Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Proof Jack Smith is shit...  (Read 7265 times)
Spud

« Reply #30 on: Monday, April 10, 2006, 16:41:52 »

Quote from: "DV85"
Smith, is very much like Duke....very good going forward, decent delivery....not very good defensivly....I dont think he is a full back and would be better off as a winger....which is what we should have done with Duke.

Smith played as a winger for the second half against Colchester and few weeks back and looked dangerous....


As i recall it, Duke used to go forward, see a man coming towards him, shit him self and pass it backwards.
Logged
DV
Has also heard this

Online Online

Posts: 33880


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #31 on: Monday, April 10, 2006, 20:03:17 »

Quote from: "Spuddy_STFC"
Quote from: "DV85"
Smith, is very much like Duke....very good going forward, decent delivery....not very good defensivly....I dont think he is a full back and would be better off as a winger....which is what we should have done with Duke.

Smith played as a winger for the second half against Colchester and few weeks back and looked dangerous....


As i recall it, Duke used to go forward, see a man coming towards him, shit him self and pass it backwards.


as I remember it Duke was the top assister in the league at one point during our play off season....
Logged
Bennett
No Comment

Offline Offline

Posts: 9736





Ignore
« Reply #32 on: Monday, April 10, 2006, 22:05:20 »

"at one point". was this mythical point before we'd scored perhaps so was joint top?
Logged

This is the water.
And this is the well.
Drink full and descend.
The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
DV
Has also heard this

Online Online

Posts: 33880


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #33 on: Tuesday, April 11, 2006, 16:15:59 »

Quote from: "bennett"
"at one point". was this mythical point before we'd scored perhaps so was joint top?


I believe it was January....but blah blah blah Duke was rubbish, never did anything because everyone says so...

We've missed Duke this season, more than most would like to admit.....we certainly havnt missed his defensive work, but his attacking play...
Logged
Piemonte

« Reply #34 on: Tuesday, April 11, 2006, 17:35:27 »

I dont think we've missed him at all, I'm sure that over the course of the season his shite defensive work would have cost us as many goals as his sometimes decent attacking play would have contributed.

If king had figured out that he was a rubbish full back and played him on the wing, it might be different, but we'll never know.
Logged
Bennett
No Comment

Offline Offline

Posts: 9736





Ignore
« Reply #35 on: Tuesday, April 11, 2006, 17:35:58 »

nah we have strikers that fear the ball now instead
Logged

This is the water.
And this is the well.
Drink full and descend.
The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
Johno

Offline Offline

Posts: 5927




Ignore
« Reply #36 on: Tuesday, April 11, 2006, 17:44:44 »

who cares about david duke?

i certaintly don't
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: