So if he didn't really want to be here and made this quite clear in his attitude at least on the pitch, why did he keep playing ? Surely you would have thought it more in our interests as a club to bring on Macklin (for experience) or Peacock (to put one of our own players in the shop window if we want him to move on) instead of Hutch in the last 15 minutes game after game.
Unless there was something in the loan agreement whereby Celtic paid more of his wages if he played every game, I cannot understand why he would play ?
I think that's puzzling a lot of people
