Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 [7] 8   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Clutching at straws / Good things about league 2  (Read 11221 times)
Spencer_White

« Reply #90 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 18:17:24 »

Our worst ever season since 58 when Div 3 and 4 formed was 82/83, when we finished 17th in Div 4. The recipe for such crapness, was an uninspiring manager Ken Beamish.  We had decent enough front players, the sort we can only dream about right now...Quinn Rowland Mayes, good wide men Hockaday and Garry Nelson, both went on to perform creditably at Div 2 level.

 Added to this was a sense of decay about the place...small crowds and negative football.

Nevertheless we did manage to escape, as we did in 06/07...the common factor both times was the dreaded spending money we haven't actually got, thereby enabling the acquisition of staff and players we couldn't really afford.  Not going to happen this time....

Look at Crewe....bring through young players sell them on, been stuck in Div 4 for a while now.

I never really took the board seriously when they said they wanted to run STFC as a business, and despite the way weve sold key players, I still dont take them seriously. They board is top heavy with people who wont want to waste their time watching crap. They might walk I suppose, which would mean we are right back where we were 3 years ago.

I am worried about the young players policy though. Much easier to sell players in L1 than L2. We need to get back sharpish and to do that we need some unfashionable but effective players.

We also need an exciting manager. Either a wheeler dealer or an ex player, and Fitton seems to want to steer well clear of these. I still think Danny Wilson would have been the best manager available to us for a L2 season.
« Last Edit: Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 18:25:35 by Spencer_White » Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #91 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 19:25:32 »

I never really took the board seriously when they said they wanted to run STFC as a business, and despite the way weve sold key players, I still dont take them seriously. They board is top heavy with people who wont want to waste their time watching crap. They might walk I suppose, which would mean we are right back where we were 3 years ago.

I am worried about the young players policy though. Much easier to sell players in L1 than L2. We need to get back sharpish and to do that we need some unfashionable but effective players.

We also need an exciting manager. Either a wheeler dealer or an ex player, and Fitton seems to want to steer well clear of these. I still think Danny Wilson would have been the best manager available to us for a L2 season.

What are your thoughts on Trollope?  Arriba has obviously heard something, and I said ages ago that Fitton liked his work at Rovers on a much smaller budget than STFC's.
Logged
Spencer_White

« Reply #92 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 20:18:38 »

What are your thoughts on Trollope?  Arriba has obviously heard something, and I said ages ago that Fitton liked his work at Rovers on a much smaller budget than STFC's.

Id certainly take him over Hart.

Question marks over whether Trollope has got the contacts in the game to get us 10+ new players up to the job?
Logged
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!

Offline Offline

Posts: 14511



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #93 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 20:20:27 »

Id certainly take him over Hart.

Question marks over whether Trollope has got the contacts in the game to get us 10+ new players up to the job?

How can anyone possibly have the faintest idea who Paul Trollope knows within football?

Logged
Spencer_White

« Reply #94 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 20:24:16 »

How can anyone possibly have the faintest idea who Paul Trollope knows within football?



I thought Lawrence did a lot of the signings?

Just thinking back to Dennis Wise and that summer with Bill Powers money, I think Wise was well in with the football agents, and that is never going to happen with this board.
Logged
Huwwy

Offline Offline

Posts: 243


"The world is my lobster"




Ignore
« Reply #95 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 20:30:52 »

I'd take Wilson over Trollope and, from what I've seen so far, Hart. My worry is that we'll have a crapish end to the season, but with an unlikely win or two along the way, and that will convince Fitton to stay with Hart as "he's got to know the players and the club" or some such crap. I think we need a wholesale clearout of players and management.
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #96 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 20:44:44 »

I'd take Wilson over Trollope and, from what I've seen so far, Hart.

Out of interest why? Hart has never had a more wins than losses ratio at any club he's been at....also Trollope has more career wins as a manager than all of Hart's totalled.

