STFC Village
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Thursday, January 11, 2007, 10:19:49 » |
|
It got moved from gen dis, millom 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
millom red
Offline
Posts: 1588
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: Thursday, January 11, 2007, 16:03:56 » |
|
Fair enough! 
|
|
|
Logged
|
f it dont need fixing....dont fuckin break it
Await The Day
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: Friday, January 12, 2007, 00:47:06 » |
|
yeah you cunt.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36347
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: Friday, January 12, 2007, 02:05:39 » |
|
No doubt Diamond Mike has made us a good return on this sale, he is highly skilled at this remember.
Keep the faith people.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
millom red
Offline
Posts: 1588
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: Friday, January 12, 2007, 09:55:44 » |
|
SSSSSSSHHHhHHHHH!!! Youve let the cat out the bag now si-pie!!!
:twisted:
|
|
|
Logged
|
f it dont need fixing....dont fuckin break it
Await The Day
|
|
|
Sippo
Living in the 80s
Offline
Posts: 15626
I ain't gettin on no plane fool
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: Thursday, January 18, 2007, 13:39:48 » |
|
Why did the board not put the 'He can't play against his old club' clause in the contract. Hartlepool are promotion rivals!! :evil:
|
|
|
Logged
|
If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: Thursday, January 18, 2007, 13:57:01 » |
|
Why did the board not put the 'He can't play against his old club' clause in the contract. Hartlepool are promotion rivals!! :evil: Because we're not cowardly, that clause was relatively rare but Bristol City slap it on most of their deals - if we think he's not good enough for STFC then let him play... You fear sods law, if he scores against us, he scores against us. So be it. The way Hartlepool are playing we'll struggle anyway!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: Thursday, January 18, 2007, 14:03:45 » |
|
We'll beat Hartlepool, our record against the top sides is very good.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Scot Munroe
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: Thursday, January 18, 2007, 14:05:48 » |
|
We'll beat Hartlepool, our record against the top sides is very good. it is. We have only lost to lincoln. Out of the top sides. But monkhouse has not lost a game he has played in this season. 22 games.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
land_of_bo
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: Thursday, January 18, 2007, 14:08:04 » |
|
We'll beat Hartlepool, our record against the top sides is very good. it is. We have only lost to lincoln. Out of the top sides. But monkhouse has not lost a game he has played in this season. 22 games. Odds on draw then, ain't it?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Scot Munroe
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: Thursday, January 18, 2007, 14:09:07 » |
|
We'll beat Hartlepool, our record against the top sides is very good. it is. We have only lost to lincoln. Out of the top sides. But monkhouse has not lost a game he has played in this season. 22 games. Odds on draw then, ain't it? yes.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sippo
Living in the 80s
Offline
Posts: 15626
I ain't gettin on no plane fool
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: Thursday, January 18, 2007, 14:44:17 » |
|
Any team wants to play a weakened side. I beleive that without Monkhouse, they are weaker.
|
|
|
Logged
|
If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
|
|
|
fatbury
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: Thursday, January 18, 2007, 15:10:32 » |
|
Ridiculous not to put the cant play against us clause in there ... who negotiates transfer?? hasnt got a bloody clue whoever it is! Thats just basic !
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: Thursday, January 18, 2007, 15:16:48 » |
|
Ridiculous not to put the cant play against us clause in there ... who negotiates transfer?? hasnt got a bloody clue whoever it is! Thats just basic ! Back-in-the-day we didn't have these clauses (and that wasn't that long ago) - It shows fear and Sturrock isn't that kind of manager. He will tell Zaaboub to go out and show why he's been brought in to replace Monky and will hopefully make him look totally inferior. It's done now so there's no point bemoaning it. He's due an injury anyway 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: Thursday, January 18, 2007, 15:56:21 » |
|
yeah but I seem to remember Sturrock himself saying he expected that clause to be included
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|