Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: If Diamandis has been banned from running a company?  (Read 10350 times)
DiV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 32442


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #45 on: Wednesday, December 20, 2006, 21:50:12 »

Quote from: "Maverick"
DV85 ... what proof do you have of exactly who the other people are in the Consortium bid .. or why we were told that a bid had been submitted .. and then suddenly it hadn't been until now??


For starters the name Bill Power has been made public....we all know who is he, we all know he exists and we all know he's got money to invest.

Which is more than we've got from the 'other investors' who have only come to light recently since the fans consortium  :roll:

The way I understand it, is a bid was submitted, went to the lawyer and then was sent back? how can the lawyer acting on behalf of SSW send something back that hasnt been submitted?!
Logged
rockincockinrobin

« Reply #46 on: Wednesday, December 20, 2006, 21:50:47 »

Quote from: "Maverick"
Well well well ... the true colours show through .... this seems to be all about "getting Mike D" really doesn't it?

Now you guys decide to go for his wife as well.

If that is the kind of levels supporters of the Consortium will stoop to, then I for one hope that the Consortium either publicly disowns people who are prepared to make it that personal ....... or else it just demonstrates that we have it all to fear with the way they choose to do business.

Let's hope that the other potential investor has a better approach and wins the day.


Go and  :arsekisser: the board's arse's maverick, you obviously love them!!
Logged
Bennett
No Comment

Offline Offline

Posts: 9524





Ignore
« Reply #47 on: Wednesday, December 20, 2006, 21:51:40 »

Quote from: "rockincockinrobin"
Quote from: "Maverick"
Well well well ... the true colours show through .... this seems to be all about "getting Mike D" really doesn't it?

Now you guys decide to go for his wife as well.

If that is the kind of levels supporters of the Consortium will stoop to, then I for one hope that the Consortium either publicly disowns people who are prepared to make it that personal ....... or else it just demonstrates that we have it all to fear with the way they choose to do business.

Let's hope that the other potential investor has a better approach and wins the day.


i'm not sure that's the case but jesus he's hard work, instead of thinking about things it's far easier to ask many many many questions and then ignore the answers

Go and  :arsekisser: board's arse's maverick, you obviously love them!!
Logged

This is the water.
And this is the well.
Drink full and descend.
The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
Bushey Boy

Offline Offline

Posts: 8351





Ignore
« Reply #48 on: Wednesday, December 20, 2006, 21:52:48 »

I am in a business where you find out things about people before deciding what you want to believe, if there has been some dodgy things going on id rather know now so I can act against or for teh man.

Talk talk has provided certain things I needed but the rest I will find.  If he has nothing to hide why worry, for example I woudlnt be against anyone doing checks on me!
Logged

Maverick

Offline Offline

Posts: 444




Ignore
« Reply #49 on: Wednesday, December 20, 2006, 21:52:58 »

As much as it does to you Talk Talk ... we both have a common passion ... STFC .. we just have different views of how to move forward.

There it doesn't really need the insults to establish that does it?
Logged
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 11834




Ignore
« Reply #50 on: Wednesday, December 20, 2006, 21:53:00 »

such is the life of a politician.
Logged
TalkTalk

« Reply #51 on: Wednesday, December 20, 2006, 21:54:32 »

Quote from: "Maverick"
As much as it does to you Talk Talk ... we both have a common passion ... STFC .. we just have different views of how to move forward.

There it doesn't really need the insults to establish that does it?

No, but it certainly makes me feel a lot better.

I give up with you.
Logged
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 11834




Ignore
« Reply #52 on: Wednesday, December 20, 2006, 21:54:52 »

Quote from: "Maverick"
As much as it does to you Talk Talk ... we both have a common passion ... STFC .. we just have different views of how to move forward.

There it doesn't really need the insults to establish that does it?


 it does on here Cool

Seriously, you question everything I post, and everyone else, yet you seemingly take the clubs response as gospel.  If you want clear decisive answers to your Consortium fears then meet them.
Logged
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE

Offline Offline

Posts: 15736





Ignore
« Reply #53 on: Wednesday, December 20, 2006, 21:59:15 »

Quote from: "TalkTalk"
Quote from: "Maverick"
Now you guys decide to go for his wife as well.

Hey sonny, it is well known that people in business sometimes use their spouses for deflecting business interest attention away from themselves.

Bushey Boy asked the question and it's fair to supply information.

What the fuck has it got to do with you anyway, stirrer?


She is a hottie tho !!      :--
Logged
TalkTalk

« Reply #54 on: Wednesday, December 20, 2006, 21:59:51 »

Quote from: "Fred Elliot"
Quote from: "TalkTalk"
Quote from: "Maverick"
Now you guys decide to go for his wife as well.

Hey sonny, it is well known that people in business sometimes use their spouses for deflecting business interest attention away from themselves.

Bushey Boy asked the question and it's fair to supply information.

What the fuck has it got to do with you anyway, stirrer?


She is a hottie tho !!      :--

Pic?
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #55 on: Wednesday, December 20, 2006, 22:02:15 »

Quote from: "RobertT"
Quote from: "Maverick"
As much as it does to you Talk Talk ... we both have a common passion ... STFC .. we just have different views of how to move forward.

There it doesn't really need the insults to establish that does it?


 it does on here Cool

Seriously, you question everything I post, and everyone else, yet you seemingly take the clubs response as gospel.  If you want clear decisive answers to your Consortium fears then meet them.


 With all due respect Rob this fella has had an easy ride, from people trying to accommodate his "concerns", its now clear  he has a different agenda, so I wouldn't bother with further attempts at reason.
Logged
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE

Offline Offline

Posts: 15736





Ignore
« Reply #56 on: Wednesday, December 20, 2006, 22:03:19 »

ahem  Cool

Ask John  Cheesy
Logged
TalkTalk

« Reply #57 on: Wednesday, December 20, 2006, 22:05:09 »

Quote from: "Fred Elliot"
ahem  Cool

Ask John  Cheesy

Ok, will do. Did he have his camera phone with him?  Tongue
Logged
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE

Offline Offline

Posts: 15736





Ignore
« Reply #58 on: Wednesday, December 20, 2006, 22:06:28 »

My personal feeling was that a line was overstepped today with regard to J17.

I know it was said that it is a fall back plan,but knowing full well the club's relationship with SBC, it does not take a brain surgeon to realise that option 2 may well become option 1.

And certain people can't understand why fans are angry ?
Logged
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE

Offline Offline

Posts: 15736





Ignore
« Reply #59 on: Wednesday, December 20, 2006, 22:07:23 »

Quote from: "TalkTalk"
Quote from: "Fred Elliot"
ahem  Cool

Ask John  Cheesy

Ok, will do. Did he have his camera phone with him?  Tongue


They were banned from the AGM as it was a closed meeting.

But the image is imprinted on his retinas
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7   Go Up
Print
Jump to: