STFC Transfer Rumours

[Pericardinho]

People are concerned because it was made public that Zavier Austin was to be Vice Chairman of the club. Via an official club statement.

It didn't happen, and yet on several occasions since he still describes himself as so. He's literally going around telling people that's what he is, and taking people onto the pitch. Offering himself out to protestors. Not things a matchday guest would do.

This rhetoric that you can't be concerned now because he was doing shady stuff in the background 7 years prior is complete nonsense. There's a lot more information that's been made publicly available. People have been educated.

I think you're just arguing for the sake of arguing to be honest.

[FreddySTFC!]

As a betting man, I would lump on Austin being the true owner of the football club.
Morfuni just acting out as his front man.
Will be very interesting if Morfuni ends up being disqualified as a director as a result of his court case in Oz.
Where we go from there, I'm not so sure!

[Exiled Bob]

So the issue is, then, what Austin has been saying, rather than Morfuni's transparency. Well, I agree with you. As I already told you, I'm not arguing about it, merely pointing out that Morfuni has been transparent. But you seem intent on putting words in my mouth to create an argument. I also didn't say that "you can't be concerned now because he was doing shady stuff in the background 7 years prior"...you made that up. I asked why you only became concerned about him after Morfuni took over, when he had already been at the club for at least 7 years.

For the record, Morfuni has stated, publically, when asked directly on Austin's role, that he has no official role in the club. Austin spouting off, saying otherwise is exactly that. Austin spouting off.

[Pericardinho]

So the issue is, then, what Austin has been saying, rather than Morfuni's transparency. Well, I agree with you. As I already told you, I'm not arguing about it, merely pointing out that Morfuni has been transparent.

Yes. You have pointed out about 5 times now over multiple threads that Morfuni has been transparent about ORIGINALLY wanting ZA as VC. I'm not sure why you keep mentioning it, because I'm yet to see somebody who disagrees with you on this.

Transparency since this though has been about as clear as mud.

But you seem intent on putting words in my mouth to create an argument. I also didn't say that "you can't be concerned now because he was doing shady stuff in the background 7 years prior"...you made that up. I asked why you only became concerned about him after Morfuni took over, when he had already been at the club for at least 7 years.

I became 'concerned' the minute a convicted criminal was going to be running the football club in Clem's absence, because of an official club statement pretty much telling me so. Sorry if you take issue with that. I can't be concerned about something I previously didn't know about.

For the record, Morfuni has stated, publically, when asked directly on Austin's role, that he has no official role in the club. Austin spouting off, saying otherwise is exactly that. Austin spouting off.

Oh well that's ok then! Clem has never lied before so that's settled my nerves.

Are you SERIOUSLY taking what CM says at face value?

[Exiled Bob]

What is it you think I'm arguing with you about?

How many times do I need to repeat (since you've evidently noted what my original point was and have counted how many times I've said it) that I agree with you on all the issues about Austin?

[Pericardinho]

Are you broken? what sort of response is that.

Anyway. Back to transfer rumours. I don't even know how we got here.

[Exiled Bob]

Are you broken? what sort of response is that.

Anyway. Back to transfer rumours. I don't even know how we got here.

Well, since I have stated above that I agree with you....I don't know what it is you think we disagree about.