Eh? How do you work that out? Entirely centred around Flitcroft freezing him out surely? You can argue it's justified by Vigs' behaviour, but it was Flitcroft's decision, it is completely about him. Unless you're suggesting Power took the decision (and ordered Flitcroft to repeatedly hang him out to dry in public to set the scene)?
Power and Flitcroft obviously don't rate Vigs otherwise he wouldn't have been drummed out of the club on loan....................................oh, wait a minute, does Power have a connection with Waterford? If so you'd wonder how Vigs' wages are being met as between the two clubs.
This isn't anti Power but there is a massive conflict of interest when club ownership is shared - as with Maxwell or, more succesfully tbf, Watford I believe.