sonicyouth
 Offline
Posts: 22352
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 23:46:01 » |
|
he posted something suspiciously close to child porn. he can fuck off and die.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 23:48:27 » |
|
you fucking wuss, the camera was miles away for all you know it's a painting
we want mickey back!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mrs_spacey
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 23:51:59 » |
|
you fucking wuss, the camera was miles away for all you know it's a painting
we want mickey back! fuck off dave and grow up |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 23:52:55 » |
|
i think i have to agree with SY and Mrs Spacey.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 23:58:05 » |
|
you fucking wuss, the camera was miles away for all you know it's a painting
we want mickey back! fuck off dave and grow up oh dear |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 23:59:40 » |
|
dave, do yourself a favour and shut up.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:02:46 » |
|
accusing someone of posting child porn is not very fucking clever though is it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:03:23 » |
|
neither is posting it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:05:18 » |
|
Was it ?
i've always loved Mickey but if it was kiddie porn then he and everyone else who wants him back can fuck right off!
Get a grip people!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
/
W56196272
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3907
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:05:20 » |
|
accusing someone of posting child porn is not very fucking clever though is it hes hardly accusing mickey, we all fuckin saw it |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:08:52 » |
|
yeah but whose to say they were kids? mickey inferred it but to be honest i'm sure he wouldn't actually go that far.
some people blow everything out of proportion on here. it's the big bad fucking internet and theres much worse on it than a blurry photo of a few naked indeterminable females.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:10:55 » |
|
maybe it was child porn, maybe it wasn't. maybe there is worse stuff, maybe there isn't.
either way, this is not the place to post it.
i'm not having this conversation dave, not here, not now, not ever. do yourself a favour and get over this whole martyrdom fantasy you've got.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mrs_spacey
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:11:14 » |
|
yeah but whose to say they were kids? mickey inferred it but to be honest i'm sure he wouldn't actually go that far.
some people blow everything out of proportion on here. it's the big bad fucking internet and theres much worse on it than a blurry photo of a few naked indeterminable females. dave why do you like to look at pictures of naked children? You are fucking sick in the head. Go get some help. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3907
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:11:22 » |
|
they were hardly adults were they dave
ive never had a probably with slick mick but child porn is unforgivable
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 00:14:34 » |
|
maybe it was child porn, maybe it wasn't. maybe there is worse stuff, maybe there isn't.
either way, this is not the place to post it.
i'm not having this conversation dave, not here, not now, not ever. do yourself a favour and get over this whole martyrdom fantasy you've got. then get off your fucking high horse! you truly think i'd be going into this if i thought mickey posted pictures of minors being sexually exploited? if you're "not having this conversation" then don't preach to me about martyrdom. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
