BANGKOK RED
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 18:06:59 » |
|
People are going on as if these agents are revealing inside secrets of the club.
In reality they are just stating the bleedin obvious, that's my point. Of course we are looking at <pedantry> in negotiations with </pedantry> players.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16467
|
 |
« Reply #46 on: Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 18:13:16 » |
|
Why is it that this is being put out with great regularity in a public domain by a third party though, one which has no obligation to continually announce this. It makes them seem unproffesional, and ruins our image aswell imo
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
BANGKOK RED
|
 |
« Reply #47 on: Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 18:18:37 » |
|
I think they're tits.
But if saying something that we already know is all we have against them, I think we have nothing to worry about*
*I hold the right to reserve judgement until we get some players in.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spencer_White
|
 |
« Reply #48 on: Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 18:19:32 » |
|
People are going on as if these agents are revealing inside secrets of the club.
In reality they are just stating the bleedin obvious, that's my point. Of course we are looking at <pedantry> in negotiations with </pedantry> players.
They said they were going to announce STFC's new manager the day before Di Canio was announced as manager. That would be OK if that was just rumour and conjecture. But as Di Canio's agent they were right there in the negotiations. It was not their place to announce Di Canio as Swindon's manager. What if talks had broken down? What if Di Canio had wanted too much money and the club had moved on to someone else?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BANGKOK RED
|
 |
« Reply #49 on: Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 18:22:45 » |
|
They said they were going to announce STFC's new manager the day before Di Canio was announced as manager. That would be OK if that was just rumour and conjecture. But as Di Canio's agent they were right there in the negotiations.
It was not their place to announce Di Canio as Swindon's manager. What if talks had broken down? What if Di Canio had wanted too much money and the club had moved on to someone else?
I agree that was twatish of them, and that they are quite twatish in general. But I don't see the harm in them saying we are looking to get some players in. It's hardly ground breaking stuff.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Costanza
Offline
Posts: 10656
|
 |
« Reply #50 on: Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 18:24:33 » |
|
Di Canio aside, he's not saying anything of note and I don't recall ever reading "SWINDON FANS WATCH THIS SPACE. Signin comin soapy tit wank". The managerial stuff could have been done and dusted behind-the-scenes when he called it. Perhaps this is the way of the football world now. I'm surprised we don't know more than we do.
People ask this agent chap questions which is fair enough and he replies with yes, no or maybe.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57741
|
 |
« Reply #51 on: Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 18:26:22 » |
|
[/size][/size]
Don't worry BR, size isn't everything. On Elite agents. I find the way they conduct their business very unprofessional. But I still can't help looking at their tweets for information.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spencer_White
|
 |
« Reply #52 on: Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 18:34:30 » |
|
I agree that was twatish of them, and that they are quite twatish in general.
But I don't see the harm in them saying we are looking to get some players in. It's hardly ground breaking stuff.
You are doing my head in. Wasting my time. Bye.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BANGKOK RED
|
 |
« Reply #53 on: Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 18:37:19 » |
|
Oh dear.
Cya
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tails
Offline
Posts: 10184
Git facked
|
 |
« Reply #54 on: Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 18:59:02 » |
|
It was meant as an ironic poll, created due to all the moany bastards!
Maybe it was too subtle......
I know, I got that!! Mine was an ironic post, created due to all the moany bastards!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BANGKOK RED
|
 |
« Reply #55 on: Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 19:24:06 » |
|
Looks like their page has been deleted now anyway.
I'm still trying to figure out how repeating what everybody else already knows anyway can possibly manipulate anything?
Twatish and unprofessional, yeah.
Manipulative, how?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Don Rogers Shop
|
 |
« Reply #56 on: Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 19:41:03 » |
|
I don't get the fuss to be honest had a look at a few other agents on there and they are no different.
Weird how they seem to be getting loads of shit yet when the Adver report on friday we should be expecting signings on friday nothing is said.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BANGKOK RED
|
 |
« Reply #57 on: Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 19:55:09 » |
|
I might make up a talent agency twitter account and say that the xyz production company are on the look out for actors/performers etc. I might even say they are in or are due to have discussions with a few.
That'll throw the cat among the pigeons.
|
|
« Last Edit: Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 19:57:09 by BANGKOK RED »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
corner
Offline
Posts: 1198
|
 |
« Reply #58 on: Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 19:57:15 » |
|
Looks like their page has been deleted now anyway.
I'm still trying to figure out how repeating what everybody else already knows anyway can possibly manipulate anything?
Twatish and unprofessional, yeah.
Manipulative, how?
his page is still there, Its now, AgentDarren
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BANGKOK RED
|
 |
« Reply #59 on: Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 19:59:59 » |
|
his page is still there, Its now, AgentDarren
Cheers
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|