Questions for the Advisory Board

[TheSpiritof69]

As very much NOT In the Know and a supporter of both SO69 and a member of the Trust, is anyone able to explain to me  - and presumably other Townend posters and lurkers - what this apparent clashing between the 2 entities is about?

I had understood that they were distinct entities with distinct objectives.

Absolute no "clash" whatsoever.

We're very grateful for the support the Trust have given us so far and are broadly aligned on our single issue. We have no purpose beyond ending Clem Morfuni's ownership of STFC; The trust has huge purpose to their members and the STFC community and that purpose has existed and will continue to exist in a Morfuni-free STFC.

This means we can be very binary in our approach, and the trust need to be more nuanced. We respect that totally, while as individuals, may disagree with the intricacies of some of those interactions.

[Formerly Drummer Boy]

This means we can be very binary in our approach, and the trust need to be more nuanced. We respect that totally, while as individuals, may disagree with the intricacies of some of those interactions.

If the SO69 entity has a single purpose, it should only have an opinion on that one subject. How the Trust, OSC or any other fan organisation or individuals fans behave towards that single purpose, it shouldn’t be of concern to the SO69 if it’s to maintain its good start.

I would suggest if you want to maintain a respectful visibility between Trust and SO69, if you have any pointed questions, discuss them directly and offline. It’s critical that where SO69 has allies, there shouldn’t be any air between what is visible.

The SO69 entity can not turn into another STFC Questions account under a different name… That won’t help the cause to unite fans in the slightest!

IMO of course. Pinch of salt SO69 guys, take or leave the feedback. It’s a stage you guys have built so use it how you see fit until no one is following anymore.

[RedRag]

Thanks for the replies to my question above about potential differences between SO69 and the Trust.  I understand the differences but, as a supporter of the first and a member of the 2nd, I am re-assured that there is no "clash" as such.  The Single Issue SO69 is clear and it is for Trust members supporting that Single Issue to feed their view into the Trust so that it may be properly represented.

[molepar]

I might have imagined it but I thought the club said that the fan zone would be open in November? I seemed to think that by “open” they were talking about an area with food and drink outlets as well as entertainment. Instead we have a statue with a crumbling base in a patch of muddy gravel with a fence around it. Has the club given up on the fan zone idea?

[Batch]

I might have imagined it but I thought the club said that the fan zone would be open in November? I seemed to think that by “open” they were talking about an area with food and drink outlets as well as entertainment. Instead we have a statue with a crumbling base in a patch of muddy gravel with a fence around it. Has the club given up on the fan zone idea?

This came up with someone yesterday. I realised then I have no idea what, if anything, the next stage was.

[TheSpiritof69]

There have been times when we have derided the AB, but as per the last Q&A entries (which aren't part of the AB meeting, FYI) they can be a useful route to snookering #STFC on lies, mistruths and incompetence.

As part of our renewed and ongoing alignment with the Trust we'd wholly encourage fans to bombard the Trust with cutting, pointed questions. "Yes/No" style questions are perhaps preferred, in terms of trying to get absolute answers.

Email them to the Trust (info@truststfc.com, the subject line "AB Question") and also tag us on socials with them too please.

[4D]

Why have the statutory accounts been minimised? Particularly when transparency was one of the buzz words from the start of their tenure.

[RobertT]

Why have the details on where the long term been removed?  Do the club realise that their accounts are now less detailed than the last set produced by Lee Power?  How is the long term debt structured - who is it owed to (actual entities, even if fully owned by Clem Morfuni), how much, and on what terms?  Did Revenue decrease in the last financial year?

[tans]

https://x.com/so69fangroup/status/1895100421460688991?s=46&t=sUQ-fFgelrF5oqTmo-D8tA

[Batch]

https://x.com/so69fangroup/status/1895100421460688991?s=46&t=sUQ-fFgelrF5oqTmo-D8tA

Interesting.....

[Ƭ̵̬̊: The Artist Formerly Known as CWIG]

The wives want out? That is a start.

[Batch]

Why have the details on where the long term been removed?  Do the club realise that their accounts are now less detailed than the last set produced by Lee Power?  How is the long term debt structured - who is it owed to (actual entities, even if fully owned by Clem Morfuni), how much, and on what terms?  Did Revenue decrease in the last financial year?

If its not there, you can't question it.

Massively stupid logic as it raises more questions, but I bet that's it.

[Batch]

The wives want out? That is a start.

meeting prospective buyers

For just their minority shareholding or for the entire club including their shareholding? Its not clear.

[Power to people]

Hmm, clearly a consultant able to consult on a number of matters including prospective sales of football clubs

Clearly a question for the Advisory board, I'm sure there is an honest explanation as it is not something they know would know about or have authorised

[Ƭ̵̬̊: The Artist Formerly Known as CWIG]

Well remember he went from being "*pause*........he gives us good data" to owning a 5th of the club.