larwood
The girl least likely to.
Offline
Posts: 4653
|
|
« Reply #15 on: Monday, February 20, 2006, 09:39:18 » |
|
265 all out,not a bad effort.Well played by Blackwell, Jones hit 30 too [Geraint that is].Of course we can't read too much into the game,but it'll get the lads a bit warmed up for the real stuff.
|
|
|
Logged
|
I was a small, fat child in a welfare house There was only one thing I ever dreamed about And fate has just Handed it to me - whoopee
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Monday, February 20, 2006, 09:41:16 » |
|
ah good man fats, never knew you supported the sabres.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Monday, February 20, 2006, 09:50:00 » |
|
yep ever since the Botham days ...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Monday, February 20, 2006, 10:31:32 » |
|
couple of early wickets for Simon Jones! Promising
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Monday, February 20, 2006, 10:42:41 » |
|
41-4 .. come on England!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Monday, February 20, 2006, 11:01:09 » |
|
India CC 59-5 now! Monty got one!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Monday, February 20, 2006, 11:36:11 » |
|
71-8 !! COME ON!!!
Another for Monty and 2 for Harmy!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Monday, February 20, 2006, 11:37:36 » |
|
well we won with ease....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
larwood
The girl least likely to.
Offline
Posts: 4653
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Monday, February 20, 2006, 12:18:41 » |
|
Yes,rather a comprehensive victory for the lads The bowlers did well,i'm still a bit concerned about the batting though. I know it doesn't mean a lot, but its a better start than the one we made in Pakistan and will give them some confidence.
|
|
|
Logged
|
I was a small, fat child in a welfare house There was only one thing I ever dreamed about And fate has just Handed it to me - whoopee
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Monday, February 20, 2006, 12:52:30 » |
|
Blackers did well !!
My early 11 for 1st Test - providing we dont get injuries
Tresco Strauss Vaughan Pietersen Flintoff Bell G Jones Blackwell S Jones Harmison Hoggard
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Monday, February 20, 2006, 12:57:42 » |
|
they'll be more than one spinner i reckon. but they've got jones back for this series, dunno what they'll do.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Monday, February 20, 2006, 13:01:38 » |
|
yeah but im betting Vaughan is the 2nd spinner?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3891
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Monday, February 20, 2006, 14:13:16 » |
|
it'll be
tresco strauss vaughan bell pietersen flintoff g jones blackwell hoggard jones harmison
unless hoggard bowls like a twat in the next match then perhaps panesar will come in for him
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Monday, February 20, 2006, 14:16:08 » |
|
it'll be
tresco strauss vaughan bell pietersen flintoff g jones blackwell hoggard jones harmison
unless hoggard bowls like a twat in the next match then perhaps panesar will come in for him Vaughan can chuck down a few offies and I think KP could too
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Monday, February 20, 2006, 15:34:16 » |
|
blackwell as the main spinner? im the biggest blackwell fan here, but on his own? he'll get attacked and smacked all over the place. The fast bowler at the other end will be tight.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|