pumbaa
Ha, no cunt in my title anymore. Oh.....
 Offline
Posts: 6351
Fartmeister
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Monday, January 15, 2007, 13:56:59 » |
|
Sorry to be so flippant, but shouldn't the title of this thread read 'Win fatbury's wank rag'   sorted  Top man Gazza  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
herthab
TEF Travel
Offline
Posts: 12020
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Monday, January 15, 2007, 14:02:45 » |
|
Sorry to be so flippant, but shouldn't the title of this thread read 'Win fatbury's wank rag' sorted Top man Gazza It should be 'fatburys'. Fatbury's is a shortening of fatbury is and would therefore read 'Win fatbury is wank rag', which doesn't make any sense. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It's All Good..............
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Monday, January 15, 2007, 14:04:33 » |
|
SO who won the shirt? I didnt! :|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Monday, January 15, 2007, 14:36:24 » |
|
Sorry to be so flippant, but shouldn't the title of this thread read 'Win fatbury's wank rag' sorted Top man Gazza It should be 'fatburys'. Fatbury's is a shortening of fatbury is and would therefore read 'Win fatbury is wank rag', which doesn't make any sense. Aren't apostraphies used for possesion as well as shortening? in which case fatbury's would be correct? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
herthab
TEF Travel
Offline
Posts: 12020
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Monday, January 15, 2007, 14:53:31 » |
|
Sorry to be so flippant, but shouldn't the title of this thread read 'Win fatbury's wank rag' sorted Top man Gazza It should be 'fatburys'. Fatbury's is a shortening of fatbury is and would therefore read 'Win fatbury is wank rag', which doesn't make any sense. Aren't apostraphies used for possesion as well as shortening? in which case fatbury's would be correct? If using an apostrophe for posession, the correct grammer would be at the end, eg: 'fatburys' wank rag. Its use before the s is incorrect in the usage. I am right. You are wrong. I am brilliant. You are not. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It's All Good..............
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Monday, January 15, 2007, 14:56:27 » |
|
Surely it would only be fatburys' wank rag if we were talking about fatburys in the plural. However we are not, as there is clearly only one fatbury. Therefore I stand by fatbury's wank rag being correct.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
herthab
TEF Travel
Offline
Posts: 12020
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Monday, January 15, 2007, 14:58:05 » |
|
Don't fuck with me cunt!
I know what I'm talking about!
I got a GSCE (Level D) in English!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It's All Good..............
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Monday, January 15, 2007, 15:00:50 » |
|
Don't fuck with me cunt!
I know what I'm talking about!
I got a GSCE (Level D) in English! I got a C. C for Checkmate, and the crowd goes wild. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
herthab
TEF Travel
Offline
Posts: 12020
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Monday, January 15, 2007, 15:03:15 » |
|
Don't fuck with me cunt!
I know what I'm talking about!
I got a GSCE (Level D) in English! I got a C. C for Checkmate, and the crowd goes wild. Bastard! Beaten by a C....... If only I had handed in my coursework on time................ |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It's All Good..............
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
 Online
Posts: 14536
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Monday, January 15, 2007, 15:06:14 » |
|
Sorry to be so flippant, but shouldn't the title of this thread read 'Win fatbury's wank rag' sorted Top man Gazza It should be 'fatburys'. Fatbury's is a shortening of fatbury is and would therefore read 'Win fatbury is wank rag', which doesn't make any sense. I have reason to believe you are talking bollocks. 'Fatbury's wank mag' is fine gramatically (although clearly not in any other way. Anything which conjures up an image of Fatbury masturbating is clearly not fine) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
herthab
TEF Travel
Offline
Posts: 12020
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Monday, January 15, 2007, 15:26:53 » |
|
So it's pick on the special kid now is it?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It's All Good..............
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Monday, January 15, 2007, 15:38:11 » |
|
I got a degree in English and as its owned by fatbury it should be Fatbury's wank rag!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
Offline
Posts: 12537
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Monday, January 15, 2007, 16:20:10 » |
|
so you admit it then fatters?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Monday, January 15, 2007, 19:47:56 » |
|
damn fell for it!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bushey Boy
Offline
Posts: 8351
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Monday, January 15, 2007, 21:10:18 » |
|
old fatters gets bullied on here
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
