Ben Wah Balls
Offline
Posts: 5972
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Saturday, April 1, 2006, 15:24:20 » |
|
I think teams should have to have a minumum number of English players in their sides even if it's just 3.
I don't really care whether Arsenal win or lose in the champions league but I thought the Juventus match was supposed to be a good game, I watched the highlights on eurosport and it was crap. Some shocking misses from both sides and it was boring. My housemates thought the same. They certainly aren't the best side to watch in this country.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: Saturday, April 1, 2006, 16:20:15 » |
|
I think teams should have to have a minumum number of English players in their sides even if it's just 3.
I don't really care whether Arsenal win or lose in the champions league but I thought the Juventus match was supposed to be a good game, I watched the highlights on eurosport and it was crap. Some shocking misses from both sides and it was boring. My housemates thought the same. They certainly aren't the best side to watch in this country. And who are?, Chelsea?. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bennett
No Comment
Offline
Posts: 9745
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: Saturday, April 1, 2006, 17:03:24 » |
|
bwb in another shocking day of pro chelsea posting. le saux's the best! of course he is, he's an old blue. chelsea are the best team to watch! that's what's coming next i'll wager. drogba is entitled to use his arm, he's got silly hair! mourinho is not insane, he's just very passionate! etc
|
|
|
Logged
|
This is the water. And this is the well. Drink full and descend. The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33908
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: Saturday, April 1, 2006, 17:19:19 » |
|
How many English players did Liverpool use in the final last year...2?
Are we going to disown them as well :roll:
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33908
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: Saturday, April 1, 2006, 17:20:01 » |
|
ps. Arsenal ARE the best team to watch in the Prem. When they get going they are ace
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: Saturday, April 1, 2006, 17:27:12 » |
|
ps. Arsenal ARE the best team to watch in the Prem. When they get going they are ace 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFCere
Offline
Posts: 717
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: Saturday, April 1, 2006, 18:49:18 » |
|
all i was saying is why should i care about arsenal in the champions league?
they ARE NOT an english team. they are multicultural and for that reason id rather they didnt suceed, id much rather see a team with british players play well.
|
|
|
Logged
|
ing on Sabin: "He's the new Thierry Henry"
Gazza on life in China: "I'm enjoying every day. I've tried everything: duck's head, chicken's head, chicken's feet and bats and hopefully, if I keep that up, I'll be flying."
'The first 90 minutes are the most important.' - Bobby Robson
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33908
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: Saturday, April 1, 2006, 18:56:22 » |
|
all i was saying is why should i care about arsenal in the champions league?
they ARE NOT an english team. they are multicultural and for that reason id rather they didnt suceed, id much rather see a team with british players play well. Did you say the same about Liverpool last season?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
oxford_fan
Offline
Posts: 6764
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: Saturday, April 1, 2006, 18:59:16 » |
|
they are multicultural and for that reason id rather they didnt suceed 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 16128
We'll never die!
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: Saturday, April 1, 2006, 19:03:10 » |
|
Racist!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: Saturday, April 1, 2006, 22:15:09 » |
|
ps. Arsenal ARE the best team to watch in the Prem. When they get going they are ace Hate them as much as you want but DV speaks the truth.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ben Wah Balls
Offline
Posts: 5972
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: Saturday, April 1, 2006, 23:53:59 » |
|
bwb in another shocking day of pro chelsea posting. le saux's the best! of course he is, he's an old blue. chelsea are the best team to watch! that's what's coming next i'll wager. drogba is entitled to use his arm, he's got silly hair! mourinho is not insane, he's just very passionate! etc What the fuck are you going on about, I don't particularly like le saux. If you read what I said I just said he was better than Shearer as a pundit which is not fucking difficult. Mourinho though is a legend, no doubt about that. Shame he's not interested in the England job. Spurs are a better team to watch by far than Arsenal and yeah Chelsea are too. Personally I also prefer to watch West Ham, Portsmouth, Liverpool, and to be honest most of the teams in the premiership. Makes me laugh all these gooners with their inferiority complex, Arsenal aren't that good, get over it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
oxford_fan
Offline
Posts: 6764
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: Sunday, April 2, 2006, 00:05:57 » |
|
get over it mate, at their peak they play the best stuff around
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dazzza
Offline
Posts: 8265
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: Sunday, April 2, 2006, 00:08:11 » |
|
I'd have to wager now that they've got rid of that pinball Viera they're not bad to oggle.
Saying that did anyone see Manchester Utd's 4 minutes of madness against Bolton tonight?
T'was not bad.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ben Wah Balls
Offline
Posts: 5972
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: Sunday, April 2, 2006, 00:12:26 » |
|
And when are they at their peak, about once every four years, if that was their peak against Juventus then it wasn't very impressive. Arsenal were the better side but Juventus were shockingly poor.
The truth is that most of the time Arsenal really aren't that good to watch.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|