Hart is reputed to be a decent coach, but shit at recruitment....not exactly what we need.
Logged
leefer

Offline Offline

Posts: 12851





Ignore
« Reply #97 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 20:53:52 »

Just don't see the point of the Hart appointment.

Get a long term appointment in and let him(or her Smiley)get on with the rebuilding job now.
Fact is all Paul Hart will be doing is papering up the cracks...all that means is more time and energy wasted and money.
Stop fucking around...there is plenty of good managers out there champing at the bit,get someone in and let him/her get on with the job in hand.

Logged
london_red

Offline Offline

Posts: 2142





Ignore
« Reply #98 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 21:25:04 »

Just don't see the point of the Hart appointment.

Get a long term appointment in and let him(or her Smiley)get on with the rebuilding job now.
Fact is all Paul Hart will be doing is papering up the cracks...all that means is more time and energy wasted and money.
Stop fucking around...there is plenty of good managers out there champing at the bit,get someone in and let him/her get on with the job in hand.



To be fair had we got something out of the last two games people wouldn't be questioning a short term appointment.

Think the 'point' of hiring him was the fact that he's kept sides up the last two seasons and was a last ditch throw of the dice to retain our league 1 status this year.

Obviously in hindsight he's not quite had the immediate impact they were hoping for.
Logged
leefer

Offline Offline

Posts: 12851





Ignore
« Reply #99 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 21:39:43 »

To be fair had we got something out of the last two games people wouldn't be questioning a short term appointment.

Think the 'point' of hiring him was the fact that he's kept sides up the last two seasons and was a last ditch throw of the dice to retain our league 1 status this year.

Obviously in hindsight he's not quite had the immediate impact they were hoping for.

A proper new manager could have gave us the same impetus....and got things rolling for next season regardless of results.
Logged
london_red

Offline Offline

Posts: 2142





Ignore
« Reply #100 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 21:48:52 »

A proper new manager could have gave us the same impetus....and got things rolling for next season regardless of results.

Who could we have got though? No one who you'd want in long term would be keen on joining a sinking ship. Even if we go down I think we'll be a more attractive prospect for managers than when Wilson went, what with a bit of money to spend and the chances of getting a quick promotion on the CV.

Still leaves time to reshape the squad for next season, providing the board get cracking as soon as this one is over.
Logged
DiV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 32282


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #101 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 21:50:09 »

Gary Johnson went to Northampon

I think he'd have come here.
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21289





Ignore
« Reply #102 on: Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 22:03:50 »

What are your thoughts on Trollope?  Arriba has obviously heard something, and I said ages ago that Fitton liked his work at Rovers on a much smaller budget than STFC's.

i have had conversations with numerous people about the managerial job and trollopes name keeps cropping up.
these aint just normal stfc fans talking over a pint, but people who are involved in football or have friends-family in the game.
i'm not saying it will happen,but i aint heard 1 persons name mentioned as much as trollope's is at the moment.


i think the mounting pressure on the board might mean they go for someone more appealing to fans.
« Last Edit: Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 22:05:22 by arriba » Logged
4D
Or not 4D that is the question

Offline Offline

Posts: 21902


I can't bear it 🙄




Ignore
« Reply #103 on: Thursday, March 10, 2011, 00:06:04 »

what positives? Losing half our season ticket holders and crowds down to 4000-not to mention potential loss of sponsors. The board have orchastrated this shambles-you do not go from wembley finalists to bottom 4 from bad luck-it is sheer incompetence

The biggest positive is that Bart will be back more often.
Logged
mrverve

Offline Offline

Posts: 1429





Ignore
« Reply #104 on: Thursday, March 10, 2011, 10:25:01 »

Trollope's success at Rovers was when Lennie Lawerence was with him. Since Lawerence left, Rovers have gone down hill.

In League 2 I personally wouldn't want Hart or Trollope.

We missed the boat with Gary Johnson.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 [7] 8   Go Up
Print
Jump to: