flammableBen
|
 |
« Reply #75 on: Monday, September 24, 2007, 03:11:42 » |
|
Eh? is Cox that good? Like on the level of former loanees Carrick and Milner? Or are you just being silly.
I don't know I haven't seen him play. But he doesn't sound like anything special.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
 |
« Reply #76 on: Monday, September 24, 2007, 08:09:03 » |
|
he's insane.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Colin Todd
Offline
Posts: 3318
|
 |
« Reply #77 on: Monday, September 24, 2007, 09:44:24 » |
|
Not convinced about the whole playing for England thing He's not as good as he thinks he is, although in some ways its a good thing as he will try things that more mentally fragile young strikers might not. Showing signs of a good partnership with Billy, long may it continue
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Luci
Offline
Posts: 10862
Fatbury's Stalker
|
 |
« Reply #78 on: Monday, September 24, 2007, 09:45:41 » |
|
I think Cox is a very good player with a lot of potential. I'm pretty sure we will see him playing 1st team for Reading - not in the Prem though as they're going down this year of course 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 34130
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #79 on: Saturday, October 6, 2007, 17:51:07 » |
|
See the problem is, he's had one very good game and you're singing his praises (and rightly).
If he plays shit for the remaining time here, you'll look like a complete cunt too. suck my balls....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lash_sumthin
Offline
Posts: 466
|
 |
« Reply #80 on: Saturday, October 6, 2007, 17:52:08 » |
|
soapy tit wank his movement off the ball is first class
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
lebowski
|
 |
« Reply #81 on: Saturday, October 6, 2007, 17:54:03 » |
|
his confidence is justified, in my opinion. his contract at reading expires at the end of this season too...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 34130
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #82 on: Saturday, October 6, 2007, 17:55:04 » |
|
I'm going to put £100 quid on him being the top scorer in the Championship next season 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Red81
Offline
Posts: 1836
|
 |
« Reply #83 on: Saturday, October 6, 2007, 17:57:14 » |
|
I take back my initial opinion of him. Impressed me no end today.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Victory is sweet even deep in the cheap seats
|
|
|
Run_the_bath
|
 |
« Reply #84 on: Saturday, October 6, 2007, 17:58:34 » |
|
shame hes only on loan, cox paynter and corr. what a strikeforce that would be. hopefully by christmas the board room shambles will be sorted and we will be able to sign cox permanently. hes one hell of a prospect.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lash_sumthin
Offline
Posts: 466
|
 |
« Reply #85 on: Saturday, October 6, 2007, 17:59:14 » |
|
doubt we could afford him
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Run_the_bath
|
 |
« Reply #86 on: Saturday, October 6, 2007, 18:01:50 » |
|
how much u reckon he'd cost?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC_Gazzza
|
 |
« Reply #87 on: Saturday, October 6, 2007, 18:03:05 » |
|
Anything more than a quid and we cant afford him
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 34130
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #88 on: Saturday, October 6, 2007, 18:03:39 » |
|
at a totally random guess....it would depend on whether they offered him a new contract or not....if they didnt probably about 500k as he could go for a nominal fee or a free in the summer.
If Reading offering him a new 2 year contract then it would have to be about 2 million for them to listen to an offer.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Run_the_bath
|
 |
« Reply #89 on: Saturday, October 6, 2007, 18:05:27 » |
|
hopefully by christmas the board room shambles will be sorted and we will be able to sign cox permanently. hes one hell of a prospect. not even with a new board in place?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|