|
santasdead
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Monday, May 4, 2009, 19:26:35 » |
|
Loads of options if he needs replacing. a season long loan from a proven championship fringe player,a lowere prem reserve/youth (just like cox once was). razak's in the frame is wilson can get him upto scratch in pre season - if he's given a contract.
I don't think any discussion about players we need is relevant until we know who's definately in the squad next season. It will be an interesting summer anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
 Offline
Posts: 33888
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Monday, May 4, 2009, 19:28:24 » |
|
I think everybody hopes he'll sign a new contract and hangs about for another season. I think it would be silly to expect it though.
what Ben said. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Talk Talk
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Monday, May 4, 2009, 19:31:44 » |
|
what Ben said.
What I said. You don't drink Guinness though  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pumbaa
Ha, no cunt in my title anymore. Oh.....
Offline
Posts: 6351
Fartmeister
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Monday, May 4, 2009, 19:42:11 » |
|
Am I right in thinking he's got another year left on his contract?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Monday, May 4, 2009, 19:43:06 » |
|
Like Tommy Mooney?
Yep, miss a penalty and sod off to Oxford - great  (worst conclusion to a STFC career ever?) |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: Monday, May 4, 2009, 19:45:17 by Rich Pullen »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33888
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Monday, May 4, 2009, 19:46:25 » |
|
Am I right in thinking he's got another year left on his contract?
Yes.... Unless he signs a year extension, he will be sold because there will be offers and his value is only going to decrease as we move towards June '10 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
michael
The Dude Abides
Offline
Posts: 3237
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Monday, May 4, 2009, 19:48:29 » |
|
Here is an interesting fact for you: Would you believe that, basic, he is not the highest paid player at the club?
He is very highly incentivised (sp?).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pumbaa
Ha, no cunt in my title anymore. Oh.....
Offline
Posts: 6351
Fartmeister
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Monday, May 4, 2009, 19:48:39 » |
|
Yes....
Unless he signs a year extension, he will be sold because there will be offers and his value is only going to decrease as we move towards June '10
Exactly my thought process. Cash in now rather than risk losing him for nothing in 12 months (assuming he doesn't sign an extension). I'd much rather he stayed mind, signing an extension in the process. I can dream on...... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33888
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Monday, May 4, 2009, 19:52:29 » |
|
Here is an interesting fact for you: Would you believe that, basic, he is not the highest paid player at the club?
He is very highly incentivised (sp?).
No, I wouldnt believe it Exactly my thought process. Cash in now rather than risk losing him for nothing in 12 months (assuming he doesn't sign an extension).
I'd much rather he stayed mind, signing an extension in the process. I can dream on......
He's only just turned 22 so wouldnt go for nothing. We'd get compensation for developing him for 2 seasons. Wouldnt be even a 10th of what he is worth. Parkin signed a year extension and gave us an extra year so Cox might. Of course Parkin wasnt as a good as Cox, didnt get as much media attention as Cox and no one put in bids for Parkin like the bids we will probably/hopefully/definitely get for Cox. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leefer
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Monday, May 4, 2009, 19:56:03 » |
|
Alot of people say Posh baught there way out of the division,maybe true but also they turned down 2million for Mclean....Wolves being the bidders,they didnt sell,for this club to move on weve got to stop selling...ive got a sneaky feeling Cox will stay one more season.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Talk Talk
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Monday, May 4, 2009, 19:56:29 » |
|
The best move of the summer would be to replace Budgie with DV I reckon. I'm beginning to sound like a parrot...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Monday, May 4, 2009, 19:58:08 » |
|
A retarded parrot.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33888
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Monday, May 4, 2009, 19:58:14 » |
|
The difference is Mclean had more than a year left on his contract. He was then and still is now contracted till 2011
If Cox had 2 years left then we'd keep him.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pumbaa
Ha, no cunt in my title anymore. Oh.....
Offline
Posts: 6351
Fartmeister
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Monday, May 4, 2009, 19:58:43 » |
|
He's only just turned 22 so wouldnt go for nothing. We'd get compensation for developing him for 2 seasons. Wouldnt be even a 10th of what he is worth.
Parkin signed a year extension and gave us an extra year so Cox might. Of course Parkin wasnt as a good as Cox, didnt get as much media attention as Cox and no one put in bids for Parkin like the bids we will probably/hopefully/definitely get for Cox.
Forgot about the age/compo thing. Point well made. I still say cash in though (at the right price). |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leefer
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Monday, May 4, 2009, 19:59:30 » |
|
The difference is Mclean had more than a year left on his contract. He was then and still is now contracted till 2011
If Cox had 2 years left then we'd keep him.
Not sure about that. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
