Bushey Boy
 Offline
Posts: 8351
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: Thursday, November 8, 2007, 21:40:31 » |
|
Rocks not stones
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mexicano Rojo
Offline
Posts: 11953
Demasiado no es demasiado
|
|
« Reply #31 on: Thursday, November 8, 2007, 21:42:51 » |
|
ok and those cunts strood and spencer white are getting a kicking. we can peg them to the floor and get the disabled fans to run over them.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bushey Boy
Offline
Posts: 8351
|
|
« Reply #32 on: Thursday, November 8, 2007, 21:48:29 » |
|
Si Pi isnt coming in the ground either or his miserable brother
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mexicano Rojo
Offline
Posts: 11953
Demasiado no es demasiado
|
|
« Reply #33 on: Thursday, November 8, 2007, 21:50:37 » |
|
we would make a great board.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Kinky Tom
Snow Master Sandwich King.
 Online
Posts: 9049
|
|
« Reply #34 on: Thursday, November 8, 2007, 21:51:06 » |
|
Fucking hell a sniff of power and you turn into a pair of megalomaniacs - you're driving a bigger wedge between the club and the fans than Diamandis could even dream of, you should be ashamed...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mexicano Rojo
Offline
Posts: 11953
Demasiado no es demasiado
|
|
« Reply #35 on: Thursday, November 8, 2007, 21:52:09 » |
|
tom can come in but his dad can fuck off
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Kinky Tom
Snow Master Sandwich King.
Online
Posts: 9049
|
|
« Reply #36 on: Thursday, November 8, 2007, 21:53:31 » |
|
Now that I can agree with.  You're ok for that lift by the way. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mexicano Rojo
Offline
Posts: 11953
Demasiado no es demasiado
|
|
« Reply #37 on: Thursday, November 8, 2007, 21:54:16 » |
|
ace cheers
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #38 on: Thursday, November 8, 2007, 22:10:58 » |
|
That episode nearly put me off the Trust, as it ws obvious that Tory Boy has no real interest in the club other than as a means to progress his political career.
I think you are being a touch unfair on Justin, but you make a valid point about the relatively small voter base at the time (which also effects the potential pool for people to put themselves forward as candidates for what is a difficult and very public position). Looking back we (The Trust board) were guilty of pushing the issue of a fan on the board to soon. In our defence though, that was the clubs first AGM for some time and there was a fear at the time that if we didnt try then, we would maybe have a long wait for another chance. Think what you like mate, but I've spent enough years dabbling in the murky waters of local politics, to recognise someone trying to use all available outlets to further their own agenda.....its not illegal or owt, and a game anyone is free to play, but it wasn't exactly something that covered the Trust in glory. It was probably the only time at an AGM when I've cast my vote alongside the Wills block vote in turning down the Trust rep, being elected to the Board. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
|
« Reply #39 on: Thursday, November 8, 2007, 22:31:29 » |
|
I think a fan rep should be in a non-exec capacity and really just be there to oversee the performance of the Board and the integrity of how the club is run. Obviously they can be there to liase with fans but I think a place(s) on the board should really be to provide assurance to the fans that the club is running the club correctly and according to its goals.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #40 on: Thursday, November 8, 2007, 22:37:17 » |
|
I think a fan rep should be in a non-exec capacity and really just be there to oversee the performance of the Board and the integrity of how the club is run. Obviously they can be there to liase with fans but I think a place(s) on the board should really be to provide assurance to the fans that the club is running the club correctly and according to its goals. Quite right.....and for that reason it should be someone who is seen to be above corruption..... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Kinky Tom
Snow Master Sandwich King.
Online
Posts: 9049
|
|
« Reply #41 on: Thursday, November 8, 2007, 22:38:25 » |
|
I think a fan rep should be in a non-exec capacity and really just be there to oversee the performance of the Board and the integrity of how the club is run. Obviously they can be there to liase with fans but I think a place(s) on the board should really be to provide assurance to the fans that the club is running the club correctly and according to its goals. Quite right.....and for that reason it should be someone who is seen to be above corruption.....f So someone really simple, now where did Toni go? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #42 on: Thursday, November 8, 2007, 22:42:36 » |
|
I think a fan rep should be in a non-exec capacity and really just be there to oversee the performance of the Board and the integrity of how the club is run. Obviously they can be there to liase with fans but I think a place(s) on the board should really be to provide assurance to the fans that the club is running the club correctly and according to its goals. Quite right.....and for that reason it should be someone who is seen to be above corruption.....f So someone really simple, now where did Toni go? Think he went from Fiorentina to Bayern.....personally I wouldn't favour an Eyetie when it came to anti corruption. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 16121
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #43 on: Thursday, November 8, 2007, 22:46:50 » |
|
I think the fan on the board idea can work, but only in the context of that person being an experienced businessman wh ogenuinely knows what they are doing. Otherwise it seems like a pointless novelty
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
|
« Reply #44 on: Thursday, November 8, 2007, 22:53:51 » |
|
We all know that I'm the only realistic choice.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
