Legends-Lounge
 Offline
Posts: 8241
Non PC straight talking tory Brexit voter on this
|
 |
« Reply #3855 on: Tuesday, November 16, 2021, 19:02:41 » |
|
But they were all originally Mates and fell out.
Just goes to show the duplicitous nature of a certain Pee Lower. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: Tuesday, November 16, 2021, 19:13:55 by Legends-Lounge »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheDukeOfBanbury
Offline
Posts: 4001
|
|
« Reply #3856 on: Tuesday, November 16, 2021, 19:03:29 » |
|
Knock them all down like dominoes😀
Not ruling out custodial sentences with this. Only knows what the judge(s) dish out but if everything gets exposed going to be some revelations. Only positive right now is no bad news, bills being paid and reputation stock has risen. Negatives “we” have broken rules and whether a decent lawyer can deflect the wrong-doings to a previous owner and associates. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheDukeOfBanbury
Offline
Posts: 4001
|
|
« Reply #3857 on: Tuesday, November 16, 2021, 19:04:16 » |
|
Just goes to show w the duplicitous nature of a certain Pee Lower.
Plenty others not squeaky clean and funding will come under scrutiny. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey
Offline
Posts: 19365
?Absolute Calamity!?
|
|
« Reply #3858 on: Tuesday, November 16, 2021, 19:17:19 » |
|
This is only an EFL hearing, not a legal one. Not even the EFL can send anyone down
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Legends-Lounge
Offline
Posts: 8241
Non PC straight talking tory Brexit voter on this
|
|
« Reply #3859 on: Tuesday, November 16, 2021, 19:28:43 » |
|
This is only an EFL hearing, not a legal one. Not even the EFL can send anyone down
I think the implications of the ‘football’ hearings evidence could result in legal proceedings being undertaken. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
 Online
Posts: 55363
|
|
« Reply #3860 on: Tuesday, November 16, 2021, 19:43:17 » |
|
Existing proceedings. This now includes Gareth Barry. As I see it it’s not additional charges for us. Just an inclusion of GB.
Yup, though I didn't know or forgot the 1st December response deadline. Unhappy Christmas? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
Offline
Posts: 12519
|
|
« Reply #3861 on: Tuesday, November 16, 2021, 20:40:34 » |
|
Well it can hardly be argued that we got an unfair advantage out of it. We've fucking awful for ages.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
4D
Or not 4D that is the question
Offline
Posts: 21902
I can't bear it 🙄
|
|
« Reply #3862 on: Tuesday, November 16, 2021, 20:51:18 » |
|
Exactly, apart from one promotion season we went backwards under the previous ownership.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Quagmire
Offline
Posts: 4618
|
|
« Reply #3863 on: Tuesday, November 16, 2021, 21:09:07 » |
|
Plenty others not squeaky clean and funding will come under scrutiny.
As in those currently in charge now? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Outletred
Online
Posts: 660
|
|
« Reply #3864 on: Tuesday, November 16, 2021, 21:43:04 » |
|
I would have thought the club would have a strong case against any sanctions imposed by the EFL
1) This happened in 2013
But more importantly:
2) The EFL passed Power as “fit and proper” back in 2013- therefore it is their process that is floored.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Shrivvy Road
|
|
« Reply #3865 on: Tuesday, November 16, 2021, 22:08:55 » |
|
As in those currently in charge now?
Nah won't be any of the current lot |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Robinz
Offline
Posts: 809
|
|
« Reply #3866 on: Wednesday, November 17, 2021, 04:22:14 » |
|
Outletred...
Suggest that your comments are correct and very real.
The FA /FL gave the go ahead for dodgy Pee Lower to take over the club as a fit and proper person.
Based on the information given to them they obviously approved his right to take over STFC. The charges seem to relate to parties from the time Pee Lower took over the club then.
Therefore, the charges that are currently in place against STFC must to directed to the then Directors and just possibly the shareholders namely Pee Lower who was the sole director and sole shareholder.
Clem Morfuni could be considered to be involved by the matter of association and investing 1.1million dollars however this was previously stated to be for sponsorship and advertising on the club shirt.
Although this was later disputed !!!
End of the day. Lets just keep our fingers crossed and a good win at Newport on Saturday will be great. COYMRs
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey
Offline
Posts: 19365
?Absolute Calamity!?
|
|
« Reply #3867 on: Wednesday, November 17, 2021, 05:13:40 » |
|
What may or may not be relevant here is that apart from the club all others charged by the FA are no longer involved in the game and if any paperwork that the FA may require which could lead to criminal proceedings would in their best interests not be produced.
They could just not bother responding to the FA at all if they have no intention of being involved in the game in the future.
I doubt the club’s current owner/management have the slightest idea what went on under Power during his early years..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
swindonmaniac
Offline
Posts: 3842
|
|
« Reply #3868 on: Wednesday, November 17, 2021, 07:41:39 » |
|
When will this ever end.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Life is a Rollercoaster - Just gotta ride it.
|
|
|
Robinz
Offline
Posts: 809
|
|
« Reply #3869 on: Wednesday, November 17, 2021, 09:00:03 » |
|
Dukey.. You make very good comments however what could have the club done differently.
Basically STFC were sold down the river by circumstances.
End of the day the FA /FL are there to help and assist including the governance of the constitution and rules set down by it's members. That said the question is What the hell could Swindon as a club and all supporters have done differently...My answer would be F@cking nothing.
In fact the current STFC are exceptionally fortunate to be in this situation and the FA / FL should hold up the club as an example of success and not to be punished.
We can only hope I'm right
COYMRs
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
