|
sonic youth
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Friday, December 22, 2006, 14:13:04 » |
|
cheers. would you care to keep us informed as to your stance on the redevelopment as discussions develop? it'd be great to get both sides thoughts on the matter without the adver confusing it all.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nuddy
 Offline
Posts: 21
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Friday, December 22, 2006, 14:46:48 » |
|
You do not like Houses in Multi Occupation. Even when its helping people who are from the local community I know this is off subject, but yes we are opposed to hmos. A quick history lesson! Throughout the late nineties the Broadgreen area went into decline houses were cheap and were often bought up to be turned into hmos . Very often they were poorly maintained, the area was also being turned into a general rubbish tip and the Council also failed to do their bit. The balance between families and single people living here changed and it became a vicious circle as the more rundown the area became the less families wanted to live here and more himos appeared etc. In 2000 prostitution exploded across the whole area and at that point we had to fight back and we have been ever since. While I understand single people need places to live, the hmo population tends to be transient and not care about the area in which they live. We do care and are trying desperately and succeeding in bringing the area up, we believe the area is at saturation point as far as hmos are concerned so unfortunately will continue to oppose new ones, sorry mate it's not personal. So do you live in the Broadgreen area? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bushey Boy
Offline
Posts: 8351
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Friday, December 22, 2006, 14:54:08 » |
|
I totally agree with what your saying, its nothing personal but some of the comments made in the central outlook have angered me in the past. Maybe its the jounalism however some facts were ignored with direct reports. As this is a football forum I dont really want to go off field too much and enter into a political discussion.
In answer, I do not live in Broadgreen however do have flats, houses (families are in these) and HMO's in the area.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nuddy
Offline
Posts: 21
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Friday, December 22, 2006, 14:54:31 » |
|
cheers. would you care to keep us informed as to your stance on the redevelopment as discussions develop? it'd be great to get both sides thoughts on the matter without the adver confusing it all. Yes, no problems. Keeping communications open is the best way for all involved parties, shame the club have different ideas on that score! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SwindonTartanArmy
Go Team GB!
Offline
Posts: 2917
London Scottish - More History than Franchise!
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Friday, December 22, 2006, 14:59:56 » |
|
cheers. would you care to keep us informed as to your stance on the redevelopment as discussions develop? it'd be great to get both sides thoughts on the matter without the adver confusing it all. Yes, no problems. Keeping communications open is the best way for all involved parties, shame the club have different ideas on that score! You sound like you are surprised! :roll: |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Vi er best i verden! Vi er best i verden! Vi har slått England 2-1 i fotball!! Det er aldeles utrolig! Vi har slått England! England, kjempers fødeland. Lord Nelson, Lord Beaverbrook, Sir Winston Churchill, Sir Anthony Eden, Clement Attlee, Henry Cooper, Lady Diana--vi har slått dem alle sammen. Vi har slått dem alle sammen. Maggie Thatcher can you hear me?
Your boys took a hell of a beating!"
|
|
|
nuddy
Offline
Posts: 21
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Friday, December 22, 2006, 15:11:20 » |
|
cheers. would you care to keep us informed as to your stance on the redevelopment as discussions develop? it'd be great to get both sides thoughts on the matter without the adver confusing it all. Yes, no problems. Keeping communications open is the best way for all involved parties, shame the club have different ideas on that score! You sound like you are surprised! :roll:  In recent years nothing surprises me with the jokers that run the club. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Friday, December 22, 2006, 15:35:10 » |
|
Steady nuddy, the club will release an official statement criticising the local residents if you continue to post such inflammatory posts!!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33879
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Friday, December 22, 2006, 15:55:31 » |
|
Hmm, I thought the plans specifically detailed no loss of green space anyway....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Friday, December 22, 2006, 18:18:17 » |
|
i bet the local residents dont even use the open space anyway :-))(
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cavpete
Offline
Posts: 394
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Friday, December 22, 2006, 18:41:13 » |
|
i bet the local residents dont even use the open space anyway :-))( they do to let there dogs shit all over it Bet they are only moaning due to the noise increase. Might put them of there shot when playing bowls. Hopefully get it sorted out. As it seems no one wants the county ground moved or re-developed. It will benefit everyone not just the club money, jobs and something for all to use.. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Friday, December 22, 2006, 18:45:09 » |
|
i bet the local residents dont even use the open space anyway :-))( they do to let there dogs shit all over it Bet they are only moaning due to the noise increase. Might put them of there shot when playing bowls. Hopefully get it sorted out. As it seems no one wants the county ground moved or re-developed. It will benefit everyone not just the club money, jobs and something for all to use.. yeah. i thought the whole point of the plans were too keep a space for all the dogs to shit on. i don't know what they are moaning about tbh. its not as if they can walk onto the cricket or bowls pitches is it? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27180
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Friday, December 22, 2006, 18:46:12 » |
|
i bet the local residents dont even use the open space anyway :-))( they do to let there dogs shit all over it Bet they are only moaning due to the noise increase. Might put them of there shot when playing bowls. Hopefully get it sorted out. As it seems no one wants the county ground moved or re-developed. It will benefit everyone not just the club money, jobs and something for all to use.. yeah. i thought the whole point of the plans were too keep a space for all the dogs to shit on. i don't know what they are moaning about tbh. its not as if they can walk onto the cricket or bowls pitches is it? Bowls Rink |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Friday, December 22, 2006, 18:47:02 » |
|
rink then  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Friday, December 22, 2006, 19:00:50 » |
|
Again off subject but does Broadgreen area consist of Manchester Rd,Salisbury st and thatort of area?I lived in that area for 4 years about 5 years ago and moved away because the area was getting worse and from what I see of it now its certainly not getting any better id say its more run down now than it was then.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
/
W56196272
|
|
|
cavpete
Offline
Posts: 394
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Friday, December 22, 2006, 19:05:15 » |
|
Again off subject but does Broadgreen area consist of Manchester Rd,Salisbury st and thatort of area?I lived in that area for 4 years about 5 years ago and moved away because the area was getting worse and from what I see of it now its certainly not getting any better id say its more run down now than it was then. whent past there today on the way home and it looks like a bomb site always has though. Never change looks like a penhill scagheads front garden. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
