carbonwhite
 Offline
Posts: 1939
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: Sunday, August 8, 2010, 17:31:46 » |
|
I disagree, at times its fine but if we win possession then we are left with only one outlet/target up top.
The midfield were at times leaving the strikers isolated and at other times pushing up too much en mass. That's where the real issue was.
well i thought when dossevi came way back to our corner flag won the ball took on 2 players we had JPM and prutton pushing up from midfield to support austin also rose was overlapping on the left side. i think when a strikers does that it means more people from the middle can push forward which can confuse the defence |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dogs
Offline
Posts: 828
|
|
« Reply #46 on: Sunday, August 8, 2010, 17:32:30 » |
|
Wouldn't mind seeing Mcgovern on the left, Dossevi on the right and ball and austin up front. Caddis in at RB.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jonny72
Offline
Posts: 5554
|
|
« Reply #47 on: Sunday, August 8, 2010, 17:34:29 » |
|
I thought Dossevi looked at his best when he was dropping back and going out wide. He didn't look like centre forward material to me, I reckon he could do well if given a free role to do his thing or as part of a 3 man front line. Of course, I could be talking shit as this is based on seeing him play for just 45 minutes.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57758
|
|
« Reply #48 on: Sunday, August 8, 2010, 17:35:10 » |
|
The changes I'd make:
Caddis for Manks,
Ferry for Prutton,
Dossevi to play 90 mins (if fit).
I wouldn't be surprised to see Austin rested though and Vince and Dossevi start. Oooh its too difficult picking our team at the moment!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JB_Swindon
|
|
« Reply #49 on: Sunday, August 8, 2010, 17:35:21 » |
|
Wouldn't mind seeing Mcgovern on the left, Dossevi on the right and ball and austin up front. Caddis in at RB.
Surley Dossevi on the left would be better ? He seems more versatile that JPM to me... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57758
|
|
« Reply #50 on: Sunday, August 8, 2010, 17:37:08 » |
|
well i thought when dossevi came way back to our corner flag won the ball took on 2 players we had JPM and prutton pushing up from midfield to support austin also rose was overlapping on the left side.
i think when a strikers does that it means more people from the middle can push forward which can confuse the defence
Its a fair comment. I wasn't criticising dossevi as such either, I'd just rather our midfielders did that job! On a side note, really looking forward to Tuesday, Prawn sarnies for me  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
carbonwhite
Offline
Posts: 1939
|
|
« Reply #51 on: Sunday, August 8, 2010, 17:38:37 » |
|
Its a fair comment. I wasn't criticising dossevi as such either, I'd just rather our midfielders did that job!On a side note, really looking forward to Tuesday, Prawn sarnies for me which they wasnt yesterday which is why he did it |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JB_Swindon
|
|
« Reply #52 on: Sunday, August 8, 2010, 17:59:50 » |
|
With the wealth of centre midfeilders we have at the club I think the best formation to use would be the Diamond. Chelsea used it last year and won the league. Newcastle used it on occasions Norwich used it and if I remember rightly Notts county used it too. These four teams won their leagues so I think it's fair to say it works. + The personell we have fits in with it.
On tuesday id go for
Lucas
Rose LJF Cuthbert Caddis
Douglas
Ferry Prutton
JPM
Austin Dossevi.
its gives the defence more cover in douglas who can will in one of the fullback positions when one goes forward. Ferry and Prutton can take turns for one to sit and one to go forward. JPM can be given a free role and can pretty much do what he likes. We'd scare the shit out of teams playing like this.Caddis marauding down the flanks with JPM occupying and austin occupying a defender while the rest of the midfeild flood the box!
what does everyone else reckon'? Im still fucking pissed of about yesterday but I reckon we'll pick oursleves up tuesday.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
Past glories motivate us when times are bleak.
Offline
Posts: 64664
Perfection is not attainable
|
|
« Reply #53 on: Sunday, August 8, 2010, 18:05:16 » |
|
If we played with a diamond formation in midfield then I would prefer a stronger centre back pairing if Rose and Caddis play as overlapping fullbacks/wingback, nothing against LFJ or Cuthbert but an experienced centre back alongside Cuffy would suit that formation better.
Yes I know LFJ was MOM yesterday but he always looks like he is going to make a mistake even when hes playing really well.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
From the station at Colchester
To the cells of Warrington
From the services at Leicester
To the slums of Northampton
We travel over England
And one day Europe too
Cos we all follow the Swindon
We're the famous Town End crew.
|
|
|
|
JB_Swindon
|
|
« Reply #54 on: Sunday, August 8, 2010, 18:08:17 » |
|
Yes I know LFJ was MOM yesterday but he always looks like he is going to make a mistake even when hes playing really well.
True that |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57758
|
|
« Reply #55 on: Sunday, August 8, 2010, 18:11:33 » |
|
Personally I don't think we should mess with the formation. We just need to play better.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
chalkies_shorts
|
|
« Reply #56 on: Sunday, August 8, 2010, 18:35:46 » |
|
Yes I know LFJ was MOM yesterday but he always looks like he is going to make a mistake even when hes playing really well.
And if my Aunty had a nob she'd be my uncle. LFJ may have looked as thuogh he's going to fuck up ............... but he didn't. He had a cracking game as a centre half and God knows how much covering he did for Rose who defensively looks shit althuogh its early days. The midfield also gave him fuck all cover. As for his distribution or dwelling on the ball too long - he had fuck all movement in front of him. The right wing was non existant as JPM was in the middle and the midfield were bollocks. I've seen enough of JFL to see there is a really good player in there. He's athletic, good in the air and fast and he tries to play the ball out of trouble. Where he struggles is his positional play but he's only 22 or therabouts and playing centre half - he's still learning the game. He's going to fuck up as is Scotty as is Morrison. The best thing we can do is get behind him because one day we might just make a nice tidy sum out of him. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Doore
|
|
« Reply #57 on: Sunday, August 8, 2010, 18:39:23 » |
|
And if my Aunty had a nob she'd be my uncle. LFJ may have looked as thuogh he's going to fuck up ............... but he didn't. He had a cracking game as a centre half and God knows how much covering he did for Rose who defensively looks shit althuogh its early days. The midfield also gave him fuck all cover.
As for his distribution or dwelling on the ball too long - he had fuck all movement in front of him. The right wing was non existant as JPM was in the middle and the midfield were bollocks.
I've seen enough of JFL to see there is a really good player in there. He's athletic, good in the air and fast and he tries to play the ball out of trouble. Where he struggles is his positional play but he's only 22 or therabouts and playing centre half - he's still learning the game. He's going to fuck up as is Scotty as is Morrison.
The best thing we can do is get behind him because one day we might just make a nice tidy sum out of him.
The world is going mad - I'm finding myself agreeing with you again Chalkie. You cunt. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
chalkies_shorts
|
|
« Reply #58 on: Sunday, August 8, 2010, 18:41:30 » |
|
Fuck off yourself. If we're agreeing a lot then I'm turning into a cunt like you when I thought I was a completely different kind of cunt - now I've got to consider the fact I might be a schizo cunt - you cunt.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Doore
|
|
« Reply #59 on: Sunday, August 8, 2010, 18:52:37 » |
|
Fuck off yourself. If we're agreeing a lot then I'm turning into a cunt like you when I thought I was a completely different kind of cunt - now I've got to consider the fact I might be a schizo cunt - you cunt.
You flirt, you. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
