|
Don Rogers Shop
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Friday, August 1, 2008, 11:38:07 » |
|
haha quality last year this would of been the boards fault
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
 Offline
Posts: 16120
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Friday, August 1, 2008, 11:53:04 » |
|
haha quality last year this would of been the boards fault
Well, in a roundabout way, it still is the old board's fault!! I can understand why the shirts aren't here now, as the club didn't sort out its sponsorship deal until very late. However, having agreed to supply the shirts Lotto are entirely at fault for the club shop not having any stock. I was very pleased to see how the club are clearly as unimpressed as us, judging by the article yesterday |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
donkey
Cheers!
Offline
Posts: 7098
He headed a football.
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Friday, August 1, 2008, 12:10:36 » |
|
I'd like a shirt for my birthday....8th June...what do you reckon? Any chance?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
donkey tells the truth
I headed the ball. eeeeeeeeeeeeeee-aaaaaaaawwwwwww |
|
|
Leggett
Offline
Posts: 7862
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Friday, August 1, 2008, 12:11:55 » |
|
next year, quite possibly.
crewe have only just unvailed their kit today, they're with lotto too, they've had some 'issues' too. fucking lotto.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fuck you Leggett, fuck you.
|
|
|
Luci
Offline
Posts: 10862
Fatbury's Stalker
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Friday, August 1, 2008, 12:12:27 » |
|
haha quality last year this would of been the boards fault
Course it was their fault - they contracted them as the shirt suppliers! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Don Rogers Shop
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Friday, August 1, 2008, 14:00:44 » |
|
when nobody would touch us with a barge pole but i know what your saying.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Friday, August 1, 2008, 15:28:09 » |
|
I bet QPR didn't have any issues, as they signed a multi-million pound deal with them when the billionaires took over earlier in the year.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Leggett
Offline
Posts: 7862
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Friday, August 1, 2008, 19:46:54 » |
|
indeed. but have you seen their away and 3rd kits? re-bodged versions of ours, aparently the '2009 design'. well done, you've taken 3 years to update a style of kit, when nike/puma/adidas/etc rework theirs EVERY FUCKING YEAR.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fuck you Leggett, fuck you.
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Friday, August 1, 2008, 20:18:19 » |
|
Course it was their fault - they contracted them as the shirt suppliers!
Being fair, they weren't to know this would have happened. At least we didn't use Dunwoody again. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Whits
Morphined Up
Offline
Posts: 8136
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Friday, August 1, 2008, 22:28:45 » |
|
I bet QPR didn't have any issues, as they signed a multi-million pound deal with them when the billionaires took over earlier in the year.
The QPR shirts have arrived but don't have the sponsor name on there apprently...not sure if it was in the plan or not! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Plays in midfield and his name is Tommy Miller,
signed him from Huddersfield his name is Tommy Miller,
first touch is average but his second is a killer,
heeeeeey Tommy Miller!
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Friday, August 1, 2008, 22:32:51 » |
|
Ha thats the best "nothing to do with us" post ever.
does it really matter?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
/
W56196272
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Saturday, August 2, 2008, 00:43:29 » |
|
Being fair, they weren't to know this would have happened. At least we didn't use Dunwoody again.
No, they couldn't absolutely know it would happen. But then signing the cheapest deal you possibly can while still getting actual shirts does make it that bit more likely you're going to be right down the bottom of the queue for getting anything approaching service or even a proper account manager. Hypothetically speaking, of course |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Saturday, August 2, 2008, 00:49:40 » |
|
Well if the new lot knew Lotto were shit (actual evidence to suggest this) they should have ditched them before the end of the season.
Of course it was an awful business decision, but we could have offered more money as incentive to get them here on time, a bonus if you like, or just binned them off.
Not that I am blaming the board at all, but I think it comes down to one of those shitty disappointing moments and Lotto are the real culprits.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ibelieveinmrreeves
Should've gone to Specsavers
Offline
Posts: 3857
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Saturday, August 2, 2008, 08:52:25 » |
|
I think the board probably had bigger fish to fry than kit manufacturer when they took over.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Even men with steel hearts love to see a dog on the pitch.
|
|
|
|
STFC_Gazzza
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Saturday, August 2, 2008, 08:53:53 » |
|
The QPR shirts have arrived but don't have the sponsor name on there apprently...not sure if it was in the plan or not!
Well they wouldnt anyway after 2 washes so to be honest its a good thing, just saves getting all the crap in the washing machine. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
