Don Rogers Shop
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: Thursday, July 29, 2010, 09:55:24 » |
|
Can maybe see McGovern playing on the left for this. Got a feeling we may see a different formation this year aswell
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
A Gent Orange
|
 |
« Reply #46 on: Thursday, July 29, 2010, 10:07:04 » |
|
Wilson does seems to be looking at a diamond midfield and a system with out and out wingers (well JPM on the right with O'Brien/Ball) so it looks like we'll be equipped to play in a number of different ways.
Just wondering if that does mean Prutton at the top with Douglas in front of the back four and Caddis and Rose allowed to really get forward, beyond the tucked in midfielders of Ferry and McGovern.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jonny72
Offline
Posts: 5554
|
 |
« Reply #47 on: Thursday, July 29, 2010, 10:24:29 » |
|
I liked the look of the Brazil formation in the WC, with two holding midfielders sat in front of the defence, due to the multitude of options it gives you. The full backs can get forward more knowing that there is cover. Putting three midfielders in front of the holding midfielders means you can easily revert to a four man midfield, or have the wide midfielders push forward as wingers. Plus the central midfielder can push forward more. Something like:
Austin Ball - Ferry - JPM Prutton - Douglas Rose - LJF - Cuthbert - Caddis Lucas
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bob's Orange
Has brain escape barriers
Offline
Posts: 29803
|
 |
« Reply #48 on: Thursday, July 29, 2010, 10:26:17 » |
|
I liked the look of the Brazil formation in the WC, with two holding midfielders sat in front of the defence, due to the multitude of options it gives you. The full backs can get forward more knowing that there is cover. Putting three midfielders in front of the holding midfielders means you can easily revert to a four man midfield, or have the wide midfielders push forward as wingers. Plus the central midfielder can push forward more. Something like:
Austin Ball - Ferry - JPM Prutton - Douglas Rose - LJF - Cuthbert - Caddis Lucas
I would probably swap Prutton with Ferry.
|
|
|
Logged
|
we've been to Aberdeen, we hate the Hibs, they make us spew up, so make some noise, the gorgie boys, for Hearts in Europe.
|
|
|
Sippo
Living in the 80s
Offline
Posts: 15614
I ain't gettin on no plane fool
|
 |
« Reply #49 on: Thursday, July 29, 2010, 10:32:20 » |
|
Caddis or Ferry haven't signed yet...
|
|
|
Logged
|
If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
 |
« Reply #50 on: Thursday, July 29, 2010, 13:36:43 » |
|
I liked the look of the Brazil formation in the WC, with two holding midfielders sat in front of the defence, due to the multitude of options it gives you. The full backs can get forward more knowing that there is cover. Putting three midfielders in front of the holding midfielders means you can easily revert to a four man midfield, or have the wide midfielders push forward as wingers. Plus the central midfielder can push forward more. Something like:
Austin Ball - Ferry - JPM Prutton - Douglas Rose - LJF - Cuthbert - Caddis Lucas
Not criticsing that in theory, but don't we always come unstuck when we try playing fancy (basically anything other than 4-4-2/4-5-1) formations?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFCROB
|
 |
« Reply #51 on: Thursday, July 29, 2010, 13:46:04 » |
|
I liked the look of the Brazil formation in the WC, with two holding midfielders sat in front of the defence, due to the multitude of options it gives you. The full backs can get forward more knowing that there is cover. Putting three midfielders in front of the holding midfielders means you can easily revert to a four man midfield, or have the wide midfielders push forward as wingers. Plus the central midfielder can push forward more. Something like:
Austin Ball - Ferry - JPM Prutton - Douglas Rose - LJF - Cuthbert - Caddis Lucas
I would probably swap Prutton with Ferry.
Would have to agree with Bobs Orange about swapping Prutton and ferry around. Mainly because Ferry is more defensive in his play than Prutton and Prutton is more attack minded.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC-4-LIFE
|
 |
« Reply #52 on: Thursday, July 29, 2010, 14:53:13 » |
|
Lucas, Caddis, Cuthbert, Lescinel, Rose, Prutton, Ferry, Douglas, McGovern, Ball, Austin
?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jonny72
Offline
Posts: 5554
|
 |
« Reply #53 on: Thursday, July 29, 2010, 15:32:15 » |
|
Not criticsing that in theory, but don't we always come unstuck when we try playing fancy (basically anything other than 4-4-2/4-5-1) formations?
