Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Formation/Team for tomorrow.  (Read 4120 times)
DV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 33875


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« on: Friday, September 2, 2005, 11:20:17 »

Who would you play and in what formation.

I certainly wouldnt go 4-5-1 FACT! Too negative, not enough chances and we are going to steal a 1-0 win.

4-4-2

Heaton

Gurney
Collins
Ifil
Smith

Heath
Pook
Miglioranzi
Whalley

Roberts
Fallon


Christian Roberts (bar wycombe) has looked rather good and dangerous, he has to start as he just adds that something else. Something we have clearly been lacking away from home recently....last 7 without an away goal is it?
Logged
Piemonte

« Reply #1 on: Friday, September 2, 2005, 11:21:59 »

theres not much natural width to that midfield VD..........

I'd play shakes for his pace on the counter attack
Logged
Kinky Tom
Snow Master Sandwich King.

Offline Offline

Posts: 9043





Ignore
« Reply #2 on: Friday, September 2, 2005, 11:22:28 »

No Shakes?
Logged
adje

Offline Offline

Posts: 14806





Ignore
« Reply #3 on: Friday, September 2, 2005, 11:23:55 »

Hi Kinky-my ears are still ringing!Agreed Shakes must play!
Logged

quot;Molten memories splashing down
 upon the rooves of Swindon Town"
DV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 33875


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #4 on: Friday, September 2, 2005, 11:24:02 »

Quote from: "Piemonte"
theres not much natural width to that midfield VD..........

I'd play shakes for his pace on the counter attack


I wouldnt play Shakes due to his inability to keep the ball on the pitch

Heath did well down the left against Tranmere, his crossing wasnt good because he always went outside onto his left footed, which isnt his strongest.

Whalley wont add much width at all, but he can at least produce some quality deliveries hopefully.

I've yet to see a decent cross all season, no good having all these good strikers with no decent service, that is the reason we should have fought harder to keeper Summerbee
Logged
McLovin

« Reply #5 on: Friday, September 2, 2005, 11:24:22 »

I'd play the exact same team, only i'd play Shakes instead of Migz; on the wing obviously.

I'd also start with Thorpe.  Cureton's done nowt.  Now let the whinging fucker have a go alongside Fallon, then if he cocks it up, banish him to the reserves until next transfer window.
Logged
DV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 33875


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #6 on: Friday, September 2, 2005, 11:25:59 »

Shakes was awful against Tranmere, Ben Wells got in more crosses in 5minutes than Shakes has all season. No end product, our strikers need feeding!
Logged
le god cuervo

Offline Offline

Posts: 1168





Ignore
« Reply #7 on: Friday, September 2, 2005, 11:52:16 »

shakes is better off the bench.

i would play (442):

--------------heaton----------------

gurney--collins-----ifil-------smith

heath--pook--miglioranzi--nicolau

--------roberts----fallon-------------

bench: bulman, jenkins, whalley, shakes, thorpe/cureton

if king sticks with 4-5-1 he is a prick
Logged
Sippo
Living in the 80s

Offline Offline

Posts: 15614


I ain't gettin on no plane fool




Ignore
« Reply #8 on: Friday, September 2, 2005, 11:52:20 »

It wouldn't surprise me if King plays 4-5-1 again   :evil:
Logged

If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
McLovin

« Reply #9 on: Friday, September 2, 2005, 11:56:00 »

King: "oooh, we did look hard to beat though..."
King's Mum: "you still lost though"
King: "oh yeah..."
Logged
sonicyouth

Offline Offline

Posts: 22352





Ignore
« Reply #10 on: Friday, September 2, 2005, 12:18:18 »

Nicholas and Jenkins are both fit again, so that gives us another option.

I'd play:

Code:

             Heaton
Gurney   Collins   Ifil   Smith
Shakes   Migs      Pook   Nicolau
         Fallon    Heath


subs:
Bulman
Jenkins
McDermott
Whalley
Roberts

It's tough choosing the central midfielders! I'd never have thought I'd be saying that. Heath impressed me against Tranmere but I think he's simply not got the crossing ability to play out wide, so I'd try him up front (his natural position) and see what happens. Difficult to drop Gurney for Jenkins but they both lack match fitness anyway.

I hate to think what King will play...
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #11 on: Friday, September 2, 2005, 12:29:42 »

King will stick with the 4-5-1.....

   As  far a he's concerned Tranmere was a decent show....

   Walsall seem to be an attacking outfit.....but likely to concede even to our shot shy shower.....
Logged
sonicyouth

Offline Offline

Posts: 22352





Ignore
« Reply #12 on: Friday, September 2, 2005, 12:31:03 »

It was a decent show, we just lacked the punch up front.
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #13 on: Friday, September 2, 2005, 12:32:49 »

Quote from: "sonicyouth"
It was a decent show, we just lacked the punch up front.


 That's why he'll stick with it, and hope Walsall's ineptitude at the back will let us sneak a goal somehow.
Logged
unclemark

Offline Offline

Posts: 690




Ignore
« Reply #14 on: Friday, September 2, 2005, 12:34:29 »

I think we shoud play an attacking 4-4-2 and get that first away goal of the season.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
Print
Jump to: