|
STFC Village
|
 |
« Reply #60 on: Thursday, August 11, 2005, 16:25:20 » |
|
Bell's a midget. A magic midget  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #61 on: Thursday, August 11, 2005, 16:40:13 » |
|
Did anyone just see that little kid give an Aussie player the 'V's'?.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
STFC Village
|
|
« Reply #62 on: Thursday, August 11, 2005, 16:41:00 » |
|
Did anyone just see that little kid give an Aussie player the 'V's'?. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
STFC Village
|
|
« Reply #63 on: Thursday, August 11, 2005, 16:42:58 » |
|
Pieterson gone  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #64 on: Thursday, August 11, 2005, 16:44:58 » |
|
I fucking hate the whole Night watchman idea.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
STFC Village
|
|
« Reply #65 on: Thursday, August 11, 2005, 16:59:58 » |
|
I fucking hate the whole Night watchman idea. In typical fashion, Hoggy out last ball of the day :roll: Still, a good day all round, would have taken that scoreline at the start of the day, Fred still to come. My £5 looking safe  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #66 on: Thursday, August 11, 2005, 17:03:45 » |
|
I fucking hate the whole Night watchman idea. In typical fashion, Hoggy out last ball of the day :roll: No further questions your honour. :| |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
oxford_fan
 Offline
Posts: 6764
|
|
« Reply #67 on: Thursday, August 11, 2005, 17:31:36 » |
|
i watched some of this cricket lark today, it was surprisingly interesting.
i'll be tuning in tomorrow to see super freddy bash them all over the park.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 14538
|
|
« Reply #68 on: Thursday, August 11, 2005, 21:50:59 » |
|
I fucking hate the whole Night watchman idea. Totally. You are saying "Oooh, come in and play a few forward defensives and just stay in" or whatever the jargon is. But by definition, tail enders (and that is who you are asking this of) cannot do this. That is why they are tail enders. It is fucked up. It is not rocket science. We are not splitting the atom. It is fucked up. It is a dumb, stupid idea. Just as dumb as a short corner for example. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #69 on: Thursday, August 11, 2005, 22:16:43 » |
|
not such a bad days play me thinks! shame about pietersen and hoggard going at the end, but oh well. vaughan showed that he can hit a ball! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
blinkpip
His Infernal Majesty
Offline
Posts: 6742
|
|
« Reply #70 on: Friday, August 12, 2005, 10:37:07 » |
|
Rain. :x
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ee the trick is only pick on those that can't do you no harm
Like the drummer from Def Leppard's only got one arm
I annoyed Yeovilred 28/01/06
|
|
|
|
Nils
|
|
« Reply #71 on: Friday, August 12, 2005, 10:52:35 » |
|
I fucking hate the whole Night watchman idea. Totally. You are saying "Oooh, come in and play a few forward defensives and just stay in" or whatever the jargon is. But by definition, tail enders (and that is who you are asking this of) cannot do this. That is why they are tail enders. It is fucked up. It is not rocket science. We are not splitting the atom. It is fucked up. It is a dumb, stupid idea. Just as dumb as a short corner for example. Obviously an opinion of an ignorant cricketer. If you knew and watched lots of England cricket you would know that Hoggard is a very good defensive batsmen. Hoggard can hang around for a good couple of hours. The ball that got him out was awesome and was good enough to get the Laras and Tendulkars out. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #72 on: Friday, August 12, 2005, 11:35:34 » |
|
i think a nightwatchmen is very important if there are 10 overs or so left in the days play, because then if hoggard can see out as much as possible, it'll let flintoof, jones or who ever is in next the chance to bat the next day fresh and not stupidly lose his wicket at the end of the days play and put england in a bad situation.
todays play hasn't been too bad, but can't believe jesus (gillespie) has got jones out, he was looking crap, was a good ball though.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #73 on: Friday, August 12, 2005, 13:46:23 » |
|
Langer gone, great catch by Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #74 on: Friday, August 12, 2005, 15:22:50 » |
|
Aussie's are 115-4, Gilchrist's in and Clarke's still not fit |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
