Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: zaaboub's red  (Read 9098 times)
Hmonkey

« Reply #15 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 18:18:05 »

it was a stupid attempt at a foul by zaaboub which probably deserved a booking for intent but no way a red card.

styles lost the plot in the second half
Logged
Spud

« Reply #16 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 18:42:07 »

He did lunge but he was nowhere near the man, a booking would have sufficed.
Logged
STFC_Chris
Charlie Croker

Offline Offline

Posts: 1472





Ignore
« Reply #17 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 18:44:10 »

Quote from: "lebowski"
maybe this will be the lesson for sofi that he should pass it earlier, and not get caught on the ball.

Good point, there was two or three occasions where he could have layed it off to Cox but instead he tried to take on their entire team.  :x
Logged
santini

Offline Offline

Posts: 890




Ignore
« Reply #18 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 18:49:40 »

Another childish lunge just because he lost the ball. He has no one to blame but himself.
Logged
DiV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 32123


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #19 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 18:51:09 »

Quote from: "santini"
Another childish lunge just because he lost the ball. He has no one to blame but himself.


but a red card though, pull the other one.

On another note, is Nicho injured? or just out of favour?
Logged
DMR

« Reply #20 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 18:57:50 »

I can understand why it was given. I don't think it deserved a red card because he missed, but Zaboub can be a petulant little fucker - if he makes contact there it's a leg-breaker and therefore a red card is fair enough
Logged
reeves4england

Offline Offline

Posts: 15973


We'll never die!




Ignore
« Reply #21 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 18:59:26 »

Quote from: "DV"
Quote from: "santini"
Another childish lunge just because he lost the ball. He has no one to blame but himself.


but a red card though, pull the other one.

On another note, is Nicho injured? or just out of favour?
Judging by the post-match interview both Nicholas and Blackburn have been injured but will be back very soon
Logged
DiV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 32123


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #22 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 18:59:29 »

it wasnt even close to being a leg breaker?! he was sliding on the floor for starters. It wasnt above the ball.
Logged
DMR

« Reply #23 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 19:02:31 »

He let the deck Dan and by the letter of the law you can be sent off for that- I'm not going to have a row with you over it, harsh red I agree, I do however understand why Styles gave it. In a funny way it also calmed a potential ruck - quick card, no brawl - as opposed to a yellow and a huge riot.

It was a daft tackle. Not malicious but he needs to learn not to be so stupid.
Logged
sonic youth

« Reply #24 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 19:10:37 »

i don't understand what this "intent" offence is - he went for the ball, is that illegal?

it didn't look as though he went in over the height of the ball and although it was a stupid challenge, it was his first tackle and a straight red was fucking absurd.
Logged
reeves4england

Offline Offline

Posts: 15973


We'll never die!




Ignore
« Reply #25 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 19:12:05 »

Quote from: "sonic youth"
i don't understand what this "intent" offence is - he went for the ball, is that illegal?

it didn't look as though he went in over the height of the ball and although it was a stupid challenge, it was his first tackle and a straight red was fucking absurd.
Ok Sonic...

By intent, they mean malicious intent. So he would have to have been trying to actually harm the guy for it to be a straight red
Logged
Hmonkey

« Reply #26 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 19:12:29 »

Quote from: "sonic youth"
i don't understand what this "intent" offence is - he went for the ball, is that illegal?

it didn't look as though he went in over the height of the ball and although it was a stupid challenge, it was his first tackle and a straight red was fucking absurd.


but he didn't go for the ball he went for the man


and the useless twat didn't get anywhere near him
Logged
sonic youth

« Reply #27 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 19:13:27 »

he went to win the ball, there was hardly any contact with the man!

so how the fuck do you use intent as justification?
Logged
Hmonkey

« Reply #28 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 19:16:27 »

how did he go to win the ball? the rovers player was running away from zaaboub and he lunged to try and catch his legs.

it was a stupid pointless attempt at a foul which he deserved a booking for but styles had lost it and gave him a red to even things up.
Logged
Bennett
No Comment

Offline Offline

Posts: 9501





Ignore
« Reply #29 on: Saturday, November 24, 2007, 19:16:51 »

from the TE it seemed like a late lunge really, nothing else.

i intend to find phillips mum and make him watch etc
Logged

This is the water.
And this is the well.
Drink full and descend.
The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Up
Print
Jump to: