BambooToTheFuture
Offline
Posts: 10167
I'll Tell Ya Now - McGurk Is The New Graham
|
|
« Reply #13080 on: Wednesday, February 14, 2024, 22:42:35 » |
|
Harris has about as much chance as I have of winning, if she stood, and I'm not eligible.
Thanks for the USA election process info - so finances allowing, it's relatively free reign. I apologise regarding Harris. I've been largely ignorant to most of what has been going on since she has been in office. And of what I have seen from time to time usually just focuses on Biden or the baffling {to me} reemergence of Trump. Which lead me then to me questioning, why then would Harris not even get close to winning? Has she really been that bad? By default she takes over if Biden is unwell/dies/can no longer serve etc. So is she really a poor/awful politician? I can't say I've seen {in what is limited, either by my own lack of viewing or not as much coverage} much bad press about her. Alternatively, is it in part because she's both a female and person of colour which holds her back in the still much white privileged and male dominated free world?
|
|
|
Logged
|
'Incessant Nonsense' ______________________________________________________________
'I'm gonna tell you the secret. There's a threat, you end it and you don't feel ashamed about enjoying it. You smell the gunpowder and you see the blood, you know what that means? It means you're alive. You've won. You take the heads so that you don't ever forget.'
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 11794
|
|
« Reply #13081 on: Wednesday, February 14, 2024, 22:55:40 » |
|
She has essentially managed to be a non-entity, enabling the Republicans to call her what they wish and for Democrats to largely forget about her. What she has done in public has, mostly, been a bit error prone. I think she did well in the previous election Primaries because she debated well and wouldn't back down, but she does not strike me as a good politician. Right now, the Democrats are letting Biden go because nobody else fancies the career ending prospect of losing to Trump. They will keep their powder dry and go for it in 4 years time. If the current trend remains, then it will Gavin Newsome who takes the front runners seat I think. Four years is a long time, but no idea who the Republicans go for then. Most of this years crop showed themselves to be pretty limp.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Qunk
Offline
Posts: 868
|
|
« Reply #13082 on: Thursday, February 15, 2024, 07:12:44 » |
|
UK entered recession at the end of 2023. I wonder if this’ll bring forward our GE?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey
Offline
Posts: 19481
?Absolute Calamity!?
|
|
« Reply #13083 on: Sunday, February 18, 2024, 09:53:56 » |
|
I was listening to some new Minister for Illegal Immigration still banging on about Rwanda.
Just how do they think a couple of hundred illegal migrants are going to happily board a plane to dump them in Rwanda?
If there is to be site outside of the UK to process claims surely it should be in France.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bennett
No Comment
Offline
Posts: 9523
|
|
« Reply #13084 on: Sunday, February 18, 2024, 10:42:41 » |
|
Gotta have a willing partner and an incentive to have a "processing centre". You'd hope Rwanda didn't just got a VIP lane to be our processing partner and alternatives were looked at (the UK wouldn't have been too bad an option imo, it also supports create jobs)
You do also need to have a legal process that doesn't involve being thought up by Schrödinger, to claim asylum.
|
|
|
Logged
|
This is the water. And this is the well. Drink full and descend. The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
|
|
|
|
adje
Offline
Posts: 13699
|
|
« Reply #13086 on: Tuesday, February 20, 2024, 19:21:43 » |
|
Australia "saving the world"🤔
|
|
|
Logged
|
quot;Molten memories splashing down upon the rooves of Swindon Town"
|
|
|
Jimmy HaveHave
Offline
Posts: 15358
|
|
« Reply #13087 on: Tuesday, February 20, 2024, 19:25:24 » |
|
Arthur Sargill wouldn’t be happy
|
|
|
Logged
|
Clem, hurry up and sell up🤡
|
|
|
The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey
Offline
Posts: 19481
?Absolute Calamity!?
|
|
« Reply #13088 on: Tuesday, February 20, 2024, 19:41:33 » |
|
Talking of Scargill, who saw that fantastic documentary about the miner’s strike the other evening. What a bunch of bastards those coppers were.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Posh Red
Posh by name, Posh by nature
Offline
Posts: 7363
|
|
« Reply #13089 on: Tuesday, February 20, 2024, 19:45:36 » |
|
Talking of Scargill, who saw that fantastic documentary about the miner’s strike the other evening. What a bunch of bastards those coppers were.
If you went to Mansfield you wouldn’t need a documentary to tell you that
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jimmy HaveHave
Offline
Posts: 15358
|
|
« Reply #13090 on: Tuesday, February 20, 2024, 19:46:17 » |
|
If you went to Mansfield you wouldn’t need a documentary to tell you that
1986
|
|
|
Logged
|
Clem, hurry up and sell up🤡
|
|
|
adje
Offline
Posts: 13699
|
|
« Reply #13091 on: Tuesday, February 20, 2024, 19:50:28 » |
|
Talking of Scargill, who saw that fantastic documentary about the miner’s strike the other evening. What a bunch of bastards those coppers were.
Yeah,I saw it. Still outraged by that
|
|
|
Logged
|
quot;Molten memories splashing down upon the rooves of Swindon Town"
|
|
|
The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey
Offline
Posts: 19481
?Absolute Calamity!?
|
|
« Reply #13092 on: Tuesday, February 20, 2024, 19:52:04 » |
|
If you went to Mansfield you wouldn’t need a documentary to tell you that
I was there. Think they were practising on us - or just venting their anger.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55557
|
|
« Reply #13093 on: Tuesday, February 20, 2024, 20:08:45 » |
|
Talking of Scargill, who saw that fantastic documentary about the miner’s strike the other evening. What a bunch of bastards those coppers were. I saw a three part one and they didn't come across great in that either.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
4D
Or not 4D that is the question
Offline
Posts: 22066
I can't bear it 🙄
|
|
« Reply #13094 on: Friday, February 23, 2024, 14:54:11 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|