Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: I'll buy a pint for the first TEF'er who can...  (Read 1916 times)
The_Plagiarist

« Reply #15 on: Sunday, June 6, 2010, 18:36:48 »

I'm flying the flag for basic maths on this one:



Field = 3,000,000,000 m2 (3,000 km2)
Rainfall = 0.48m per m2 per year

0.48 x 3,000,000,000 = 1,444,000,000 m3 of rainfall
0.75 of that finds its way into the river = 1,080,000,000 cubic metres of water per year

River crosssection = 80m2 (20 x 4)

so 1,080,000,000 / 80 = 13,500,000 metres of water flows through that river crosssection per year

so the speed = 13,500,000 / 365days / 24hours / 60minutes / 60seconds = 0.428 metres per second


Degree level engineering it aint. Suicide
Logged
BANGKOK RED

« Reply #16 on: Sunday, June 6, 2010, 19:21:57 »

Would it be a constant though.

Surely when the water in the field is deeper, the increased pressure would force it into the river quicker therefore increasing the flow.
Logged
Nijholts Nuts

Offline Offline

Posts: 1354





Ignore
« Reply #17 on: Sunday, June 6, 2010, 19:33:19 »

A lot of it is hypothetical, obviously there is no field that is 3000k square and in real life there would be a lot of other contributing factors. I was revising fluid flow so thats all the question encompassed.
Logged

I only dream of Claire Sweeney
BANGKOK RED

« Reply #18 on: Sunday, June 6, 2010, 19:36:32 »

In which case the correct answer would be: "how the fook do you expect me to answer the question without knowing all of the parameters".

It's a bit like asking "How long is a piece of string"
Logged
Nijholts Nuts

Offline Offline

Posts: 1354





Ignore
« Reply #19 on: Sunday, June 6, 2010, 19:41:46 »

Degree level engineering it aint. Suicide

Im a University and it was a tutorial question given to me, you do the maths..
Logged

I only dream of Claire Sweeney
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36336




« Reply #20 on: Sunday, June 6, 2010, 20:26:29 »

Would it be a constant though.

Surely when the water in the field is deeper, the increased pressure would force it into the river quicker therefore increasing the flow.

That's why it's average flow Einstein Wink
Logged
The_Plagiarist

« Reply #21 on: Sunday, June 6, 2010, 20:29:59 »


you're a university I'm a library, go figure...

Logged
BrightonRed

Offline Offline

Posts: 1126





Ignore
« Reply #22 on: Sunday, June 6, 2010, 22:47:42 »

Living up to your name then Plagiarist?  Wink

3,000km^2 = 3,000,000,000m^2
48cm = 0.48m
Volume of water that falls annually = 0.48 x 3,000,000,000 = 1,440,000,000m^3
Only 75% exits via the river = 0.75 x 1,440,000,000 = 1,080,000,000m^3 per year
1 year = 31,536,000 seconds
1,080,000,000 / 31,536,000 = 34.25m^3/sec
Average Velocity = Flow Rate / Cross Sectional Area
= 34.25m^3/sec / 80m^2
0.428m/s

I'm flying the flag for basic maths on this one:
Field = 3,000,000,000 m2 (3,000 km2)
Rainfall = 0.48m per m2 per year
0.48 x 3,000,000,000 = 1,444,000,000 m3 of rainfall
0.75 of that finds its way into the river = 1,080,000,000 cubic metres of water per year
River crosssection = 80m2 (20 x 4)
so 1,080,000,000 / 80 = 13,500,000 metres of water flows through that river crosssection per year
so the speed = 13,500,000 / 365days / 24hours / 60minutes / 60seconds = 0.428 metres per second
Degree level engineering it aint. Suicide
Logged

nicotine, valium, vicodin, marijuana, ecstasy and alcohol...
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: