chalkies_shorts
|
 |
« Reply #60 on: Tuesday, December 31, 2013, 20:43:28 » |
|
Going back a bit, but do you remember Colt 45?
If my memory serves me right that was the first of the foreign beers sold in pubs - cans in The Bell, followed by Holsten and then Fosters. Colt 45 was absolute shite.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheDukeOfBanbury
Offline
Posts: 4186
|
 |
« Reply #61 on: Tuesday, December 31, 2013, 21:59:07 » |
|
To mention Nile Ranger in the same breath as Parkin, Cox or Austin is an insult to 3 players who all had good "spells" with us. Only Parkin though holds legendary status for 3 seasons of magic. If only we had him now in his prime as he would be scoring for fun.
I am lucky and proud to have his signed shirt and a signed bottle of champaign given to my lad "Sam" when he was born. Had a beer with him one night and what a terrific bloke he was. Sad that injuries plagued his career at Ipswich particularly that he almost went injury free at Swindon.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Empathy Sloth
|
 |
« Reply #62 on: Wednesday, January 1, 2014, 05:19:41 » |
|
Ranger is better than all 3 but you're all blinded by hatred.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57826
|
 |
« Reply #63 on: Wednesday, January 1, 2014, 09:01:22 » |
|
Ranger is better than all 3 but you're all blinded by hatred.
Like fuck! I genuinely don't see how he's anywhere near those three. And if I had the choice of any of them, or even an on form Mooney I'd pick them all over Ranger footballing wise. Ranger has something. He's a good player when he can be arsed. We don't have anyone as strong or that can play his position up front. But I just don't get the jizzfest over him. Think its going to be very difficult to replace him in the January window though.
|
|
« Last Edit: Wednesday, January 1, 2014, 09:05:28 by Batch »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
 |
« Reply #64 on: Wednesday, January 1, 2014, 09:54:15 » |
|
Ranger is better than all 3 but you're all blinded by hatred.
You are an absolute clown
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Shaw Rosso
Offline
Posts: 1774
|
 |
« Reply #65 on: Wednesday, January 1, 2014, 10:00:00 » |
|
Ranger is better than all 3 but you're all blinded by hatred.
 Best post of 2014 so far.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33906
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #66 on: Wednesday, January 1, 2014, 10:12:11 » |
|
Ranger is better than all 3 but you're all blinded by hatred.
Ranger isn't even on par with the likes of Billy Paynter and Barry Corr...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16467
|
 |
« Reply #67 on: Wednesday, January 1, 2014, 11:17:52 » |
|
Ranger is the best target man we've had since I've been watching town. But to compare him with the likes of cox and Austin is like comparing apples with oranges. Completely different types of players
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
Benzel
Offline
Posts: 6158
|
 |
« Reply #68 on: Wednesday, January 1, 2014, 11:18:08 » |
|
On the pitch he's amazing, that's all I'm bothered about. Personally I think he's better than Austin and Cox, he doesn't get as many goals but he is the complete forward.
Absolutely right.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Is your cat making too much noise all the time?
|
|
|
Benzel
Offline
Posts: 6158
|
 |
« Reply #69 on: Wednesday, January 1, 2014, 11:19:46 » |
|
Ranger isn't even on par with the likes of Billy Paynter and Barry Corr...
Stop it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Is your cat making too much noise all the time?
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33906
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #70 on: Wednesday, January 1, 2014, 11:24:40 » |
|
Stop it.
Nope. Rangers 6 goals will be fondly remembered... Even more than him being a cunt, not.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Honkytonk
Offline
Posts: 4476
Whoo Whoo!
|
 |
« Reply #71 on: Wednesday, January 1, 2014, 11:59:03 » |
|
Cock off Ranger's as good as Austin or Parkin. No fecking way.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33906
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #72 on: Wednesday, January 1, 2014, 12:07:11 » |
|
Cock off Ranger's as good as Austin or Parkin. No fecking way.
We're talking football here, not cock size...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RedRag
Offline
Posts: 3501
|
 |
« Reply #73 on: Wednesday, January 1, 2014, 12:11:54 » |
|
Ranger is the best target man we've had since I've been watching town. But to compare him with the likes of cox and Austin is like comparing apples with oranges. Completely different types of players
This is the point for me though having said that, of course, Parkin, Austin and Cox were more special as strikers. For me, STFCs play as a whole has been significantly more convincing with Ranger starting. Would be interested to know whether or not this observation, already made by many, is borne out by results
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Honkytonk
Offline
Posts: 4476
Whoo Whoo!
|
 |
« Reply #74 on: Wednesday, January 1, 2014, 12:13:44 » |
|
We're talking football here, not cock size...
Still reckon Parkin's was bigger.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|