CLUB STATEMENT

[Samdy Gray]

Wonder if they bothered to ask Mike if he minded personal and private communications being displayed in public like that too - surely that's a breach of the Data Protection Act?

Yep.

Principle 6 to be precise

Code:

6. Personal data shall be processed in accordance with the rights of data subjects under this Act.

[ronnie21]

My highlight:

Code:

Mike Wilks made the following comments in the press, as reported on Saturday 13th January: "Swindon fans want a club that is actually in Swindon and not relocated to junction 17 at Chippenham." As has been clarified on numerous occasions previously, the Club is committed to the redevelopment of The County Ground, and sees this as the ideal scenario for both the club and the town. For Mr Wilks to insinuate otherwise is both misleading and disruptive.

Was it not Diamandis that said if he had a choice between the club dying and moving to J17, he'd move to J17. So how are Mike Wilks comments "misleading and disruptive" when all he's doing is quoting the club's "general manager"?

One of many contradictions - but that was my favourite.

Amazing stuff.

Wonder if they bothered to ask Mike if he minded personal and private communications being displayed in public like that too - surely that's a breach of the Data Protection Act?

And reiterated by Mike Bowden at the meeting on Saturday! :twisted:  :twisted:

[Samdy Gray]

I'd also suggest Breach of Condifentiality as well. Although I'm sure Mike will be taking it up with his legal representatives as he rightly should.

[Panda Paws]

Wonder if they bothered to ask Mike if he minded personal and private communications being displayed in public like that too - surely that's a breach of the Data Protection Act?

Yep.

Principle 6 to be precise

Code:

6. Personal data shall be processed in accordance with the rights of data subjects under this Act.

Thanks Sam - I thought I was right. Well - who fancies emailing the Information Commissioner then?

[sonic youth]

I'm fucking fuming. Am I alone here?

I simply cannot comprehend any of this, so many contradictions it makes my head fucking spin.

[Luci]

I'm fucking fuming. Am I alone here?

I simply cannot comprehend any of this, so many contradictions it makes my head fucking spin.

No you're not mate.

The worst thing is that there is fuck all we can do.

[Samdy Gray]

Wonder if they bothered to ask Mike if he minded personal and private communications being displayed in public like that too - surely that's a breach of the Data Protection Act?

Yep.

Principle 6 to be precise

Code:

6. Personal data shall be processed in accordance with the rights of data subjects under this Act.

Thanks Sam - I thought I was right. Well - who fancies emailing the Information Commissioner then?

My useless knowledge of the Data Protection Act comes into use! Does help being a Data Protection Co-Ordinator at work though   .

You'd be better off getting straight on the blower really. The IC can sometimes take a while to respond to emails.

[glos_robin]

I am fuming also, I can't beleive that some people on thisis have swallowed this shit. Every word of that statement makes you want to punch something

[bigbobjoylove]

I'm fucking fuming. Am I alone here?

I simply cannot comprehend any of this, so many contradictions it makes my head fucking spin.

Same. I can't quite believe what I've just read.

[Rich Pullen]

I'm fucking fuming. Am I alone here?

I simply cannot comprehend any of this, so many contradictions it makes my head fucking spin.

Likewise.

[redbullzeye]

Now we know why Bowden was at the Trust meeting.  The Board statement changes nothing but it gives the Consortium the chance to get stuck in and prove to the undecided that they are the way forward.  Sad it's going to get nasty but these guys aren't going to go without a fight.  I still can't work out why Mr D won't shove off - are the property development chances so great that he can't lose the chance of reaping the rewards OR is there something nasty lurking in the unreleased accounts that prompt him to do anything to prevent them becoming public?

[Barry Scott]

Wonder if they bothered to ask Mike if he minded personal and private communications being displayed in public like that too - surely that's a breach of the Data Protection Act?

Yep.

Principle 6 to be precise

Code:

6. Personal data shall be processed in accordance with the rights of data subjects under this Act.

I haven't actually read the article as i cannot be fucked. But, as i love being pedantic, i very much doubt that any personal data is within that email.

You'd have to be a complete cock to send personal details in an email to a football club.

Anyway, just to be a cock, that email would not form part of either personal data or sensitive data. The manner in which that information was both obtained and intended means nothing is or can be breached off the back of it. It's just out of order to make it public.

[Fred Elliot]

I'm fucking fuming. Am I alone here?

I simply cannot comprehend any of this, so many contradictions it makes my head fucking spin.

No mate

I am flabberghasted that they are making Luggy attend just hours before KO

[Give us an S]

Starnes, Wills, Diamandis, holt, Carson, Gray, Bowden, one thing.....just leave. Just go. Nobody wants you and your lies any bloody more. I'd rather have Joey Beauchamp round for tea than any of you lot. Fuck off

I think this perfectly sums up the hatred for the board right now.

[STFC_Gazza]

Whilst I can see some people are annoyed, you should still get behind the team, thats why we all support the club to see it doing well on the pitch. Boycotting games etc would have a detrimental effect on the players etc on the pitch.