Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
 Offline
Posts: 36336
|
 |
« Reply #180 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 23:35:26 » |
|
I did think at first it was Pook going off, but he was going towards the touch line too quick for it to be a sub.
Plus it had to be McNamee, dont think we'll ever get a full 90 out of him. On what basis? I think he's looked fitter every game (ooh errr) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Colin Todd
Offline
Posts: 3318
|
|
« Reply #181 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 23:35:51 » |
|
on a more positive note, 5 points off the play offs again....................
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3902
|
|
« Reply #182 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 23:40:11 » |
|
looked way way better with jp back on the wing. him and comminges combine superbly, whereas roberts' style doesn't allow commingues to overlap which he is so effective at
thought everyone had a good game to be honest - after the first minute and the odd decent bit of play from brooker town were never in much trouble. pook did the simple things very well today
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #183 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 23:42:16 » |
|
What a good performance. Everyone played well. We looked to get the ball on the deck and we played some very good stuff in the second half it has to be said. Cox and Paynter looked handy again upfront.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33893
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #184 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 23:43:49 » |
|
I did think at first it was Pook going off, but he was going towards the touch line too quick for it to be a sub.
Plus it had to be McNamee, dont think we'll ever get a full 90 out of him. On what basis? I think he's looked fitter every game (ooh errr) blah blah blah, the company I work for having links with Watford blah blah blah. His asthma is very bad, apparently so bad that 90 minutes of football would pretty much leave him close for dead! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Colin Todd
Offline
Posts: 3318
|
|
« Reply #185 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 23:44:46 » |
|
what? blah blah blah
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
axs
naaarrrrrppppp
Offline
Posts: 13469
|
|
« Reply #186 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 23:50:37 » |
|
mcnamee was awesome - had their left back scared shitless - and then roberts came on and ran him ragged and stuck it past the keeper.
really enjoyed tonight other than the first 3 minutes.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33893
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #187 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 23:52:32 » |
|
their right back probably!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
axs
naaarrrrrppppp
Offline
Posts: 13469
|
|
« Reply #188 on: Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 23:53:35 » |
|
ok- point conceded!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
axs
naaarrrrrppppp
Offline
Posts: 13469
|
|
« Reply #189 on: Wednesday, February 13, 2008, 00:16:55 » |
|
3-0. Cox double and Corr penalty. good shout sir, at least the score and one of the scorers. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36336
|
|
« Reply #190 on: Wednesday, February 13, 2008, 00:24:52 » |
|
Hmm when was McNamee subbed? 80 mins? I'm not convinced, I reckon he'll play a full 90 by the end of the season.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
normy
Offline
Posts: 991
|
|
« Reply #191 on: Wednesday, February 13, 2008, 08:13:14 » |
|
On the night, McNamee showed everything a good winger should. Good first touch, quick feet and speed, hardly ever got robbed of the ball, and got in many dangerous crosses, one of which Paynter headed home. Always in the game. If he keeps it up, a gem. Zaboob please note the above.
Pook did very well, even his passing was generally very good, besides ball winning.
Those two, plus the good combination of Paynter and Cox, were the reasons we won IMO, the rest were not very impressive except for the Robers cameo at the end.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ust be the oldest
|
|
|
|
neville w
|
|
« Reply #192 on: Wednesday, February 13, 2008, 08:20:20 » |
|
I thought the ref had a good game, although it wasn't the most difficult to take charge of.
Quite a few of our players seemed knackered in the last 20 minutes, and Ifil didn't look his most dominant self.
Apart form the first 5 minutes, a good overall performance and comfortable win, should set up our confidence for Saturday, but without Cox it will be tougher - Sturrock to start ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 16123
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #193 on: Wednesday, February 13, 2008, 08:39:32 » |
|
I thought the ref had a good game, although it wasn't the most difficult to take charge of.
Quite a few of our players seemed knackered in the last 20 minutes, and Ifil didn't look his most dominant self.
Apart form the first 5 minutes, a good overall performance and comfortable win, should set up our confidence for Saturday, but without Cox it will be tougher - Sturrock to start ? Sturrock and Paynter I should imagine. The only other option would be to perhaps play Roberts in a free role behind Paynter? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Luci
Offline
Posts: 10862
Fatbury's Stalker
|
|
« Reply #194 on: Wednesday, February 13, 2008, 08:46:19 » |
|
There weren't any bookings tonight either were there? Even better. Oh and after actually being awake long enough to see soccer night, I did find Paynter and Hasneys celebration after his goal amusing. I couldn't see properly from the TE however part of me thinks thats not a bad thing judging by his underpants!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
