Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
 Offline
Posts: 15863
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Tuesday, July 3, 2007, 12:21:18 » |
|
as i have said i am open minded. if serious investment is there then i will be coming to games next season whether or not Mike D or SSW or whoever is still here. i am here to support my team however i do worry that we could find ourselves in this situation again if some remain
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC Bart
Offline
Posts: 1114
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday, July 3, 2007, 12:22:48 » |
|
Wills and Diamandis are part of the consortium -details on BBC website
Nothing has changed- the pressure remains
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Colin Todd
Offline
Posts: 3318
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Tuesday, July 3, 2007, 12:24:14 » |
|
The BBC know fuck all, they just read the statement the same as the rest of us.
They state both SS Wills and James wills are on the board. This is bollocks
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Tuesday, July 3, 2007, 12:24:15 » |
|
I hope all you lot jumping off the anti-board ship don't drown, if the weather gets bad you might not be allowed back on. I hope you can all swim.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Colin Todd
Offline
Posts: 3318
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Tuesday, July 3, 2007, 12:41:37 » |
|
Who's jumping off the anti board ship? I think people are entitled to fell at least cautiously optimistic about the situation especially as the statement indicates the current board will be replaced if this goes through. Personally, the reason I'm cautiously optimistic is the thought of the current board fucking off and sturrock being given some cash to play with.
Its better than a winding up petition, and just for once has given me a little glimmer of hope to dream that the future of sTFC might be looking better.
*awaits dreams being shot to pieces in a few weeks*
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Tuesday, July 3, 2007, 12:45:24 » |
|
Umm.. I wasn't being entirely serious. Good for you though.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Tuesday, July 3, 2007, 12:46:40 » |
|
Ben's just sad because some of his drinking buddies might actually go to games instead of staying in the pub  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Colin Todd
Offline
Posts: 3318
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Tuesday, July 3, 2007, 12:48:42 » |
|
Umm.. I wasn't being entirely serious. Good for you though. Thanks, I feel better already :thumbs: |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Tuesday, July 3, 2007, 12:48:52 » |
|
I'm fed up of all these posts saying the same things over and over again. I'm trying to derail these threads into madness.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Tuesday, July 3, 2007, 12:49:46 » |
|
I'm fed up of all these posts saying the same things over and over again. I'm trying to derail these threads into madness. You buzybody |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Colin Todd
Offline
Posts: 3318
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Tuesday, July 3, 2007, 12:50:29 » |
|
Who's jumping off the anti board ship? I think people are entitled to fell at least cautiously optimistic about the situation especially as the statement indicates the current board will be replaced if this goes through. Personally, the reason I'm cautiously optimistic is the thought of the current board fucking off and sturrock being given some cash to play with. Its better than a winding up petition, and just for once has given me a little glimmer of hope to dream that the future of sTFC might be looking better. *awaits dreams being shot to pieces in a few weeks*  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Tuesday, July 3, 2007, 12:55:53 » |
|
Get off my ship you cunt.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
redbullzeye
Offline
Posts: 1319
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Tuesday, July 3, 2007, 12:57:23 » |
|
Just wondering, if this take over or whatever it is pulls off and we are left with what looks like a promising situation, will you support the board? Will you still be watching the club? I know a few have boycotted home games, but if this all does come off it could really leave us in a situation where we'll be challenging for promotion to the Championship, especially with a manager like Sturrock.
I'm still sceptical and I know we've had false dawns before but I do think it will be excellent for the club. I get the drift of your thread and I can't see many people not supporting the team because of who is in charge at board level. However, I am anti-board because of the way they have handled things over the last god know how many years. If you are have a track record of business failure, contempt for customer expectations, contempt for the Inland Revenue/SBC and a reputation for bloody minded arrogance, you aren't going to change just because you've been lucky enough to attract some more dough. We all deserve better |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Phil_S
Offline
Posts: 1534
Who changed my Avatar ?!
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Tuesday, July 3, 2007, 13:11:08 » |
|
Just wondering, if this take over or whatever it is pulls off and we are left with what looks like a promising situation, will you support the board? Will you still be watching the club? I know a few have boycotted home games, but if this all does come off it could really leave us in a situation where we'll be challenging for promotion to the Championship, especially with a manager like Sturrock.
I'm still sceptical and I know we've had false dawns before but I do think it will be excellent for the club. I get the drift of your thread and I can't see many people not supporting the team because of who is in charge at board level. However, I am anti-board because of the way they have handled things over the last god know how many years. If you are have a track record of business failure, contempt for customer expectations, contempt for the Inland Revenue/SBC and a reputation for bloody minded arrogance, you aren't going to change just because you've been lucky enough to attract some more dough. We all deserve better :goodpost: I supported the team last season, & intend to next. However I will never, ever support the Wills family, Diamandis, Carson, Holt, Gray et al. They have crossed the Rubicon as far as I am concerned. They DO NOT have the best interest of the club at haert and are only looking to make money from some mega ground deal. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
From the Dark Side
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Tuesday, July 3, 2007, 13:17:52 » |
|
They've crossed the Rubicon on a giant Rubik's Cube as far as I'm concerned. Maybe on some sort of tightrope. But they are still on the tightrope. and the Rubik's cube is a horrible mess. It has 10 blue squares and only 8 reds. You ain't never going to complete that. The whole thing is a disaster.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
