Sade
 Offline
Posts: 6427
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Tuesday, April 11, 2006, 12:37:51 » |
|
Your right, but it whats most people think at first isnt it ? Especially if they have children of their own. Nobody really looks into it enough.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
RED ARMY
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday, April 11, 2006, 12:47:19 » |
|
I think we should name all rapists Jeremy :|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Tuesday, April 11, 2006, 12:51:43 » |
|
Or we only name them if they have a funny or usual, or apt name i.e. Ray Pist, Arthur Cock, Peter File etc
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Tuesday, April 11, 2006, 12:53:49 » |
|
Or we only name them if they have a funny or usual, or apt name i.e. Ray Pist, Arthur Cock, Peter File etc  Kid. D. Fiddler |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Tuesday, April 11, 2006, 12:54:59 » |
|
Ivor Hardonwhenilookatkids.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sade
Offline
Posts: 6427
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Tuesday, April 11, 2006, 12:57:25 » |
|
Or we only name them if they have a funny or usual, or apt name i.e. Ray Pist, Arthur Cock, Peter File etc Kid. D. Fiddler Kim fiddler, lets not be sexist :? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
RED ARMY
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Tuesday, April 11, 2006, 13:08:23 » |
|
Fanny Fiddler's his wife.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57847
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Tuesday, April 11, 2006, 13:10:29 » |
|
The only thing that can be argued for naming accused rapists is that it encourages people who have not reported an attack by the same person to come forward. I can only guess what being actually raped does to your head in terms of not wanting to tell someone for fear of being labled an idiot for leading someone on/not believed .
That said I don't agree. Personally i think it is absolutle terrible that peoples lives are ruined because of false accusations. I don't think the accuser should be named unless found guilty of purjery (liying under oath in court). Women (and men) should not be put off reporting rape because there was not enough evidence to convict.
Anybody heard those annoing radio adverts, the ones that start off "getting laid, bonking, shagging..." and then go on to say "if you don't get a clear yes then the only word you can use is rape". Well sorry but that is bollocks. "Mrs Batch, do I have your full permission to penatrate you roughly from behind". Blood hell what turn on eh.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Tuesday, April 11, 2006, 13:22:00 » |
|
accused "Mrs Batch, do I have your full permission to penatrate you roughly from behind". Blood hell what turn on eh. Just wait til shes asleep mate. That way you dont have to ask, and wont have the fear of being prosecuted  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Tuesday, April 11, 2006, 13:39:36 » |
|
Whether meaning to or not, Sade has demonstrated exactly my point - you get accused, you are scum in most people's eyes. You are then found not guilty, yet your life is still in tatters As for this consent thing, it's bollocks. If they have the presence of mind to jump into bed with you drunk or not, that should be 'permission' enough. I hope. :? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Tuesday, April 11, 2006, 13:46:23 » |
|
The alcohol excuse is pathetic. Like I say how many blokes wake up in the morning seriously regretting it? They have no get out clause, it seems a few ladies maybe able to cry rape with the cps' approval.
I would draft an agreement for my mrs to sign pre-sex, but I'd never get her to sign it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Tuesday, April 11, 2006, 13:46:49 » |
|
Let's be honest if they can prove 110% that the bloke is innocent the woman should be charged for false allegations.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33911
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Tuesday, April 11, 2006, 16:30:34 » |
|
There is a major difference between being forced upon and being too drunk to remember what happened....
Its pathetic, if a drunken girl has sex and regrets it in the morning, its her own fault...firstly for getting so drunk she cant remember in the first place, and secondly for going back to the guys house/taking him back to her house.
So different, yet by the sounds of it, soon to be the same....
So if two drunk people have sex, does that mean they could both get the other one done for rape?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Tuesday, April 11, 2006, 16:35:16 » |
|
That new "if you dont get a yes it could be rape" bollocks really fucks me off.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Tuesday, April 11, 2006, 17:11:08 » |
|
There is a major difference between being forced upon and being too drunk to remember what happened....
Its pathetic, if a drunken girl has sex and regrets it in the morning, its her own fault...firstly for getting so drunk she cant remember in the first place, and secondly for going back to the guys house/taking him back to her house.
So different, yet by the sounds of it, soon to be the same....
So if two drunk people have sex, does that mean they could both get the other one done for rape? It's probably a different rule for us blokes. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
