Batch
Not a Batch
 Online
Posts: 55293
|
 |
« Reply #1410 on: Saturday, March 7, 2015, 19:51:04 » |
|
Jesus wept, he has to be banned for that. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Online
Posts: 55293
|
|
« Reply #1411 on: Saturday, March 7, 2015, 20:53:30 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
 Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #1412 on: Saturday, March 7, 2015, 21:17:00 » |
|
Dirty norvern bastards.....nothing changes.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
@mwooly63
Offline
Posts: 3377
|
|
« Reply #1413 on: Saturday, March 7, 2015, 21:21:52 » |
|
I see your ugly face of football  And raise you a WTF one  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
|
« Reply #1414 on: Monday, March 16, 2015, 18:50:59 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
horlock07
Offline
Posts: 18726
Lives in Northern Bastard Outpost
|
|
« Reply #1415 on: Monday, March 16, 2015, 19:10:30 » |
|
They could have done with a longer sheet. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Red Frog
Not a Dave
Offline
Posts: 9045
Pondlife
|
|
« Reply #1416 on: Monday, March 16, 2015, 19:40:27 » |
|
In its judgment, the panel found that the original ruling had placed too much weight on objections from supporters. Yeah, why would the FA ever want to take any notice of those annoying wankers and their non-corporate agendas? This, in a sentence, sums up what's wrong with football.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Tout ce que je sais de plus sūr ą propos de la moralité et des obligations des hommes, c'est au football que je le dois. - Albert Camus
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #1417 on: Monday, March 23, 2015, 19:53:03 » |
|
Dyke waffling on again about English football.....he's trying to stop non EU players coming here, to the perceived detriment of home grown players. It's not that which annoys, but his example of Harry Kane....according to him, Kane, only got a chance, because of Sherwood...."he'd still be on loan at Millwall otherwise".....no acknowledgement that maybe Kane's half a season at The Den, scoring 9 goals as a 19 year old might have aided his development.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Online
Posts: 55293
|
|
« Reply #1418 on: Monday, March 23, 2015, 20:05:40 » |
|
."he'd still be on loan at Millwall otherwise"....
Wait, so lumping English players in lower league B teams wouldn't work then. What a fucking shock. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ghanimah
Offline
Posts: 3639
|
|
« Reply #1419 on: Monday, March 23, 2015, 21:17:30 » |
|
Dyke waffling on again about English football.....he's trying to stop non EU players coming here, to the perceived detriment of home grown players. It's not that which annoys, but his example of Harry Kane....according to him, Kane, only got a chance, because of Sherwood...."he'd still be on loan at Millwall otherwise".....no acknowledgement that maybe Kane's half a season at The Den, scoring 9 goals as a 19 year old might have aided his development.
And he's wrong, he can't "stop" non-EU players... For example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolpak_ruling |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"We perform the duties of freemen; we must have the privileges of freemen ..."
|
|
|
jonny72
Offline
Posts: 5554
|
|
« Reply #1420 on: Monday, March 23, 2015, 21:38:34 » |
|
If you read the whole article it appears the EU over turned that ruling, for some regions (including Africa) at least.... n 2008, the EU changed its reading of the Cotonou Agreement (the Association Agreement between the EU and the ACP countries).[6] It now stated that the Cotonou agreement should not be interpreted as mandating free movement of labour, but rather the free trade of goods and services. The Home Office were subsequently able to introduce new rules placing restrictions on Kolpak players, stating that only those who had held a valid work permit for four years had the right to be treated the same as EU citizens. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ghanimah
Offline
Posts: 3639
|
|
« Reply #1421 on: Monday, March 23, 2015, 22:31:16 » |
|
Yes, but with the passing of the Lisbon Treaty (2009) that is currently being challenged in the ECJ, which almost certainly will overturn that in the spirit of the Simutenkov judgement.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"We perform the duties of freemen; we must have the privileges of freemen ..."
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #1422 on: Monday, March 23, 2015, 22:40:25 » |
|
Yes, but with the passing of the Lisbon Treaty (2009) that is currently being challenged in the ECJ, which almost certainly will overturn that in the spirit of the Simutenkov judgement.
Mornington Crescent!! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nemo
Shit Bacon
Online
Posts: 21256
|
|
« Reply #1423 on: Monday, March 23, 2015, 22:46:17 » |
|
Mornington Crescent!!
No, no, that's an illegal move, you have to go via Blackfriars or take the DLR - but we know what happened to the last person who tried that. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Honkytonk
Offline
Posts: 4413
Whoo Whoo!
|
|
« Reply #1424 on: Monday, March 23, 2015, 23:14:04 » |
|
No, no, that's an illegal move, you have to go via Blackfriars or take the DLR - but we know what happened to the last person who tried that.
Jesus, I've seen some maverick playing in my time but take the DLR?! That is either true madness or utter genius. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
