Audrey
 Offline
Posts: 19750
?Absolute Calamity!?
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Wednesday, May 15, 2024, 06:43:17 » |
|
Plus Charlie’s slightly cryptic Twitter post and FBT taking a swipe, it’s making it difficult for Clem’s silence to continue.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Audrey
Offline
Posts: 19750
?Absolute Calamity!?
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Wednesday, May 15, 2024, 06:48:49 » |
|
What’s this master plan then?
Battle lines drawn.
Sink the club. Demolish the CG. Redevelop. Make money. Disappear. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nemo
Shit Bacon
Offline
Posts: 22113
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Wednesday, May 15, 2024, 06:52:41 » |
|
It's notable - and probably wise - that the Trust letter sticks to the easily provable, explainable stuff. We all know there's more there but the focus makes it harder to wriggle out of.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: Wednesday, May 15, 2024, 07:57:39 by Nemo »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JoeMezz
Offline
Posts: 2732
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Wednesday, May 15, 2024, 06:54:34 » |
|
Also worthwhile saying how complicit the last lot were. Actual disgrace how long they let the club get away with all of this. Well done the new board but fuck off the old lot
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
UTR
Offline
Posts: 867
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Wednesday, May 15, 2024, 06:59:24 » |
|
Huge credit to the new Trust board, read the room with the survey and now an excellent statement as it looks like they’re going on the offensive for our club like we’ve all wanted.
Interesting times indeed. Let’s see what response this draws.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lemis
Offline
Posts: 343
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Wednesday, May 15, 2024, 07:15:16 » |
|
Glad to see the trust standing tall after tolerating more and more shit coming out of the clubs ownership over Clem's tenure. As others have already hopefully might wake the remaining sleepy few who accept how bad things have got as normal.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Have you seen the writing on the wall?
|
|
|
Bob1978
Offline
Posts: 415
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Wednesday, May 15, 2024, 07:20:27 » |
|
Credit to the Trust - Head firmly out the ground. None of this should come as any suprise to Clem
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Legends-Lounge
Offline
Posts: 8531
Non PC straight talking tory Brexit voter on this
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Wednesday, May 15, 2024, 07:51:33 » |
|
Sink the club. Demolish the CG. Redevelop. Make money. Disappear.
Is that a fact or conjecture? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
theakston2k
Offline
Posts: 5538
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Wednesday, May 15, 2024, 08:01:25 » |
|
Gifting Morfuni and the crooks 50% of the ground is going to prove to be a monumental mistake isn’t it?!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Audrey
Offline
Posts: 19750
?Absolute Calamity!?
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Wednesday, May 15, 2024, 08:07:32 » |
|
Gifting Morfuni and the crooks 50% of the ground is going to prove to be a monumental mistake isn’t it?!
Take the ground out of the equation and Morfuni et al would be gone by now. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
singingiiiffy
Offline
Posts: 2860
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Wednesday, May 15, 2024, 08:10:44 » |
|
Yes! Here we go. This is going to get messy but it always was to remove an owner. Genuinely woke up so happy to read this statement.
One step closer. He can't win the fans back, and when you have that you can't have the club. The clem clock is ticking
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Frigby Daser
Offline
Posts: 3947
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Wednesday, May 15, 2024, 08:14:46 » |
|
Gifting Morfuni and the crooks 50% of the ground is going to prove to be a monumental mistake isn’t it?!
A bit of balance is needed here. Whilst I don’t agree with the passivity of the previous Trust board members, there were well meaning people there with good intentions. I have no ill feeling towards them - they were duped, as we all were, by Morfuni and co and it is difficult to extract yourself from that. I exclude the Fair Game bloke from this - that was deceptive. A change in board was needed in order to take this approach and have credibility. Today is the first day of trying to wrestle back control, hound them out, protest, apply pressure etc. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nemo
Shit Bacon
Offline
Posts: 22113
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Wednesday, May 15, 2024, 08:16:36 » |
|
There are also some fairly sensible legal restrictions in place - that 50% cannot be transferred away form the club ownership into a separate company, for example - so we supposedly can't get to a Kassam-at-Oxford style situation.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sippo
Living in the 80s
Offline
Posts: 15600
I ain't gettin on no plane fool
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Wednesday, May 15, 2024, 08:19:31 » |
|
The cunt doesn't have to do anything. He'll just put two fingers upto it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
|
|
|
Audrey
Offline
Posts: 19750
?Absolute Calamity!?
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Wednesday, May 15, 2024, 08:23:21 » |
|
Yes! Here we go. This is going to get messy but it always was to remove an owner. Genuinely woke up so happy to read this statement.
One step closer. He can't win the fans back, and when you have that you can't have the club. The clem clock is ticking
How long did it take for Blackpool to get rid of a convicted rapist as owner |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
