|
DMR
|
 |
« on: Monday, February 6, 2006, 10:48:55 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ben Wah Balls
 Offline
Posts: 5972
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Monday, February 6, 2006, 11:05:55 » |
|
Bit of a step down for Holloway to go to Leicester really.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33906
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Monday, February 6, 2006, 13:00:11 » |
|
give 'em Kings number  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Monday, February 6, 2006, 20:19:52 » |
|
Bit of a step down for Holloway to go to Leicester really. step down? much bigger club than QPR i would have thought? :? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ben Wah Balls
Offline
Posts: 5972
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Monday, February 6, 2006, 21:15:56 » |
|
Bit of a step down for Holloway to go to Leicester really. step down? much bigger club than QPR i would have thought? :? Not really. Their history is hardly illustrious and they're way below QPR in the league. I think of QPR as essentially a premier league team who've had some hard times, like Swindon. Leicester are a championship side at best, I'd love to see them relegated but if a great manager like Holloway goes there then it seems unlikely. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Monday, February 6, 2006, 21:50:03 » |
|
BWB thats bollocks. Leicester get bigger crowds these days and have had much more success in recent years than QPR. Admititly they are above them in the league though
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ben Wah Balls
Offline
Posts: 5972
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 01:05:07 » |
|
I think clubs are only as big as the division there in really. I hate Leicester, have done since 1993.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bennett
No Comment
Offline
Posts: 9745
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 09:12:44 » |
|
dude you've got anger issues. hating on arsenal and leicester, french, blacks, asians etc. i bet you hate gays, women, and kids as well don't you?
you make me sick
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
This is the water.
And this is the well.
Drink full and descend.
The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 12323
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 09:17:18 » |
|
Bit of a step down for Holloway to go to Leicester really. step down? much bigger club than QPR i would have thought? :? Not really. Their history is hardly illustrious and they're way below QPR in the league. I think of QPR as essentially a premier league team who've had some hard times, like Swindon. Leicester are a championship side at best, I'd love to see them relegated but if a great manager like Holloway goes there then it seems unlikely. QPR are where they historically live, just about, I think. Remember they won the League Cup as a lower league team. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 09:36:35 » |
|
Id say Leicester were a bigger club personally ... but since O Neill left they have gone backwards .. but a fantastic ground
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33906
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 17:17:55 » |
|
BWB thats bollocks. Leicester get bigger crowds these days and have had much more success in recent years than QPR. Admititly they are above them in the league though But QPRs Loftus Road only holds 15,000 is it? I have no idea how many they actually get, but they might only have lower attendences than Leicester due to space. Both small fry clubs tbh  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33906
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 17:19:29 » |
|
on second thoughts, they've both played in the Premier League and have won a League Cup.....that makes them fucking massive in my opinion....just like another club I know  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mark D
Offline
Posts: 85
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 20:01:33 » |
|
Based on current attendances and turnover (boring I know, but a valid rationale for the size of a club) you have to say that Leicester are bigger. Mind you, when they played at Filbert Street I would have said that Rangers were the bigger club. There I go mentioning a new stadium again, apologies!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 20:38:45 » |
|
Leicester have never been outside the top 2 divisions...Rangers have had lengthy spells with us in Div 3....
So we've played them loads and there's not much in it head to head, this means that Leicester have to be considered "bigger"
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 20:55:45 » |
|
On another note i got revenge on my Dad the other day, after Fallon left he was singing to me "Where's your Fallon gone?,where's your Fallon gone?". Que me then giving him a rendition of "Where's your Holloway?, where's your Holloway?" after finding out Holloway had been given Garden leave  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
