and would definitely have been on target. Should be Crouchy's goal without doubt.

An own goal should be for when a shot or pass that's going well wide is knocked in by mistake at the last minute, or a dodgy back pass or when a defender tries to make a clearance and puts the ball in his own net.

It should definitely not be an own goal when a player runs half the length of the pitch, has the courage to shoot from outside the penalty area and hits a great shot which despite taking a deflection still goes in and would've been on target without the deflection.
Logged
STFC Village

« Reply #28 on: Sunday, December 4, 2005, 18:01:00 »

Does it matter? He's still shit! :grin:
Logged
Spud

« Reply #29 on: Sunday, December 4, 2005, 18:06:19 »

Quote from: "STFC Village"
Does it matter? He's still shit! :grin:


Exactly!  Cool
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: