mexico red
Offline
Posts: 11771
Demasiado no es demasiado
|
|
« Reply #570 on: Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:29:51 » |
|
cox you judas cunt. hope we get them in the cup so i can boo him.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC_Gazza
|
|
« Reply #571 on: Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:31:04 » |
|
perhaps teh WBA friendly was part of the deal then?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC Bart
Offline
Posts: 1114
|
|
« Reply #572 on: Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:53:24 » |
|
How come Rovers keep hold of Lambert yet we cannot keep hold of Cox
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mexico red
Offline
Posts: 11771
Demasiado no es demasiado
|
|
« Reply #573 on: Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:54:44 » |
|
hahaha
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC4LIFE
Fence Fucker
Offline
Posts: 2785
|
|
« Reply #574 on: Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:55:22 » |
|
Haha, hello Bart.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC_Gazza
|
|
« Reply #575 on: Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:57:58 » |
|
How come Rovers keep hold of Lambert yet we cannot keep hold of Cox
Simple Answer: Cox is 3 times the player Lambert is or every will be and by the way Welcome back, yeah what a lack of ambition how dare the board sell our prized assett for £2.5M instead of letting him walk away for free next season, Bastards. FITTON OUT!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Don Rogers Shop
|
|
« Reply #576 on: Monday, June 29, 2009, 08:58:52 » |
|
He actually made me laugh with that. I now await eagerly his serious reply stating it was serious and that we are going no where and have no ambition made worse that his bloke only left soya milk in the fridge which made it impossible to enjoy his shredded wheat.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC_Gazza
|
|
« Reply #577 on: Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:04:57 » |
|
He actually made me laugh with that. I now await eagerly his serious reply stating it was serious and that we are going no where and have no ambition made worse that his bloke only left soya milk in the fridge which made it impossible to enjoy his shredded wheat.
I expect something along the lines of "oh well if we lose Cox we will get relegated costing us more than 2.5M (when I think it is 250k) or how we should signed him to a long term contract last season (which we tried to do). This is actually the best deal we have had for a player in ages... well in terms of money, new record transfer fee which is not a bad return from 250K last year (admittedly Reading get a decent cut). i am sure some bollocks about how all the 2.5M should be used on players etc.. I would say maybe 750k at the very most spent towards wages, playing squad etc combined. and 1M to reading (approx) and the rest towards paying the shortfall that we will have for this season so we break even for once!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
The Grim Reaper
Offline
Posts: 1748
|
|
« Reply #578 on: Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:05:15 » |
|
Good deal for player and club. I'm sure Wilson will get some of the money to spend but lets not get carried away. We're still a loss making club and i'm sure Fitton will want to address that!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
|
« Reply #579 on: Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:07:12 » |
|
Wouldn't West Brom wait for a new manager to be employed before buying Cox ?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
suttonred
Offline
Posts: 12510
|
|
« Reply #580 on: Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:08:46 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32418
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #581 on: Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:10:38 » |
|
How come Rovers keep hold of Lambert yet we cannot keep hold of Cox
....because teams want to sign Cox yet no one wants Lambert. Plus - Lambert wasnt L1s top scorer
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC_Gazza
|
|
« Reply #582 on: Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:21:35 » |
|
Bye Bye Cox, Cheers for the goals! Good Luck at WBA!! See you in pre-season!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55586
|
|
« Reply #583 on: Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:27:29 » |
|
Inevitable I suppose. He is too good for what we can offer him right now. So thanks for the goals and the cash Cox, and good luck.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC_Gazza
|
|
« Reply #584 on: Monday, June 29, 2009, 09:29:14 » |
|
Wonder what Ibon Arrieta is up to these days?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|