Maybe, but the difference now is that we might just have the right players to play something different. Having said that, the big problem I have with formations ending with a 1 is that you need midfielders and wingers that can score a lot of goals, not sure we are quite there yet. But what I like about that formation is that it can quickly switch in to something else. You get a 4-5-1 with the midfielders dropping deep in with the holding players, or a 4-4-2 with the wide midfielders dropping back and the central midfielder pushing up. All without having to make any substitutions. I always saw Ferry as the more attacking out of him and Douglas. With a bit more freedom to play an attacking role we could get the best out of him, plus he hasn't got the strength to play a defensive / holding role (though that will most likely improve over time).
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 15073
|
 |
« Reply #54 on: Thursday, July 29, 2010, 20:34:06 » |
|
I liked the look of the Brazil formation in the WC, with two holding midfielders sat in front of the defence, due to the multitude of options it gives you. The full backs can get forward more knowing that there is cover. Putting three midfielders in front of the holding midfielders means you can easily revert to a four man midfield, or have the wide midfielders push forward as wingers. Plus the central midfielder can push forward more. Something like:
Austin Ball - Ferry - JPM Prutton - Douglas Rose - LJF - Cuthbert - Caddis Lucas
That team doesn't look right at all...I mean for a start, why oh why would you play your best striker in goal. And Lucas up front? You're playing a left back on the right wing....I could go on all night 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leefer
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
 |
« Reply #55 on: Thursday, July 29, 2010, 21:13:20 » |
|
I think O'Brien has pace. Little footballing ability though. Willing to give him some leeway, but I may not be tolerant for too long.
I'd need to see more positional awareness and defensive ability before I warm to his presence in the team.
He is a winger...fuck the defensive ability...thats the modern day disease. Give him the ball and let him deliver it into the box,if he dosnt deliver drop him...dont not play him because of defensive shite.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
The_Plagiarist
|
 |
« Reply #56 on: Thursday, July 29, 2010, 21:29:47 » |
|
Smith
Smith Smith Smith Smith
Smith Smith Smith Smith
Smith Smith
Subs: Smith Douglas Smith Smith Smith
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 15073
|
 |
« Reply #57 on: Sunday, August 1, 2010, 16:32:19 » |
|
I am 99.99% certain that Ferry and Caddis will sign but I am assuming DW isn't going to throw them straight in on Saturday. If that assumption is correct (which of course it may not be), I think the team largely picks itself. The only question marks for me are who plays in Greer and Paynter's positions. So I am going for:
GK..Lucas
RB..Amankwah CB..Cuthbert CB..LJF (Couldn't decide between him and Morrison but based this on the positive comments on here about LJF's performance yesterday) LB..Rose
RM..JPM CM..Prutton CM..Douglas LM..Ball
ST..Austin ST..Pericard (I think even if we sign Dossevi, DW will still start with big Vince up front and see how it goes)
Then subs will be Smith, Ferry, Caddis.......blah. blah, blah whatever
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Doore
|
 |
« Reply #58 on: Sunday, August 1, 2010, 16:33:24 » |
|
I am 99.99% certain that Ferry and Caddis will sign but I am assuming DW isn't going to throw them straight in on Saturday. If that assumption is correct (which of course it may not be), I think the team largely picks itself. The only question marks for me are who plays in Greer and Paynter's positions. So I am going for:
GK..Lucas
RB..Amankwah CB..Cuthbert CB..LJF (Couldn't decide between him and Morrison but based this on the positive comments on here about LJF's performance yesterday) LB..Rose
RM..JPM CM..Prutton CM..Douglas LM..Ball
ST..Austin ST..Pericard (I think even if we sign Dossevi, DW will still start with big Vince up front and see how it goes)
Then subs will be Smith, Ferry, Caddis.......whatever
Completely in agreement.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
Past glories motivate us when times are bleak.
Offline
Posts: 64664
Perfection is not attainable
|
 |
« Reply #59 on: Sunday, August 1, 2010, 17:15:02 » |
|
I am 99.99% certain that Ferry and Caddis will sign but I am assuming DW isn't going to throw them straight in on Saturday. If that assumption is correct (which of course it may not be), I think the team largely picks itself. The only question marks for me are who plays in Greer and Paynter's positions. So I am going for:
GK..Lucas
RB..Amankwah CB..Cuthbert CB..LJF (Couldn't decide between him and Morrison but based this on the positive comments on here about LJF's performance yesterday) LB..Rose
RM..JPM CM..Prutton CM..Douglas LM..Ball
ST..Austin ST..Pericard (I think even if we sign Dossevi, DW will still start with big Vince up front and see how it goes)
Then subs will be Smith, Ferry, Caddis.......blah. blah, blah whatever
Looks pretty close to me too.
|
|
|
Logged
|
From the station at Colchester To the cells of Warrington From the services at Leicester To the slums of Northampton
We travel over England And one day Europe too
Cos we all follow the Swindon We're the famous Town End crew.
|
|
|
|